Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Golden Nuggets: "[A sense of urgency] was spotty all season long"

Dan Greenspan writes about Tepper's post-game comments.

"We’re not going to accept anything but victory," Tepper said.

"(Athletic director) Sandy (Barbour), Coach (Jeff Tedford), all the coaches and players, we all believe we can win a national championship. We just got to do it. As much as they hold us to that, why doesn’t our fan base as well? I like our fans. I think they’re great. They traveled pretty well, but people who don’t buy this as a bad season are incorrect."

The Bears have the talent to win. The players are there. Running back Jahvid Best was healthy when Oregon and USC pushed around Cal. Defensive lineman Tyson Alualu is a beast. Up and down the roster are the necessary athletes.

Many will put the blame on Tedford for a passive offensive game plan or defensive coordinator Bob Gregory for a secondary that missed tackles and assignments all night long or special teams coach Pete Alamar for a 61-yard kick return that put the Utes right back in the game after falling behind 14-0.

Wrong again, according to Tepper.

"If you’re getting paid as much as our coaches are, you’re going to have a good game plan. If you don’t, they are going to make adjustments on the sidelines and make it a good game plan," he said. "I think it is player execution.

"Once again, it was everyone taking turns. We missed protections. Kevin didn’t throw the ball fast enough on a protection. He overthrew a fullback. I missed a block on a run play. I know Mark Boskovich missed a block on a run play that if he would have hit, he would have separated and it would have been six points. We took turns making mistakes.

"This team has enough talent to beat Florida or Alabama or anything, I think it’s a sense of urgency on the players. It was spotty (all season long)."

...

Tedford is one of the highest paid employees in the state of California. The university is spending millions to upgrade Memorial Stadium.

If you don’t want to win it all, drop the program.

Otherwise, what’s the point?

That is Tepper’s point.

After the jump we look back at last night's loss to Utah as well as some of the questions Cal will face in the offseason.  GN will take tomorrow off and return Sunday. Happy holidays!

Star-divide

Cal Football

Comment 73 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’d be a demanding fan if I had any clue what the hell that means.

"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.

It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0

by AERose on Dec 24, 2009 11:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Tedford shouldn't start Riley next season

Its obvious that Riley doesn’t have the mental and physical requirements to succeed as a Pac 10 QB. If Tedford was a good coach, he would realize this and say “Sorry Kevin, but we need to go a different route next season. (Like he did with Ayoob after 05).”

If he starts Riley next season, its evidence to me that Tedford doesn’t think winning is the most important thing and that decision will eventually cost him his job- since Riley isn’t going to get any better (he’s too small, too weak, and doesn’t have the intangibles).

by Bowlbasaur on Dec 24, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions  

That said, it’s also up to the other quarterbacks to step up. You take the job away from the starter.

by BlackandOldGold on Dec 24, 2009 10:26 PM PST up reply actions  

totally agree

wtf dude. that was ridiculous…

"He's so fast, he can turn off the lights and be in bed before it gets dark!" -- Lee Corso on Jahvid Best in NCAA 10.

by dirt on Dec 24, 2009 10:44 PM PST up reply actions  

For one

Apparently Sweeney’s made strides and has overtaken Mansion. Maybe he’ll get even better and beat out Riley, but BlackandOldGold is right. It’s up to Sweeney or Mansion to step up.

by BleedinBlue on Dec 25, 2009 12:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree. Sometimes it seems like the football operation thinks of the fans as an enemy to be defeated.

So what can you say?

by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 25, 2009 2:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Et tu, Spazzy?

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 5:55 AM PST up reply actions  

wha?

So what can you say?

by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 25, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

There’s no inexplicable here. It was very explicable. It was a remarkably explicable reason. I’ve never seen a reason more explicable. It was one of the most explicable things I’ve ever seen!

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 5:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Um...

I know what goes on at practice…

I've been Honked...

by giantfan5 on Dec 25, 2009 8:53 AM PST up reply actions  

We talkin' bout practice?

Practice?

I’m back! Yeah, that bowl game sucked.

Cal Football: Next Year.

Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.

by CalBandGreat on Dec 27, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

based on what I read from practice… it seemed like Jahvid wasn’t going to be ready for the season because all I read about was how he wasn’t participating in full contact practice. We all know that wasn’t the case.

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory...

by Hey Bowles Hall! on Dec 26, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree. We have the stupidest football coach in the nation. Bowlbasaur for coach!

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Dec 26, 2009 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

U don’t have the intangibles to moderate, HydroTech!

Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.

by CalBandGreat on Dec 27, 2009 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Bowlbasaur for coach!

He won’t be ready to coach until he evolves.

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 29, 2009 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

If he starts Riley next season, its evidence to me that Tedford doesn’t think winning is the most important thing

The whole “Tedford secretly doesn’t want to win” thing is soooooooooooooooo 2007. Come back when you’ve got a new unreasonable and wholly unfounded criticism for 2010. I’m thinking “Tedford is part of the Illuminati and owns all the world’s media.” On no! All the world’s media?!!?

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 5:18 AM PST up reply actions  

I dunno, I believe that logic. I mean, it’s obvi you don’t want CGB to be a successful blog. Why else would you continue to comment?

Hiyo!

So good to be back home. I missed you guys.

Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.

by CalBandGreat on Dec 27, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Ive seen him play. In the dreams of my heart!

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions  

You take you and your reason over there and just shut the hell up. Irrationality is the new sheriff in town and it does NOT like to be challenged! Party Yacht motherfuckers!

All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!

by rollonubears on Dec 26, 2009 12:13 AM PST up reply actions  

awww c’mon, we need you on the ‘reason’ side – just until the bowl season calms down.

Can we count on your help?

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:14 AM PST up reply actions  

But I just made this Gregory effigy!

All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!

by rollonubears on Dec 26, 2009 12:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Turn it into a Mack Brown effigy!

That kinda thing is ALWAYS useful :-D

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Any effigy + devil horns = Mack Brown effigy.

All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!

by rollonubears on Dec 26, 2009 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

you mean like these?

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps Riley is the best QB that we have?

Also, the 2005/2006 situation versus the 2009/2010 situation are different. Ayoob was the backup QB in 2005. Riley was the starter in 2009.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Dec 26, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, Riley is just like Nate Longshore the two years before. When is Tedford going to acknowledge that his starting QB is not getting the job done and replace him with someone else ???? If he continues to play Riley as you say, it will cost him his job in time !!

by PhilipL on Dec 28, 2009 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Man, Cal had

so much potential… but Tedford’s game plan was the weak link. That offense with that defense with that obvious lack of ‘a sense of urgency’ (read ‘lack of discipline’) was easy to predict and hard to watch by the end of the season.

What happened to the spell HB after Best’s injury? How did that become less valuable suddenly? Why did we not see DBo or Isi as the spell HB? I really think Cal’s offense was better with the spell back taking reps, and beyond that… when you have an anomaly such as the 6 series/18 yard production— why not try something new?

No edge rusher? No pain train? Rush four not three. It’s like they decided to stick with the 3-4 even when it was totally useless. Cal could not compete with a three man rush with that personnel. The 3-4 took a huge step back.

And it all ties in together. The weak pass rush left db’s exposed kept the defense on the field… the weak line didn’t protect Riley, Riley lacked the intangibles, the receivers lacked the intangibles, kept the defense on the field… the inexperienced and inexplicable lb core couldn’t decide who would play outside or inside, so they played confused, and they KEPT THE DEFENSE ON THE FIELD.

Special teams worked to keep the defense off the field— by insisting the opponent play on a shortened field. That worked.

Cal’s game-plan is over-exposed like more than one of Tiger’s hos. But, I digress.

"He's so fast, he can turn off the lights and be in bed before it gets dark!" -- Lee Corso on Jahvid Best in NCAA 10.

by dirt on Dec 25, 2009 12:38 AM PST reply actions  

Correct on both points. Game plans are overrated. If players execute and win their individual battles, then even the dumbest gameplans can win.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Dec 26, 2009 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

No edge rusher? No pain train? Rush four not three. It’s like they decided to stick with the 3-4 even when it was totally useless. Cal could not compete with a three man rush with that personnel. The 3-4 took a huge step back.

What you’re getting at here is not so much a deficiency in coaching, but a shortcoming of our players. With Follett gone, we didn’t have anyone who could consistently terrorize opposing QBs. I’m not sure if you watched the bowl game, but Gregory was using a lot of 4:3. It still wasn’t getting pressure. And it seemed like every time we rushed five, pressure was still minimal. It’s tough to accept, but our D is a less talented, less cohesive group than it was last year. Gregory didn’t suddenly go from brilliant in 2008 to incompetent in 2009.

Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!

by Berkelium97 on Dec 25, 2009 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Was it 4-3? Or a nickel formation with 4 down linemen with 2 linebackers and 5 dbacks? I don’t know if we ran 4-3 much this season…

Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash Kunnath on Dec 25, 2009 10:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Hmm, I actually don’t remember counting the LBs as often as I was counting down linesmen. It very well may have been a 4:2:5. I thought I did see 4:3 a few times out there. Either way, lots of looks with 4 down linemen.

Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!

by Berkelium97 on Dec 25, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

You weren’t seeing things. We did run the 4-3 with 4 true DL and 3 true LBs a few times this year. We did use that specific personnel group during the bowl game.

by Cali49a on Dec 25, 2009 11:58 PM PST up reply actions  

yep yep, I saw that too. We defiinitely ran some 4-3 out there against Utah.

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Yikes

What’s truly terrifying about this situation (and even the usually idiotic commentators picked up on it) was our ability to rush only 3 and still manage to have single coverage (or less) down the field.

by The Wrecking Jew on Dec 25, 2009 7:46 PM PST up reply actions  

God I love your handle.

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 26, 2009 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

That’s what your mom said. JUVENILE HUMOR!

by The Wrecking Jew on Dec 26, 2009 10:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Way to go, Twist’s mother is dead. Now he’s quit this blog forever.

by paleodan on Dec 26, 2009 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

HUZZAH!

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 26, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, I guess I was mistaken. Too bad.

by paleodan on Dec 26, 2009 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

What if Tedford

‘lacked the intangibles’?

and yeah I watched the game. I also noticed a play Utah ran right over the top of our safeties for a bomb against a three man rush. It’s no mystery the 3-4 has been week ALL season. No more three man rushes… cue the Bob Greggory defense…

The comment about the spell back only coming out when Best looked ‘tired’ seems misguided. Vereen was the spell back, and they spelled him often and they’ve done this since ’08, and it made the system more effective IMO.

If all the kids are making mistakes, maybe it reflects the coach. Did Tedford recruit all these kids? He was a gracious stoic patron at fan appreciation day— but to what effect?

When we made the trip to Eugene and saw Cal ruin a chance to get back in to contention on a pass to Tucker, and watched him get flagged for taunting— the coaching bug was pretty obvious. That was such a fundamental flaw in the WR’s ‘approach’ to the game. It almost bit Cal against Minnesota. But, Tucker broke Cal fans’ hearts all season with his antics and he barely claimed a starting spot from Boateng IIRC. By the numbers, Tucker had a productive year. However, I believe Boateng could have started, and that it was almost a toss up. Who knows how things might have turned out if Cal went with the ‘possession’ receiver instead. Riley’s a great scapegoat, but the Cal receivers blew this year and we needed Nyan in there as a starter to develop a firmer and simpler ‘possession’ passing game. Remember, we win in Wahington, and none of these questions happen.

Next question: did Tedford underestimate the (Pac-10) competition?

"He's so fast, he can turn off the lights and be in bed before it gets dark!" -- Lee Corso on Jahvid Best in NCAA 10.

by dirt on Dec 25, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

and yeah I watched the game. I also noticed a play Utah ran right over the top of our safeties for a bomb against a three man rush. It’s no mystery the 3-4 has been week ALL season. No more three man rushes… cue the Bob Greggory defense…

I recall this play. Utah sent 4 receivers out initially on this play and the RB released to his check down route when he saw there was no need for his extra blocking. 5 receivers vs 8 defenders in zone coverage. You would think the 8 defenders could cover the 5 receivers.

Gregory sent pressure early in the game with 4-5 guys with mixed success, but Utah continued running the ball to keep the D honest and started hitting screens, play action, shovel passes, and other quick passes that got the ball out of the QBs hands quickly and rendered our pass rush ineffective.

If your solution is to send 6 guys, which would leave 5 defenders to cover 4 receivers, and as a DC you don’t know if the pressure will get to the qb because the other team’s OC has been calling plays to get rid of the ball quickly, dropping 8 into coverage isn’t such a bad idea especially when you don’t know if Utah is going to run or pass from the 20. It’s playing it safe.

Did you notice that Utah receiver who caught this TD ran a route untouched nearly 20 yards downfield and put a double move on our safety? You should be asking yourself why that receiver got downfield through the linebacker coverage untouched rather than complaining about how rushing 3 is worse than cancer, hypertension, and kidney stones combined.

The weak pass rush left db’s exposed….

Well let’s see here. The more guys you blitz, the more exposed you leave your secondary. The less guys you rush, the more coverage and protected the secondary becomes. You can’t have it both ways.

I think you should get a new hobby other than armchair QBing. You’re not very good at it.

by Cali49a on Dec 26, 2009 2:30 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

gaaah

Come on, people, the 3-4 does NOT = 3 man rush. The 3-4 when well employed will rush LBs or safeties as well as the three down linemen. The advantage of it is the flexibility that comes from the offense not really knowing who the 4th rusher will be. Of course, when you have a Ron Rivera or a Zach Follett you might have a good idea who it most often will be, but then you don’t know where he’s coming from all the time either if he’s stunting. I’m no fan of the 3 man rush, but folks on this board should stop equating it with the 3-4.

by ososdeoro on Dec 26, 2009 6:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Can I equate the 3-4 with a delicious turkey dinner?

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 26, 2009 7:55 AM PST up reply actions  

only if it is paired with mashed potatoes and stuffing.

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 11:35 AM PST up reply actions  

This.

rez’d

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

FIRE LONGSHORE!

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 26, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions  

LONGSHOOOOORRRRRRREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.

by CalBandGreat on Dec 27, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I think blaming the coaches for what happens in the game doesn’t necessarily mean it’s only their playcalling that’s at fault. For example, I don’t blame Gregory for only rushing 3 a lot of the time. However, when we’re in our last game of the season and we still find situations where dropping 8 provides far less than adequate coverage, questions have to be asked about how the players are being coached. I understand that maybe our players just aren’t that talented, but I have trouble believing that it’s all on them. At some point (particularly by the end of the season), it’s has to be up to the coaches to train away some of those little mistakes. I’m not advocating firing Gregory, or anyone else, per se. But I think it’s unfair to just give the coaches a pass by saying they’ve done the best they can with the players they have. Does anyone think that’s 100% true? I’m of the opinion that early-season mistakes are on the shoulders of the players. Those same mistakes late in the season have to fall at least a little on the coaching staff. Just my two cents.

by The Wrecking Jew on Dec 26, 2009 11:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Spot on

Fans have always refrained from heavy criticism of players due to this erroneous belief that the coach is responsible for everything which happens good or bad. But in reality, the players play the game. The coaches can only do so much and then things are out of their hands and it’s up to the players. While this year’s team did have some great talent in Best, Thompson, and Alualu, it was also really bad in other places. Really bad.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Dec 26, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

of course it would. simplify things and play to your advantages. Have you seen Texas play this year?

true or false:

Cal played a spread offense with a QB that had

a. minimal range
b. minimal wheels
c. minimal heart
d. all of the above

 

"He's so fast, he can turn off the lights and be in bed before it gets dark!" -- Lee Corso on Jahvid Best in NCAA 10.

by dirt on Dec 25, 2009 1:20 AM PST reply actions  

I’m not sure why Tedford played “Little Jimmy” at QB, but yknow what? I trust him. If he says Little Jimmy can throw his crutches off and run Cal to victory, I say, let’s do this thing!

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 5:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Tedford’s salary is too high for anyone to be happy with “settling” for an 8-5 season – that’s one more loss away from a 7-6 record – yes, that same painful record we had in the ’07 meltdown season.

By saying this, I’m not suggesting Tedford is overpaid; I’m just trying to argue that we should expect more from a coach being paid $1.8 million-plus per year. How much more we should expect is debatable. But 8-5, with a number of embarrassing blowout losses along the way, is definitely not cutting it.

i'm here to clean your pool but i don't have a pool *bowchica bowow*

by ch0ster on Dec 25, 2009 2:02 AM PST reply actions  

Tedford’s salary is definitely more than $1.8 million. He’s the second highest paid coach in the Pac-10.

by BeareatsTacos on Dec 25, 2009 2:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, talk to Nike about their investment. If they feel that their million or so dollar a year investment in Tedford isn’t paying off then they can figure it out.

President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Dec 25, 2009 5:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Keeping in mind that it is hard to determine exact numbers, since head coaches get money from all kinds of sources (performance bonuses, retention bonuses, corporate sponsorships, etc.) that are not always reported in full, most measures would have Tedford’s salary between 15th and 25th nationally. His overall winning percentage and average national ranking actually falls right about in the middle of that, so it’s a bit of a stretch to say that he’s being overpaid.

Having the 20th best record doesn’t mean that you finish ranked at #20 every year, of course — there are ups and downs, and this year was one of the downs.

by sycasey on Dec 26, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think any rational person is satisfied with (or "settling" for) an 8-5 season

Just because it’s what we ended up with doesn’t mean it’s what we expected or what we’re looking for next year. Personally, I want 10 wins to be attainable each year, and attained in some of those years, with a Rose Bowl in there SOMEWHERE before I die. Is THAT too much to ask? Don’t answer that…..

I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.

by BTown85 on Dec 26, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Isn’t Tedford’s salary not directly meted out from the UC? I heard that most of it was coming from private donations.

Lets put our offensive troubles in this perspective-
1) Predictable
2) Poor O-Line leads to few holes for RB
3) QB running for life, starts to get happy feet/trigger happy and locks in on receivers or overthrows them
4) WRs not stepping up

by calbears04 on Dec 25, 2009 11:35 PM PST reply actions  

Correct, the vast majority of Tedford's salary does NOT come from university funding

…it comes from other sources, NOT state money.

Also, I’d like everyone to note that Coach Tedford is voluntarily participating in the UC’s systemwide pay reduction program. As coaches are basically independent contractors, they are not obligated to participate, yet Tedford and 33 other coaches are doing so of their own free will. While people will complain that Tedford’s pay reduction only amounts to $22,500, that amount is easily equal to someone’s annual salary – so that is no small gift.

CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by BearStage on Dec 26, 2009 12:28 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Should we now call this the Tepper Doctrine: Cal football shall never accept mediocrity because of prior ineptitude.

by BlackandOldGold on Dec 26, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions  

my normal line

i showed up to the game and immediately started checking the sideline for msg; the bears are just a very different team with him in the game; he makes the o-line work and they can run behind him play after play. when i saw he wasn’t playing i just thought, well, this will be just like the msg-less massacres that usc, osu and uw were; can’t overemphasize how vital he is for everything in the 2k dime. in the furd game he was so rough that their lineman just started fighting him in frustration.

by need4jahvid on Dec 26, 2009 6:29 PM PST reply actions  

CAL Bears Football & Jeff Tedford's Performance

I think Tedford gets a “D”, his Defensive Coordinator gets an “F” and should be replaced in 2010 !!

Let’s start w/ the Offense – Kevin Riley (as was the case w/ Nate Longshore the previous couple of years) is not a PAC-10 starting QB PERIOD !! He simply cannot perform in the clutch let alone complete key passes in critical games !! He may be fine for mopping up WSU and others BUT when it comes to Oregon, SC & OSU, he is out of his league but is it Riley’s fault or does Tedford get the blame for ruining a couple of seasons by sticking w/ his starting QB’s when it is painfully obvious to everyone watching that they lack the skills to compete !! I blame Tedford as he is far too stubborn and shows no signs of changing his coaching styke to do what he needs to do to win games at Berkeley. Now if this is what Sandy Barbour, the Chancellor and the UC Nerkeley Administration want, then Tedford is their man. If they want a coach like Jim Harbaugh who gets great performance out of some average players, then it is time to look for someone new, as Tedford does not excel in preparing his players for critical (must win) games !! He has shown this repeatedly thruout his career.

As for defense, I am no Coach but if I see another flanker screen going for a first down, a big gain or a touchdown, I will vomit !! I am so goddam sick and tired of Bob Gregory and his woefully prepared defensive unit. In previous years, CAL’s defense would have tackled the receiver for a loss, knocked the ball down or intercepted it but not this season and THESE CLOWNS, Gregory/Tedford never made the adjustments thruout the entire season to show that they could defend against this one simple play, SO EVERY TEAM FROM THEN ON RAN IT OVER AND OVER FOR BIG GAINS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tyson Alaualau is getting double and triple teamed on virtually every down, and this obviously leaves someone unblocked or partially blocked, why is this lineman not pressuring the QB ? It is abundantly apparent that CAL has no pass-rush with four (4) DL, so why in God’s name do they go to a three man rush when they cannot get any pressure on the Passer w/ four men ??? Earlier said the Nickle Dfense must go and his absolutely right !!!!

by PhilipL on Dec 28, 2009 4:36 PM PST reply actions  

TWIST, I MAY EXPLODE IF I’M NOT A INCREDIBLE DICK TO THIS GUY. PLEASEEEEE LIFT THE SARCASM BAN.

All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!

by rollonubears on Dec 28, 2009 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, wow… Does Gregory get credit for the “previous years…defense [that] would have tackled the receiver for a loss, knocked the ball down or intercepted it”? Or is Gregory only in charge in years where the secondary does poorly?

by paleodan on Dec 28, 2009 9:26 PM PST up reply actions  

There's a sarcasm ban?

That’s it, I’m writing a letter to the Nerkeley Administration to ask if we can get Jim Harbaugh up in here.

by The Wrecking Jew on Dec 31, 2009 1:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar700_small
DBD 2.1.12: Memorial Stadium=Happiness

Recent FanPosts

20955_937378249336_2535124_52060718_7603102_n_small
New/Old Traditions for the New/Old Memorial...
Ajoceywcalhatpic_small
DBD 2/10/12: The Day the Interwebz Broke
47081_1264898881265_1793562355_517598_1551191_s_small
Harper/Jorge Giant Cut-Out Heads
Ab_small
DBD 2.9.12 The CGB Cocktail Party
Avinash4_small
DBD 2.8.12 An Important Question
Snoopy1_small
DBD 2.7.2012 Puppies!
Boosmall_small
DBD 2/6/2012: Highlights from Yesterday's Game
Ab_small
DBD 2.3.12 Thank you, DBD!
Cstcst3644_small
DBD 2.2.12 I Am A DBD Originalist

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

More great SB Nation Blogs

Pac-12 On SBN

Pacific Takes (Pac-12)

Pacifictakes-165x74_medium

NORTH

AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)

UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)

CougCenter: (Washington State)

BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)

Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)

CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)

 

SOUTH

BruinsNation: (UCLA)

ConquestChronicles: (USC)

HouseOfSparky: (ASU)

Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)

TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)

Block U: (Utah)


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

Cstcst3644_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Avinash4_small Avinash Kunnath

Jahvidtician

Bear__small norcalnick

Monty_in_cal_gear_small Ohio Bear

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Ajoceywcalhatpic_small Kodiak

Mbc_small ManBearCal

Members Of The Follettariat

Sofele20squarecal_stanford2011_small solarise

Rugby_split_small RugbyVet

The Hit Squad

1129748640_small LeonPowe

Atom_small atomsareenough

Basketball_desktop_small CALumbus Bear

Humpty_dance_1_small Cugel