Emotional Reactions To Football Sporting Events
Recently, the Cal football team got absolutely waxed by the University of Washington football team. It was a shocking event, because many people believed Cal would win. And many people believed it wouldn't even be close. Washington was a sub-500 team and Cal was in line to be tied for 2nd in the Pac10. Cal was coming off of two big victories, including an epic victory over Stanford in the Big Game.
Understandably when Cal was defeated and by such a large margin, Cal fans were remarkably upset. We ran a poll regarding this and found this response:
If you are having trouble reading that jpeg, you can click on it to make it larger. Or, in the alternative, I can inform you that of the 317 people who voted, the majority chose "Furious." Other options included "Ebullient," "Pleased," "Apathetic," "Downcast," and "Drunk." Furious had 130 votes, roughly 40 votes more than the next highest vote-getter "Downcast."
So, the obvi mood after the game was that people were furious. Furious. Furious? What the what? Normally, I get furious at much more important things than football games, like being unable to get what I want at a sample sale or people wearing black and navy blue at the same time. So, I was confused by people being "furious" over a sporting event.
I guess it's difficult for me to comprehend such a strong emotional reaction to Cal football failure. Cal football failure was the norm for my first three years as a Cal fan. Being in the marching band, I went to every home game, save for one, which conflicted with my cousin's batmitzvah. I also went to the LA game each year and the Big Game at Stanford. During that stretch, in games I personally witnessed, Cal won 7 of them. And later had to forfeit 4 of those wins due to violations. So, if i counted correctly, Cal won 7 out of 21 games.
Not exactly a sterling result and those were the games I watched in person. We had many away losses, also. Being in the marching band, each of those home games consisted of 10-12 hour days. 10-12 hour days that, due to the general start time of 12:30 PM for these non-televised games, started redick early. Like 6 AM early.
A lot of that day consisted of standing around, waiting for things to happen (before the game itself even started!). Given my unquenchable thirst for socialization, it was an all-day party atmosphere. Given the general end result of the games, the party atmosphere was the focal point of the day. Win or lose, it wouldn't exactly alter how much fun we would have.
Sure, winning was great, but even if we lost, we still chilled all day long. And if we did win, even better! Especially considering we couldn't really control anything, no matter how strongly we adhered to our inane rituals and superstitions. Even today, I have a wide variety of superstitions that I am CONVINCED will affect the on-field actions, no matter how many states away Cal may be playing. And even today, I try to take that same attitude towards Cal football. That it is less about the wins and losses and more about how much fun I have. Is that a self-centered attitude? Yes. On the same wavelength, I can only get control things I can control. I can't control ANYTHING related to the on the field action, except for being the 1/10,000th voice screaming on Defense. So, while it feels incredibly satisfying to watch success, it is emotionally irrational to allow negative emotion over football failure. This is especially true, considering the large amount of happiness being surrounded by Cal football friends brings us.
I am not a perfect person (BY FAR) and so I cannot always adhere to this philosophy. Nonetheless, I do try my hardest and so the concept that one could be "furious" over a football game seems foreign to me. Furious is such a strong emotional reaction. I mean it's not just "sad" or "depressed" or "disappointed," all much more reasonable reactions. It is beyond that level of reasonableness. What would make me furious? Being physically assaulted? Being financially cheated? I mean, am I wrong to believe that it requires something DIRECTLY affecting you to get to the level of "furious"? Nothing is actually happening to you here! It's a game! You aren't playing QB. You aren't coaching Special Teams. You are just watching a piece of sports entertainment.
So, please help me understand this situation. Because I clearly am in the great minority here. How is it that Cal's loss here made you furious? I'm not here to negate anybody's legitimate emotional experience. I'm just so unbelievably confused that I can't begin to approach that emotional experience. Please, CGB denizens, help me better understand how a sporting event can create a "furious" emotional experience. and GO BEARS!
54 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think some people voted furious because downcast wasn’t a strong enough word do discribe how emotionally shattered they were from the loss.
In communist Russia, Sanchez declares YOU!
by HOUSE66 on Dec 14, 2009 5:06 AM PST via mobile reply actions
I think it’s a generational difference. Those of us with a long history with Cal football and how it’s been neglected for decades (thanks my freshman year prez, Ira Michael Heyman!), we have a more mellow view. We understand that this is an unprecedented (at least modern era) epoch in Cal football history. Those who come to Cal in the past seven years react like we’re supposed to be USC. They’ve always seen Cal win, so their bar is different. As a result, we get different emotions. I’m always perturbed at the newbies because of these “entitled” responses. But it is what it is as some philosopher probably said.
by BlackandOldGold on Dec 14, 2009 7:05 AM PST reply actions
I voted apathetic,
because tack-on games following the Big Game don’t count. At least they don’t count when WE HAVE THE AXE! Really, does anything else matter?
As far as I’m concerned, the only college football that should be played after Thanksgiving weekend are bowl and play-off games. I boycott the rest.
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Dec 14, 2009 7:53 AM PST reply actions
In this poll, I believe that the word “furious” was the closest choice to the word “disgusted”. “Experienced a sense of Deja vu” would have been my choice.
by prd74 on Dec 14, 2009 7:57 AM PST via mobile reply actions
For the record, I voted "Drunk"
And boy was I. While we were at Manny’s, I forgot that the Udub game was still being played, stopped watching and started socializing. And drinking more.
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
Nevermind those who voted "Furious"
Who the hell voted “Pleased”?
People who like women in high heels to stomp on their testicles?
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
by CalBandGreat on Dec 14, 2009 8:07 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
So, while it feels incredibly satisfying to watch success, it is emotionally irrational to allow negative emotion over football failure.
I agree that it’s not worth getting furious about, and I appreciate your positivity regarding the big picture of spending a good day with friends. However, I think fandom necessarily means an emotionally irrational attachment to a team, and that emotion can take many forms. Getting upset over a bad loss is just another expression of fandom. People can have emotionally irrational reactions to other forms of entertainment like movies or whatnot; why not football?
Another point is that we let the football team subsume the greater identity of the university community, and if the football team disappoints, then we, as football fans, believe that that loss reflects on the us. Even if rationally we were to say that we had little or nothing to do with the on-field performance, we are emotionally attached to this team because we’ve all adopted the identity of the Cal community. Maybe this makes no rational sense, but on some level neither does spending three hours watching 11 players try to move a piece of leather across a field; in other words, it doesn’t have to make sense for us to be fans.
Furious.
No…not going to do it…no way.
To now act like its no big deal, like losing is second nature to a Cal fan, is a cop-out. We were on the cusp of a kick-ass finish to a good season, one that showed mettle and mental toughness – a certain resiliency we lacked in past years.
And we blew it against Washington.
So yeah, I’m furious. Furious because we know we’re capable of so much more. If we sucked, it we were Wazzu, I’d probably be more chill about it, but that’s not the case. We have an amazing team, arguably the most talented in the Pac-10. And so its infuriating to see them play so far below what they’re capable of.
I love when we win and I spit bile when we lose. Multiply those by 10 when Stanfurd is the opponent. That’s why I’ll be dead by 40.
I felt
furious… because, echoing Gianko, we’re capable of so much more. I wasn’t devastated after OSU because you could see the loss coming, just from the way Canfield was owning everyone vs our excellent pass defense (lol).
This is good. I guess my question is this. What takes a game from “Disappointed” to “Furious”? I guess that’s my confusion, because it seems to be on a spectrum and Furious is a much more extreme version of disappointed.
President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I’m guessing a close loss to Washington rather than a blowout is what would swing the pendulum. If the Bears had fought hard but had lost by a close margin, then I’m guessing there’d have been a lot of disappointment but not as much anger.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Dec 14, 2009 10:33 AM PST up reply actions
Don’t you think some people voted “furious” just for the hell of it? I mean, it’s just an internet poll. It doesn’t actually mean anything. People just check whatever box appeals to them on the spur of the moment. (Sorry if this disillusions you.)
November 20, 1982 - a date that will live in famy.
Sounds like I wasted 20 minutes of my life, then!
President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Sure but,
In as much as what people mark IS a reflection of what they are feeling at the time, I think Twist’s question is valid. That people could feel furious about a loss even if only for the time it takes to click Furious can be difficult to understand. Personally, I get extremely down and dispirited after a Cal loss. I can be in a funk for days. But I don’t get mad. I could never be upset AT my Bears. Disappointed? Every year we don’t make the Rose Bowl, but never mad.
It’s just after managing to beat Zona and Furd, two of the Pac-10’s upper-tier teams that we could have very well lost against, and then get killed by a team that will not go to a bowl game… hell, not even have a winning season, is essentially like dropping the biggest disappointment bomb of all time.
It’s like getting a really awesome chocolate pie and eating a good portion of it. Then you go for another piece and it suddenly all falls out of the tin and onto the kitchen floor.
You’d be pretty upset that the pie now has to be thrown out because of such a dumb move. Losing to the Huskies by 32 points was dropping the pie onto the kitchen floor.
"Today's weather, excessively violent with a chance of dismemberment. Tune in later for our 5-day forecast!"
~ Three Dog - Fallout 3
I think the most angry I’ve been after a loss was Az ’06. OSU ’07 was just sad. But the sheer improbability of all the terrible shit that went against us made me furious with god himself.
The Lack of Mack's Imposition Attacks My Disposition.
in Az 06
The Lack of Mack's Imposition Attacks My Disposition.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 14, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
“Furious” probably wasn’t the right word, but that’s the one I voted for, because it was closest of all the options to what I was feeling at the time, which was a mixture of extreme disgust, annoyance, frustration, and disappointment.
by atomsareenough on Dec 14, 2009 10:59 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
furious...
……actually, my perspective is USUALLY precisely the same as yours, complete with the band experience and everything. But for some reason Big Game made me a believer (which as a Cal fan one should never do) and then we got sucker-punched the next game. And it was all due to lack of effort and preparation. Hence, anger. I dislike being emotionally toyed with by 20 year olds so I’m also kind of angry that I got angry.
A win would have made a pretty good season, overall, despite blowout losses to USC and Oregon. Losing to UW, though, stopped that. UW is a team that is not as good as Cal – Cal should have won. And not only did Cal lose, they got stomped badly. So yeah, I was upset and angry that they lost. Not at anyone individually, or even at the team as a whole, just that it happened that way. Furious is a much stronger word for what I felt, but looking at the poll options, it was at least the same emotion (if only a completely different level) – whereas all the other options were completely different emotions, even if they were describing a more reasonable level of the given emotion.
So basically, blame whoever made the poll! It’s their fault. I’m furious at them for misunderstanding my emotions!
I agree that it seems silly to be angry at a team you root for and care about, but its the ugly flip side of the joy you feel after a great win like the Big Game this year. I try not to get mad at the Bears, and I was saddened after the the $C & Oregon losses, but as MB says, UW is not that good, and if we played well, we should have won.
I guess disgust is closest feeling I had, mainly I hate that it gives credence to the notion that Cal teams are chokers, I hated hearing all those “is Cal going to choke again like 2007” stories that showed up after the $C loss – I hate revisiting that pain.
its the ugly flip side of the joy you feel after a great win like the Big Game this year.
Eenteresting take. Without anger/fury/sadness, there is no great joy? Without rain, what’s a sunny day?
The Lack of Mack's Imposition Attacks My Disposition.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 14, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
furious?
extremely extremely annoyed I guess was my feeling. Very close to furious.
These are young guys, but this is the end of the regular season after they have apparently worked very hard with up and down results and getting better and better and had a great Big Game…and should be peaking further with focus and excitement and energy….and what in the world brought on such an apparent ‘whatever’ attitude…??
Not sure if the team was ‘reading their press’ before the Oregon game…let alone SC which followed…
and Tedford had managed it appeared to keep the team from imploding after SC and we get to the Big Game and hang in there and WIN!
With two weeks an inevitable let down should have been gotten past and we should have been UP and ready to Roll with UW….‘reading the predictions again’ seems to be what happened. What???? Player problem? Coaching problem?
Some teams apparently just don’t GET it! Or players just mentally tired?
totally totally annoyed that all the gains culminating in the Big Game win were just tossed away….
This season a loss has been enough to kind of spoil my weekend, but I’m getting better at coping.
The thing for me is just that the players on the field don’t owe me anything. What business do I have getting angry at a bunch of 19 and 20 year olds when they don’t meet my expectations? It just seems so petty.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
It's all well and good...
….for crappy games to serve as motivators for future games. But really good teams find other ways to motivate.
a hint of sarcasm there to be noticed
What did i tell you...didn't I say they would win? Yeah that's right I did didn't ? Wait.. what? They LOST?!?!?
the conference is stacked going into next season
I mean we have SEVEN teams going to bowl games this season and with Locker coming back and Erickson looking to retain his job, it will be a great season of football next year
What did i tell you...didn't I say they would win? Yeah that's right I did didn't ? Wait.. what? They LOST?!?!?
I voted Downcast
… but I understand furious.
It’s not just that we have high expectations of the Golden Bears. It’s that we don’t understand how the hell this could happen. There are a lot of possible explanations: trap game, looking to the bowls, flu, elicit gambling connections, replaced by crap people, etc. But none of those are the explanation, and I think a lot of fans want to know the answer.
Ignorance and a lack of understanding breed fury. And no one in the team press conferences could really give a good explanations. So I don’t mind people being mad at the unknown of it all. Being furious about the situation is understandable.
Being mad at a college football team, though – that seems stupid.
Stunningly, SBN put this on its front page or whatever that thing in the upper right hand corner leads to.
President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Maybe SBN is telling me something?
President Emperor Warlord Of The Sun!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
SBN is telling you “The Log Out button?” ?
I don’t get it.
I'm TwistNHook
by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 14, 2009 5:45 PM PST up reply actions
Okay I did but then I couldn’t comment, so I logged in, but either way I still don’t get what SBN was telling Twist.
I'm TwistNHook
by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 14, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions
The poll
It’s more about how the poll is constructed – the available options. People are having some anger though when there’s inconsistency; it appears the team can do well when it wants, so “what’s the problem?”.
I get hip-hopping-up-and-down pissed off and profanity laden livid at times
but it quickly transitions into banal disappointment.
alaska A residing in northern Idaho.

by 






















































