How To React To A Blowout
Well, that was something, now wasn't it?
66-3.
Seriously? Seriously.
That's just crazy. As a Cal fan, I don't even know how to react. Yesterday was easy. Lots of drinking and celebrating. (I must admit, where I was watching the game, we were late getting back to the second half because we were having too much fun playing 'Rock Band'. Nobody really minded.)
Today, however, it's more difficult. I sat down today to try and write something intelligent about yesterday's game, and I found myself a little stuck. Which way should I go? On one hand, it's hard to be anything but overwhelmingly positive about such a lopsided blowout. Touchdowns came seemingly at will for the Bears on offense, and the defense nearly pitched a shutout with the help of four interceptions. What kind of ungrateful fans would complain about such a performance?
However, any Cal fans who remember last year's collapse under the weight of our own hubris (not to mention the pre-Tedford fans who are always waiting for Cal's other cleat to drop, so to speak) are immediately wary of such success. No one wants to get caught flat-footed when the good times come to an end, so the skeptics among us search for the early warning signs of failure, whether they're there or not.
As Cal fans, how do we handle success?
Yesterday's blowout of Washington State was an annihilation of Trojan-like proportions. Indeed, it's hard to look at a score like 66-3 and not immediately think of USC's current run of dominance. The early barrage of touchdowns after three- or four-play drives, the stifling, turnover-hawing defense, and the starters taking the second half off while the backups continued to dominate all invite comparisons to Pete Carroll's best teams. So let's compare:
Over the past seven years, USC has blown out a number of opponents in impressive fashion; their 52-7 dismantling of Virginia to open this season is only the latest example, not the most impressive. Still, the Bears' 66 points equals the largest point total Carroll's teams have ever racked up in a Pac-10 conference game, a 66-19 embarrassment of UCLA in 2005. Really, the game wasn't even that close, as the score was already 59-6 late in the fourth quarter before a pair of Bruin touchdowns closed the gap somewhat. (It's hard to say that any one game got Karl Dorrell fired, but I think that game played a large part.) Even USC's biggest blowout, a 70-17 destruction of Arkansas earlier that year, fell short of Cal's margin of victory yesterday by 10 points; not even the vaunted Bush/Leinart teams ever defeated an opponent by nine touchdowns.
Here's some more fun facts from yesterday's game: Cal had as many touchdowns (9) as Washington State had first downs (and WSU needed a personal foul from Tyson Alualu to get one of those). In fact, the Cougs' offense was shut down so completely that after Washington State opened the second half by driving down to the Cal 13 yard line (only to throw an interception to Bernard Hicks), they would not even get a first down the rest of the game. Jahvid Best ran for 200 yards all by his lonesome, 33 more yards than the Cougs had in total offense (167). In fact, he had two touchdown runs (for 86 and 80 yards, respectively) that were longer than the Cougs entire rushing total (57).
The astounding numbers don't stop there. Syd'Quan Thompson had nearly as many yards returning intercepted Coug passes (108) as Washington State had passing to their own players (110). More signs of futility: WSU's yards per pass was bad (3.7), but not as bad as their yards per rush (1.6) or their third-down conversion rate (1 for 13). If Washington State is looking for some consolation, all I can offer is that the Cougars couldn't possibly play any worse than they did on Saturday; by the law of averages, they almost have to get better.
Well, if those statistics make you deliriously optimistic, I don't know what will. Still, I think by now Cal fans now what inevitably follows delirous optimism: crushing reminders of reality. For those of you wary of this early taste of success and weary of the the letdown of unexpected failure, there ARE some nits you could pick with yesterday's performance.
First off, Cal's passing game, especially with Riley under center, was less than spectacular: just 6/14 passing for 51 yards and a score. Granted, Riley hardly had time to get into much of a rhythm, as Cal's first three drives took just 1, 2, and 7 plays to score touchdowns, with Riley only attempting 4 passes. But on the next three possessions, Cal's offense goes 3 and out, and if Cal's defense and special teams doesn't come through, we could have had a game on our hands. Luckily, Longshore came on in relief, completing 7 of 8 passes for 53 yards (more than Riley!).
Further, Cal's kickoff coverage was still pretty pedestrian, and they did allow a return to Cal's own 22 yard line, which led directly to Wazzu's only points on the day. (At least, with all of Cal's scoring, they got lots of practice!) More worrisome, Bryan Anger didn't look the same as he did against Michigan State -- I hope his sprained knee doesn't lead to lingering ill effects.
Look, if you want to worry about Cal's issues and areas in need of improvement -- minor or not -- that's fine. I'm sure Coach Tedford is, and hopefully the team is too. If 66-3 makes them too cocky, we WILL see them get their comeupance eventually. But for me, this win is pretty darn encouraging, and at least for this week, I'm going to enjoy it. You should too. They'll be plenty to worry over next Saturday -- there always is.
27 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The hippies reaction to getting blown out by UCPD and chainsaws:
(There’s no DBD so I’ll put it here.)
Dear friends of the Grove, may she rest in peace:
As you know the Oak Grove is gone, but there are still four tree-sitters perched in a redwood tree.
UC Police have threatened to physically extract the tree-sitters early tomorrow (Monday) morning. Tree-sit supporters are asking all of those who love(d) the grove to please come and bear witness starting at 8am Monday morning. Please call the ground support phone at 510 938 2109 for questions.
Sincerely,
What’s Left of the Oak Grove
Go Bears!
by RollOnYouBears667 on Sep 7, 2008 10:36 PM PDT reply actions
Fuck those hippie bitches. I am glad we won, and rightfully so, but I’ll likely spend 25 g’s on anger management because of them!
I think we'll be alright...
I dunno why, but I don’t think a win like this is going to make the team too overconfident. Sure, it’s great to get a big win, but it wasn’t quite a true big-school blowout. In score – most definitely. But it’s not like we crushed a team who played their best but was just overmatched. Washington State made so many basic mistakes, had so many mental lapses, shot themselves in the foot so many times, that they have to take some of the blame for the way the game went. I think about the illegal formation penalty they received for having too few men on the line. That’s not Wazzu being bested by a superior team – that’s a Pop Warner brain fart. I mean, the commentators asked the sideline reporter, in her experience as a high-school referee, how the officials can help prevent that sort of thing. When a high-school referee is giving tips to a Pac-10 team on how to line up… wow. Now some would argue that those mental lapses could be due to lack of confidence after being dominated so early in the game. But it was more than that. New coach, new system, young team – heck, they hadn’t implemented half their offensive playbook yet, ‘cause that’s all the kids could handle. Those issues definitely played a role in the game, and I think our team knows that (or at least our coaches do).
This is not to take away from our team’s accomplishments – the O-line was amazing, Best and Vareen did what they do best, Nate and Boateng got some confidence back, even Mansion got in on the fun. And it was certainly a fun game to watch (though i was drifting away in the 4th quarter). I’m just saying that a victory like the one over Tennessee would do more to make a team overconfident than one like this.
Overall, i think this game was a good one for our team – it showed in a BIG way where we are already starting to gel and exceed expectations, but it also gave us on opportunity to test, without any real risk, where we need to improve (i.e. passing game, I agree with you).
As Cal fans, I like to think that we can be in a good place – a state of cautious optimism. I, being a pre-Tedfordite, am learning to accept the steady success of our football program, and am finally getting to a place where I don’t have to expect the worst. The events of last year, as you stated, will definitely keep us from getting too cocky. So I think this year will be a good middle ground for everyone.
by BearStage on Sep 7, 2008 11:00 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree 100% with bearstage
as pre Coach Joe Kapp cal fan, the long term program health is just now starting to sink in.
by Rocksanddirt on Sep 8, 2008 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
I am a post-Holmoe product
But I share your wary feelings because it’s my luck that any team I like tends do real well and then produce some heart breakers.
In other words, Go Bears!
for those of you that love great blocking
watch the very first play from scrimmage (Jahvid’s first 80 yard TD run). It’s a simple trap play with a pulling weakside guard. In this case, the weakside guard is our left guard, Chris Guarnero. He creates the upper part of the huge hole while Mitchell Schwartz, our right tackle, clears out the lower part. These two devastating blocks created an alley that would have allowed you or me to pick up 5 yards. And, not surprisingly, these are the two new starters I mentioned in my Cal/MSU review. These guys look fantastic: see for yourself here.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
“Nah, forget the spin moves and reverses and 50-yd TD bombs, I want me some BLOCKING!”
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 8, 2008 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Nits and how to pick them
I’ll admit to being one of those Old Blues for whom success of this nature automatically raises the defensive shields. It’s one of thos survival instincts, like the third eyelid in sharks, that were developed during the Kapp days, and later perfected in the Gilbertson era (and if you thought Holmoe was bad …).
Anyway, the systematic dismantling of Wazzu was a thing of beauty. However the offensive performance aside from home-run plays was a nightmare. The running game stagnated, Riley couldn’t hit water if he threw the ball off the pier, and the O-line looked like they may have been more than a little confused. If not for Wazzu’s impotent offense and our macho defense, who knows what would have happened after 21 – 0?
But I’m thinking that maybe the offense’s problems was the fact that they never needed to really rev up, and so they played a bit sloppy. That’s good, because it means the offense really isn’t showing problems. That’s bad because they can’t ever afford to leave their heads on the bench.
Either way, I am dead sure Tedford saw what we cynics did, and is addressing it in elevated volume right now.
Go Bears!
I didn't see the game but...
“Riley couldn’t hit water if he threw the ball off the pier” sounds a bit too harsh. I’d reserve that comment for either Joe Ayoob and his 1 for 10 debut as a Golden Bear (I don’t remember the actual #s, but it was a omen of things to come for sure) or for any Justin Vedder game in the 97 or 98 season.
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory...
by Hey Bowles Hall! on Sep 8, 2008 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I listened to 810 right after the game, Tedford definitely mentioned issues regarding the offense and special teams (KR).
Also, he sounds a lot like Tommy Chong.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 8, 2008 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions
'Old Blue' SoCalOski, I feel your pessimism...
I guess I’m a ‘semi-Old’ Blue, being 33, and I’ve been following the bears for 20 years now (being a bay area native). I too have seen far too many temporary highs, only to be immediately followed by crushing lows. As a long time Cal fan, you learn to keep your gaurd up to prevent raised hopes and expectations, because history has shown you will only to be let down hard. Kind like a guy/girl who has been hurt one too many times in past relationships and now puts up an emotional ‘wall’ with whomever they date so as not to be hurt again. For me, Cal football is that girl who has hurt me many times in the past, so until she commits to this relationship (Rose Bowl baby!), I’ll continue having my emotional wall up and find reasons to prevent us from getting ‘too’ close.
Having said that, I’m a bit excited about our win over WASSU. I think our O-line did great, our ‘lightning and lightning’ running backs were awesome, our D line and linebackers were solid, Syd-stud was astounding, and I saw definite improvement from the rest of the secondary.
I think you were a little too rough on Riley, however. He did struggle a but, especially on the deep passes, but his shorter passing game was efficient and he completed one very nice deep pass that was called back (was it due to a holding penalty? i can’t remember). He also had a very nice ‘thread the needle’ pass between 2 defenders which impressed me. Also, on the busted run play where he went one way and Vereen went the other, the Chronicle reported that Vereen didn’t hear Riley’s audible, so people shouldn’t really blame Riley for that one (not to mention he turned a flubbed play into a great scramble for positive yardage!) Overall I’d say even Riley did well, with the exception of some of his deep passes. But I have faith he can and will improve in that area.
by SonofCalifornia on Sep 8, 2008 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
By the way, glad to see this game vaulted us into the top 25!
by SonofCalifornia on Sep 8, 2008 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions
I wonder if all the USC comparisons will be null and void after they have their turn with WSU this year?
hah!
I’ll admit to being one of those Old Blues for whom success of this nature automatically raises the defensive shields. It’s one of thos survival instincts, like the third eyelid in sharks, that were developed during the Kapp days, and later perfected in the Gilbertson era (and if you thought Holmoe was bad …).
Okay, that has to be one of the funniest things I’ve ever read on a football blog. For ourselves, we take care of it before each game with a ritualistic question: “do we have a chance to win today?” followed by “we’re not favored, are we?” “yes” “uh-oh”
That way we’re almost never disappointed anymore.
Same here
I think that there are two forces conspiring against me this year…
(1) Cal, including myself, fans are always scared by success. This is just normal pessimism. But double that after last season, and we have pessimism of an abnormal variety.
(2) The fact that through two games, there really isn’t a whole lot to criticize. The MSU game was a nice win over a decent team, that ended up being closer in score than it really was on the field. The WSU game was an absolute blowout.
In conjunction it is an uneasy feeling. This is only going to get worse as we play two more teams that are absolute crap of the WSU variety the next two games. Really, my guess is we have another month before we really understand where this season is going. (And even then, beating ASU at home hasn’t exactly been a great indicator in the past.)
"And even then, beating ASU at home hasn’t exactly been a great indicator in the past."
Agreed. Let’s just say I’m happy to have Zona St, UCLA, and Oregon at home this year.
by SonofCalifornia on Sep 8, 2008 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions
let's just take it one game at a time....
Next game: Maryland!
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory...
by Hey Bowles Hall! on Sep 8, 2008 11:58 AM PDT reply actions
Cal is a tease
As a 30 yr old ‘Old Blue’, my first real memories of Cal was that season in the early 90s when we started off 5-0 or 6-0 and pretty high up in the rankings before getting upended by UW. Our only other loss that year was to stanfurd (damn Tommy Vardell) and I think we ended up in the Citrus Bowl .. Then Snyder got away and then came the dark ages (again, for those older than I) .. Mooch tease us again with a 5-0 start before we crash landed in a similar fashion to last year to finish 6-6. I remember the embarrassment of ‘The 4th Quarter is ours!’ (oh wait, crap, no it isn’t) .. I’ve lost track of how many games against teams we should’ve beat or teams we should be competitve vs, that have went down to a tense 4th quarter .. In fact there’s a very fine line between a typical Cal win (decided in the last couple minutes by hanging on for dear life) and a typical Cal loss (so close in the end, but missed opportunities) .. I’ve even seen the dark ere of the 7 yr losing streak to the junior college ….
One could say I’ve my rooting heart is calloused because I’ve seen every season end up short of the ultimate destination. Every October and November loss delays the trip to Pasadena another year. After all this, I can’t be faulted if I try not to become to emotionally invested until we’re 10-0. I will always bleed blue and gold, but Cal will always be the girlfriend that teases me to no end while I keep on hoping for that happy ending.

by 


















































