How Do Cal Football Fans Feel About 2009?
We'll get back to dissecting my slightly inflammatory post (which wasn't intended to be interpreted that way, but it ended up like that anyway) after Christmas. For now, as we settle into our holiday break, let's discuss one last time how we feel about this season.
Let's look at it both ways in a brief snapshot. Feel free to add anything I missed in the comments.
Pros
- Taking the Axe from the best Furd team of the decade.
- Winning in the Rose Bowl for the first time in the Tedford era.
- Beating a solid Arizona squad and ruining their Rose Bowl prospects.
- Getting the chance to watch three all Pac-10 players (Best, Alualu, Syd'Quan) who are likely to be playing on Sunday.
- Great running back play from Shane Vereen in relief of the injured Jahvid.
- Solid run defense anchored by Alualu up back and Mohamed in support.
Cons
- Playing 10 on 11 in Autzen.
- Poor quarterback play sinking us against the Trojans AGAIN.
- Jahvid nearly seriously injuring himself and ending his career, thanks to atrocious O-line performance.
- Inexcusable no-show in Seattle.
- Getting lit up by inaccurate and/or inexperienced quarterbacks in Masoli, Locker, Barkley, and now Wynn.
- ALAAAAMAAAARRRRRRR!!!!! (who really deserves and is getting his own set of posts for his long history of incompetence)
We've done a lot of report cards this year, but how would you grade the 2009 Cal football season and why?
1 recs |
31 comments
|
Comments
Grade a C+
This is more or less a repost of what I wrote last night after the game. We have the second winningest and we’re thankful. JT has the potential to run the team well because he’s done it before. And this year was a winning season. All that said, the team is at eight years w/Tedford’s system fully in place. Leaving aside whether he’s a nice guy or not, I’m interested to see what Tedford puts in place during the off-season – will Tedford get support where it’s apparently lacking, whether that is in recruiting, assistant coaches, or other factors?
Cal’s O-Line had difficulties this year, but they improved. Next season, time permitting, I intend to stat them a few games, to verify. Riley struggled this year. We’d like to see the slump stop.
I can’t see the locker room or Gregory inside it, but I can see Cal’s LB’s had difficulty this year. Over and over in the early games, and sometimes in the later games, the LB’s were out of position to make tackles on short passes because they did not react properly to the option and late release passes. These are high school techniques that are fostered and honed in college with proper coaching support.
I don’t believe Cal LB’s are inadequate athletically because they appear able to play the run well when they don’t arm-tackle (also coaching). But they appear unable to play the pass consistently. They need training to react immediately when they see the QB has kept the ball. Freezing in the headlights or treating every play like a run is why slants are getting behind them. This is a practice issue. That means a coaching issue. It might be Gregory, or it might be something we don’t know about.
Back to D. Cal DB’s had consistency difficulties this year, and I could see why on more than one occasion. On overload pass situations, cloud coverage did not react well, or support each other consistently. SQT is gifted athletically and Nnabufe impressed me with his fundamentals and reactions. DB’s appear inconsistently prepared for games and sometimes even confused. We want the Bears to win, and not just last season, or next year.
To me, the Bears are not playing to their potential. I can’t speak for others, but I doubt I’m alone in feeling direction appeared less evident from Bears leadership this year. Watching that screw-up at the end of the Poinsettia Bowl about going for two would not have happened in previous years I don’t think. Team focus apparently needs a renewal. Tedford should be sure that he and the team get the support in the off-season they need to improve in 2010, assuming the right pieces are available anywhere.
I was tempted to give this season a D, but the wins over Minnesota, UCLA, ASU, Arizona, and Stanford bring back too many positive memories to warrant a D, so I give this season a C. Had we won the final two games, it would have been a solid A.
Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!
If we had won the final 2 games, that’s still a B+, tops. A’s are reserved for conference championships and BCS bowls. A+ for an undefeated season, of course.
by atomsareenough on Dec 24, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
With the inconsistent O-line, non-existent passing D, and loss of Best, a 10-3 season with this team would have been a tremendous accomplishment. I’d have no hesitation to give it an A.
Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!
by Berkelium97 on Dec 24, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions
ah, i think i see
You’re curving it for the team. I’m grading the program.
by atomsareenough on Dec 24, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions
I was at the game last night, and it seemed to just match how our season went. We went up fast (just like our hot 3-0 start), Utah made some adjustments and were back in it (like our 3-2 record after Oregon and U$C), then our D stiffened and we had a nice drive to come back (like our run to beat Stanfurd), then it all fell apart in the fourth.
I guess I had a bad feeling in watching us score quickly, as we appear to get complacent.
I think in retrospect, we played up to our talent level this season. Our recruiting classes have been average the last couple of years and it shows on the field. I think we really need to recruit for the O-Line, as everything goes wrong on offense when our O-Line can’t do their job. Also, we need some beasts on the D-Line as we can’t seem to get pressure on the opposing QB at all
No arguments
Except where DB’s are concerned. I’ve seen too much confusion back there to think it’s all on the players. To my eye, DB’s and LB’s are not getting the support in practice to reach their potential. Granted, there could be other reasons. I hope it’s not talent, because that is very difficult to fix in one off-season.
It all depends on how you measure. Is this a grade of how the bears performed to their potential or how well they preformed in general? If it is the former, I don’t think that there is any question that they cannot be given a passing grade. This team had a great amount of talent (perhaps not quite as good as the preseason hype but still very good) and got blown out on four occasions, including once to a team that was should have been clearly inferior. All of the things on the “pro” list are things that were expected at the beginning of the year and probably would have been taken for granted had we had the season we hoped for.
Looking at it from the perspective of all of college football though, you have to give this season around a B-. While we did have some terrible losses, we also had some great wins, as noted above. Even though we didn’t meet our potential, I’d still rather be us than San Diego State, San Jose State, Washington State, and dozens of other teams who would die to switch with us.
It’s kind of like the high achiever who gets a B in a class: compared to other students it may not be that bad, but it is failing for him.
So I split the difference and give a C.
"It's going to be a long season" - Old Blues from 1868-present
Jahvid nearly seriously injuring himself and ending his career, thanks to atrocious O-line performance.
I don’t see what the offensive line’s performance has to do with Best being catapulted into the endzone (or before that landing badly after bringing down a high pass from Riley in the ASU game). Indirectly the o-line’s play affected the playcalling that put Best in those positions, but that’s about as close as the two actually come.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
If our O-line wasn’t playing that badly, no way does he lunge for the end zone.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
I don’t think that’s true.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Okay, then how about:
If our O-line wasn’t playing that badly, no way do we resort to Wildbear plays with Jahvid when we’re at the opponent’s 6 yard line.
Praise be to Tedford!
We ran Crazy with Vereen inside Stanfurd’s ten yard line at least once, when our offensive line did its best job blocking all year.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Best has a history of leaving his feet when he’s jumping at the endzone to score a TD. See fucla ‘08, UA ’08, Minnesota ’09, OSU ’09 for a few examples. What happened against OSU was a freak accident because instead of diving straight toward the endzone, he tried to jump over the defender. To blame the OL for Best’s injury is a bit of a stretch imo.
BOOOOOOOO!
Really frustrating season. Craig James nailed it last night in describing the performance of Cal’s offense in saying “they lack rythym.” So simple and so totally true. I think our offense peaked against Maryland. Unfortunately, I don’t have the football smarts to propose any detailed solutions beyond more consistent play from our WR’s and TE’s, better pass blocking from our O-line and improved leadership from Riley. Also, I’m getting tired of our ‘bend but don’t break’ defensive style. Final thought, the decision-making from our coaching staff in the last few weeks has certainly been questionable…kicking the field goal against Stanford, punting with 9 min left last night at the 50 on 4 and 3, having to take a damn timeout to go for two last night…inexcusable.
According to UC Berkeley’s grading standard, where average means B-, this season surely gets a D, which is equivalent to B+ at Stanfurd or A- at Harvard.
by coolingfan on Dec 24, 2009 1:13 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
One more pro
Showing heart at Minnesota. Started strong, let them back in it, but we hunkered down and played all 4 quarters, closing the door when it mattered.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
Great Memories from This Season
1. Rushing the field at Stanford Stadium. Oh Dear God, I hope we never lose to Stanford at Memorial Stadium…
2. Separate but (almost) equal, Mike Mohamed’s interception to seal the Big Game victory.
3. 10 v. 11 pick-six by Mychal Kendricks seals win over UCLA at Rose Bowl, sending Bruin faithful to the exits en masse.
4. Foles folly—the dream three-play sequence. Miracle double forward pass that pushed Arizona out of field goal range, fourth down stop, and Shane Vereen late 61 yard touchdown scamper to put Cal up by 8 (extra point, D’OH!).
5. Victory on the toe of Tavecchio—game winner versus Arizona State.
6. Jahvid Best’s #1— 93 yard all-world touchdown run.
7. Yes, another Big Game entry, but that’s just how awesome that win really was… Shane Vereen toting the rock to the tune of 42 carries in relief of Jahvid, besting Heisman runner-up Toby Gerhart for a day! Even better than #7…
8. Jahvid Best 5 touchdown performance in Big Ten country on ESPN.
by ttgiang15 on Dec 24, 2009 3:43 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
I give the season a D+/C-
Mostly because my expectations were so %$^&^ high given our pre-season ranking (which I swore I’d never put any credence in, and then I along came the basketball pre-season polls !!!!). I was at Memorial Stadium just after Fall Practice started and met The Jet (autograph, etc.). I told him, “On behalf of all us fans, I apologize for the pressure we’re putting on the team; we’re just really excited about the season.” He said the team was, too. But the two eggs we laid vs. Oregon and USC were SO bad, they don’t just count as losses to me. Really, the only thing that salvaged the season for me was beating the ‘Furd. Without that, I’d be pretty pissed off right now. As it is, I’m thankful football season is over and I’m looking to the future.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
I would give it a C-. My new expectation is anything less than a 10 win season is a failure.
by BlackandOldGold on Dec 25, 2009 4:01 PM PST reply actions
My new expectation is anything less than a 10 win season is a failure.
Twist… told…. me… no…. sarcasm…. must…. be…. snarky……..
All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!
by rollonubears on Dec 25, 2009 11:58 PM PST up reply actions
fuzzywuzzy
C grade…I think the 12th national ranking was way off to start with. Every expectation, or prediction, was based upon the stuff that just didn’t take place this year, like the linebackers stepping into the shoes of the three bears ( especially in pass D) Riley and the passing game improving ( this will obvioulsdy happen because they have one year under their belt – NOT) and the secondary continuing to be the shit. Oh yeah, then there’s Jahvid…
Most of that didin’t happen. Once teams figured out that our secondary ( Hagan, WTF???) couldn’t defend the pass – Nbuafie (sic) #15 ended up as a starter – opposing teams could gamble on three things:
a.) Riley would have an off day, because, he ahs off days, and
b.) the Receivers either can’t catch or can’t get open
c.) O-line may not block al that well that day
Hell, stack the box and blitz like crazy,you’ll catch Jahvid or the QB doing that. I’m happy we won 8 games, in particular stunfurd. I think this year the Bears knew there were issues, and knew they might not live up to expectations, so when it started to go bad in the games that it did, it turned into a major diarreah bath.
The only good thing about next year is we won’t have the same expectations…i would be surprised if we are rankled higher than 30.
Clearly a D+
The three wins at the beginning were against the weakest slate of non-conference opposition in years (not the fault of the schedule-makers as much as it is the fault of Minnesota and Maryland). So that doesn’t count for a whole lot. The losses against USC and Oregon were Tedford’s worst losses ever - he went years never losing a game by more than 14 points, and against better opposition in many cases. The other conference victories provided some entertainment and were somewhat impressive, actually. So going into the Washington game the season was shaping up as something that COULD have been an A- (A is very difficult in my book without a BCS game in the mix), had we won that game and the Sun Bowl. But sorry, I have to give very heavy weight to the loss at a still-pretty-bad Washington team, which kept us out of the second place tie. And to the bowl loss, because losing bowl games smells mightily. What could have turned it into a C? Any of the following: the exact same W-L result except that the team is competitive in its losses. A win at Washington. Turn it into a B? Simply winning the bowl game. That would mostly have erased the Washington loss, which we could then look on as an anomaly. Without the Stanfurd win it’s a D- and without that and all three of Arizona/ASU/UCLA it’s an F
if alamar has a job next year, i will simply be beyond words. i found myself hoping we wouldn’t score b/c i didn’t want us to give away all the momentum via kickoff td. there were a lot of games where we would’ve done much better to just kick it out of bounds every time. don’t think that reflects well on him.






















