CGB Top 25 - Week 8
by ragnarok on Oct 27, 2009 4:15 AM PDT
in California Golden Bears Football
Email
Print |
||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama | |
| 2 | Florida | |
| 3 | Cincinnati | |
| 4 | Texas | |
| 5 | Southern Cal | |
| 6 | Boise State | |
| 7 | Iowa | |
A couple of near-upsets at the top ('Bama nearly gagged at home vs. Tennessee on the 3rd 4th Saturday in October, Florida let Mississippi State hang around far too long, USC got into a surprising shootout with Oregon State, and Iowa pulled another rabbit out of its hat to top Michigan State and stay perfect), but the CGB voters are unmoved. In a pure power poll, you might see Texas or Cincinnati climb to the top, but despite a couple blowout wins, neither did enough to overcome relatively weaker overall résumés.
| 8 | Oregon |  2 |
| 9 | LSU | 3 |
| 10 | TCU | 3 |
| 11 | Georgia Tech |  2 |
| 12 | Virginia Tech | 1 |
| 13 | Miami (Florida) | 5 |
Miami loses in overtime to Clemson -- not an unpardonable sin, especially given their overall record this year, but not someone a Top 10 team should be losing to -- and they drag fellow ACCers Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech down with them. Unless some craziness happens, I have a feeling all three of those teams will be rather tied at the hip this season. Oregon, LSU and TCU are the beneficiaries; TCU, in particular, finally put up a good win in clobbering BYU on the road (although Florida State already did that this year, and look where they are now...)
| 14 | Oklahoma State | |
| 15 | Penn State | 2 |
| 16 | South Carolina | 4 |
| 17 | Arizona | 1 |
| 18 | Pittsburgh | 1 |
| 19 | Houston | 2 |
Texas Tech and BYU lose -- and badly -- to tumble out of our poll. Everyone else gets to move up! Nothing really interesting to say here. None of these teams have really impressive résumés at this point, which is the main reason Miami didn't fall further.
| 20 | Utah | |
| 21 | Central Michigan | 2 |
| 22 | Ohio State | |
| 23 | Mississippi | |
| 24 | Navy | |
| 25 | Notre Dame | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
|---|---|---|
Utah, Ole Miss, and Navy are welcomed back to our poll. I really tried hard not to vote for Ohio State, only a week removed from losing to Purdue(!), but there really wasn't anyone else. I really wanted to stop at 20 teams, but the ballot calls for 25, so here are some teams. Enjoy.
Dropped Out: Texas Tech (#15), Brigham Young (#16), Arkansas (#24).
Texas Tech and BYU both lost, and lost hard. Tech was especially embarrassing, getting blown out by a previously hapless Texas A&M squad. Meanwhile, Ole Miss beat Arkansas to claim the Razorbacks' position near the bottom of our poll. Whoo.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Notre Dame again?
Surely there is another team out there that can end up at 25. How about Oregon State? Or, maybe Wisky? Sheesh, I’d rather see Furd up there than them.
On ATQ I'm known as JSoCal Oski
It's spelled J-etc
That's a bold statement...
I’d agree with OSU or Wisc, but Leland Jr.? really? I’m hoping for a 4 game slide out of these clowns…
Nothing would be sweeter than having them go all gung ho to start and then go all 2007 Cal in Oct/Nov, to finish at 5-7…
As long as ND doesn’t get to 9 wins and get to an undeserved BCS game, I’m ok with them being ranked… (Though I agree they shouldn’t be up there right now)
Undefeated in Southern California since Oct. 2009...
I’d like to see Furd crash and burn and not get their magical 6 wins too — but I am so freaking sick and tired of ND getting noticed for nothing other than their damned name that at this point I’d rather see that windbag Harbaugh get some props.
I think I hat too much. I got too much hat. I need help to hat less.
On ATQ I'm known as JSoCal Oski
It's spelled J-etc
I haven’t ranked Notre Dame once this year.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 27, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
The Notre Dame vote was mine. The bottom of my ballot actually went Notre Dame / Oregon State / Wisconsin, so I don’t really disagree with you. You’ve got a bunch of teams without a good win, but pretty decent losses — you really could have picked any of them. Of the three, I like Notre Dame the least, but I try not to let who I “like” influence my vote.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
For issues of transparency, here's the top 25.
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. USC
4. Texas
5. Cincinnati
6. Iowa
7. Boise State
8. Oregon
9. TCU
10. LSU
11. Georgia Tech
12. Oklahoma State
13. Virginia Tech
14. Penn St.
15. Miami (FL)
16. Pitt
17. Utah
18. South Carolina
19. Ohio State
20. Arizona
21. Ole Miss
22. Navy
23. Oklahoma
24. Central Michigan
25. BYU
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 27, 2009 8:56 AM PDT reply actions
*my top 25
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 27, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions
My Top 25
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Cincinnati
4. Texas
5. Boise State
6. Oregon
7. Iowa
8. USC
9. LSU
10. Houston
11. TCU
12. Georgia Tech
13. Virginia Tech
14. Miami
15. Arizona
16. Central Michigan
17. South Carolina
18. Oklahoma State
19. Pitt
20. Utah
21. Penn State
22. Notre Dame
23. Oregon State
24. Ohio State
25. Wisconsin
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
does anyone feel that Oklahoma is getting the easiest ride for a 3-loss team evair? I know, I know…but still.
Not that this relates to my previous sentences, but Cal football has done one thing right so far: they haven’t lost games to crappy teams. They’re slowly climbing back into this. In 2008, Michigan St finished in the top 25 and they beat NO ONE of importance. I could see that happening for this years Cal team…of course, I can also see the opposite if Cal keeps playing with a diarrhea defense.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Lost to BYU by 1, to Miami by 1, Texas by 3…although they do look worse after the way Miami and BYU tanked this weekend.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 27, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
A thought:
A little attention/respect should be paid to Pitt, who look downright scary. I mean, they’re still coached by Wannstache so they probably won’t break through to the BCS level any time soon (evidenced by the fact that their defense got torched by NC State, which itself pretty much sucks), but they’ve got a shockingly efficient quarterback, a future draft pick at wideout in Jonathon Baldwin, good depth in the trenches, and Jacquizz Rodgers mark.II at running back.
The most difficult part of their schedule is still ahead of them (Notre Dame, West Virginia, and Cincy over 4 weeks to end the season), but it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they beat Notre Dame and at least one of their conference rivals.
(The caveat is that I’ve only seen them beating up South Florida, but South Florida looked like a pretty good defensive team against Cincinnati and Pitt took ’em to the woodshed.)
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
I honestly haven’t seen very much Pitt football at all this year, and their résumé isn’t fantastic (wins over Navy and South Florida, both at home, are OK, but not fantastic, and losing to North Carolina State isn’t a bad loss, per se, but it’s not good). I’ll take another look, though, and their upcoming schedule does give them some potential juice to move up in the rankings.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Yeah my intention with that post maybe wasn’t to object to their ranking so much as to go “damn this team has talent.”
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines
Related FanPosts on California Golden Blogs
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Recent FanShots
About Us
• About the Golden Bloggers
• Our previous site @ Blogsome
• Avinash @ Bears Necessity
• Best of the Golden Blogs
• Golden Blogs Interviews
• HydroTech's Cal Football Analyses
• Ron Fimrite's Anatomy Of A Miracle
• CGB Weekly Guides
• GoldenBlogs' Community Guidelines
• GoldenBlogs' FAQ
• CGB GIF Army
Learn More About The California Golden Blogs Clothing Store
Pac-12 On SBN
Pacific Takes (Pac-12) NORTH AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)
UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)
CougCenter: (Washington State)
BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)
Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)
SOUTH
BruinsNation: (UCLA)
ConquestChronicles: (USC)
HouseOfSparky: (ASU)
Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)
TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)
Block U: (Utah)
Golden Bears Football Schedule
| Fresno St. | Sat 09/03 | W 36 - 21 |
@
Colorado
|
Sat 09/10 | W 36 - 33 |
| Presbyterian | Sat 09/17 | W 63 - 12 |
|
@
Washington
|
Sat 09/24 | L 23 - 31 |
|
@
Oregon
|
Thu 10/06 | L 15 - 43 |
|
USC
|
Thu 10/13 | L 9 - 30 |
|
Utah
|
Sat 10/22 | W 34 - 10 |
|
@
UCLA
|
Sat 10/29 | L 14 - 31 |
|
Washington St.
|
Sat 11/05 | W 30 - 7 |
|
Oregon St.
|
Sat 11/12 | W 23 - 6 |
|
@
Stanford
|
Sat 11/19 | L 28 - 31 |
|
@
Arizona St.
|
Fri 11/25 | W 47 - 38 |
|
@
Texas
|
Wed 12/28 | L 10 - 21 |
Pacific-12 Conference Standings
(updated 1.2.2012 at 11:12 PM PST)
| North | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
Oregon Ducks
|
8 | 1 | 12 | 2 |
|
Stanford Cardinal
|
8 | 1 | 11 | 2 |
|
Washington Huskies
|
5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
|
California Golden Bears
|
4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
|
Oregon St. Beavers
|
3 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
|
Washington St. Cougars
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| South | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
USC Trojans
|
7 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
|
UCLA Bruins
|
5 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|
Utah Utes
|
4 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
|
Arizona St. Sun Devils
|
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
Arizona Wildcats
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
|
Colorado Buffaloes
|
2 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
