Lost Weekend for Cal in the Southland
"So many reasons to hate L.A. So. Many. Reasons." - AndBears, after the game
Good riddance, LA. - Image via www.engin.umich.edu
Well, at least the Bears were in this one. The highlights (and lowlights):
- 16 and 9 for Jordan Wilkes. The 16 points are a career high, and I wouldn't be surprised if the 9 boards were as well.
- However, Wilkes left the game late with what looked like it might be a knee injury. Here's hoping it's nothing serious, given his injury history. So far, the Bears have been pretty fortunate on the injury front this year.
- Jamal Boykin goes off for 18 and 11, a double-double. Good stuff there.
- Not much outside the arc. A combined 8 points from Christopher and Robertson, including an 0-fer from 3. Overall, the Bears were just 2 of 16 from 3 tonight, an absurdly low total for this team.
These are both good teams. They're both flawed teams, however, probably bubble teams down the stretch. I think one of the two will make the tournament, but not both. The final score belied how close this game was, and I think had a couple of breaks gone the Bears' way, they certainly could have won this game. I don't think I learned anything new about the Bears today, except maybe that Jordan Wilkes is a better scorer than I gave him credit for. A tough loss, but not terribly unexpected. I think the Bears beat the Trojans at home, and after losing 4 of their last 5 games, they now enter an easier portion of the schedule (5 of the next 7 at home).
Besides, did you think the Bears would be 5-4 halfway through the conference schedule?
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Conference Play
Yeah, I thought we’d be 5-4 at this point. I really think we can go 6-3 in the second half of the schedule with wins over Washington State, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, USC, and Arizona.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 31, 2009 10:48 PM PST reply actions
You thought we'd be 5-4 at this point??
When did you make that prediction? I would have jumped at 5-4 before Pac-10 started, and after the 4-0 start, I would have pegged us at 6-3. 6 Wins in the back half seems really optimistic to me at this point, but Cal looked better today than they have since the UW game, in my opinion.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Five Wins
I thought Cal would’ve beaten Arizona, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, and then steal one on the road against somebody, specifically Stanford.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Feb 1, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions
That makes sense
I guess you were more optimisic than most of us. We had a good non-conference run, but we were still a team picked to finish 8th in conference. Before conference play started, I would have given us less than a 50-50 shot in beating Arizona at home, WSU on the road, and Stanford on the road. Realistically, I was pegging us at 3-6 or 4-5
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
So fucking frustrating.
USC won because of fluke shots that energized him. I felt we played better for pretty much the whole game (other than rebounding. dear jesus we were horrible tonight) than SC did. I’m just flattened. I don’t feel like doing anything right now. I feel the win was a fluke. ahh. Plus Jordan Wilkes has a three game stretch where he actually shows a pulse (Oregon game was previous best game of his career, topped tonight) and then of course he gets injured.
This is my last game, I don't care about my body.
I will second that.
USC had a bunch of flukey buckets in the second half. Sometimes that happens (see Stanford vs Cal 2 weeks ago). Hopefully we will be on the other end of it one of these days.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
when you’re an outside shooting team and you’re not making your outside shots, your deficiencies in the middle are going to show up. Our shots have stopped falling as often as they did at the start of the season, and we don’t have anywhere else to go with the ball when Christopher and Randle aren’t scoring.
I like this team but I think we’re showing that we are who we thought we were. Crown ’em if you want to.
Can I crown them?
TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Crown Them
Crown them if you want to, TwistNHook.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Feb 1, 2009 9:43 AM PST up reply actions
“So Many Reasons To Hate Ragnarok. So. Many. Reasons.” -AndBears, after Ragnarok forgot to take out the trash.
TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Wilkes is okay and should play Thursday against Washington. His injury was only a minor ankle injury.
"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.
very good news
y’know, as much as this team has benefited from the coaching change this year, i think they’ve also been boosted, in a large part, by the lack of season-ending injuries that plagued the Bears over Braun’s final few years. one could argue that, with a healthy lineup, Braun would still be coaching here instead of at Rice.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
what? were his feelings hurt?
I expected a torn ACL with that reaction.
Damn Taj Gibson knocked him right out of the game.
Sorry, Jordan… you played a great game and it was a pleasure to watch. I hope you are doing well.
You sure scared your Jamal and Omar – seen on TV behind you. Me too.
5 - 4? Yeah
As much as I wanted and thought we could win yesterday, 5-4 and tied for 3rd at the halfway point is pretty damn good. Especially considering how every team seems able to beat any other team (well, other than Oregon).
Yesterday was a bad day for the outside game to go away, but part of that is due to $C’’s defense. And yeah, they got some lucky bounces, but that’s not what won the game for them.
The really good news is that other than Ucla, we’ve been “in” every conference game this year, and it wouldn’t have taken much for us to be sitting at 7-2 or even 8-1 right now.
I’m still happy about the effort of the team, and am looking forward to a bit of payback in the 2nd half.
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
I was thinking about Daniel Hackett
I was thinking how much I didn’t like him, how he frustrates on Offense with improbably shots, timely shots, drives that draw fouls at the end of the game. He hit the shot just before halftime against Cal. He scored that 3 point play by posting up Randle (and 1) at the end. He made an acrobatic reverse layup at the end, too. Dammit. He also frustrates on defense, playing solid and solidly rough. It makes me just want to punch him in the face. Then, I stopped and listened to him in the postgame interview. I never knew he had an Italian accent…(?) Yes, I knew his dad played professionally in Italy, and that he spoke Italian. But he speaks English with a slight accent. Funny.
I stopped and asked myself why I hated him so much. I realized he was exactly the kind of player I would like to have on my team. Tough, Committed. Leader. I tried to picture him in a Cal uniform, speaking with that accent. I’d love it. Ex-Pat comes home and does us proud.
Well, I still won’t root for the guy, but at least I don’t have to hate him, like I do those SC fans in the stands. I’d punch them in the face. (not really, but you know what I mean.)
Peace.
I would absolutely have predicted a 5-4 record
Given where they stood efficiency-wise coming into the Pac-10 season, 5-4 is an outright disappointment.
You can’t listen to the media on this… the media doesn’t know its ass from its elbow when ranking teams. They think stats like points per game are actually meaningful. They overvalue reputation, undervalue player experience, overvalue wins against crappy teams and undervalue wins against good ones (especially on the road). With some exceptions (like Andy Glockner— good man, knows what he’s talking about), press coverage of college hoops is as disastrous as in any other sport.
Here’s the deal— Cal needs to win 5 out of the next 6 games to feel comfortable, because the last 3 are home against UCLA, at ASU, and the Dr. Jekyll (i.e. home) version of Arizona. In a bubble head-to-head Cal’s resume is going to look good to the committee compared to what a lot of those schools are bringing to the table, but they won’t even get there if they can’t manage at least a .500 conference record.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
I don't know
5-4 through the first half of conference play, during which they played 5 road games and played away games against the top three teams in the conference seems pretty good to me. Especially considering what we did last year and who we lost.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
You're Watching the Wrong Games
I went to the Cal-USC basketball game on Saturday and it was a terrific! A dramatic last-second win by the Bears. I also went to the Cal-Stanfurd basketball game a couple of weeks ago. Another dramatic last-second Cal win. It was also one of the most exciting sporting events I’ve ever attended. (And I was actually in Memorial Stadium on November 20, 1982 and saw “The Play” in person, so I know a little something about exciting sporting events.) Now our basketball team is ranked #3 in the nation. I think you folks are watching the wrong games. While the Stanfurd game was close to a sell-out, there were less than 3,000 at the USC game. Get out there and show our women some support – they deserve it, plus it’s a lot of fun. (And at $10 for adults and, on Saturdays, $1 for anyone under 18, it’s the best bargain in sports.) Go Bears!

by 


















