Why I hate the 'Conference Wars'
Yesterday we can all agree was a disaster for the Pac-Ten. With the exception of USC and Orgeon State, pretty much every team played well below what people thought that team was capable of. Perhaps worse, even , is that USC's convincing win over Ohio State will simply reinforce the 'USC is the only team in the Pac 10 worth a damn' narrative.
And yet, two weeks ago everything was totally different. USC totally waxed Virginia on the road. Stanford was relevant again after beating perennial bowl bound OSU. Cal beat an upper tier Big 10 team by more than the final score indicated. Oregon, ASU and Arizona were blowing teams out of the water. Washington took a BCS busting contender to the last play and got screwd by the zebras. And lest we forget, UCLA beat a defending SEC title game participant.
So which is it? How can our perception be so radically changed? Are things really that different? The bottom line is that each Pac-ten team plays three games out of conference each year, and those three games are the only games that matter (until bowl season) in deciding B.S. 'Conference Wars' pecking order. We let a very small and oftentime meaningless sample size highjack the college football narrative every single year. DURR the ACC sucks and Kal lost so they must suck even more l0sers!!11
I hate reading headlines that seem to indicate that somehow Maryland or UNLV somehow beat an entire conference yesterday. It just feels like provincialism and low-grade, lazy analysis is taking over in place of meaningful, 'how does team A stack up against team B' analysis.
And of course, come bowl season, a team from a conference that 'loses' the war (everyone outside of the Big 12 and SEC, apparently) will beat a supposedly better team from those two conferences and fans and talking heads will act totally surprised and amazed because conference affiliation has superseded all other more important factors in deciding who wins a football game.
OK, rant over - until I see the next headline about a 'Pac 10 apocalypse'
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
12 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Amen
A big group of people on the internet, even if they aren’t in the MSM, seems to be coming around the idea that games are played between teams and not conferences, and that nothing more than a W for one team and a L for another can really be drawn from a loss.
The only bad loss really was ASU. Oregon won on the road against a BCS team. Cal lost on the road against a BCS team that beat two Top 10 teams last year. Washington was a massive underdog and played like it. UCLA’s ineptitude against BYU is balanced by their win over Tennessee. Arizona sucks. Washington State sucks. Stanford sucks. And all three of those teams were playing non-conference games on the road.
Yes, it is a bad day for the conference, but in the end, that is pretty much a coincidence of the fact that the Pac-10 isn’t afraid to play good competition.
Fortunately for the Pac-10, we play nine real conference games. Everyone can prove our worth by going out and beating USC. Everyone should be a Pac-10 football fan by enjoying Pac-10 football, not by arguing the relative worth as a conference.
"Bad loss"
I beg to differ. Cal losing to Maryland the way they did was pretty bad.
The Bear Will Not Quit
The Bear Will Not Die
The perception is that it is an awful loss
But compared to losses like Texas A&M losing to Arkansas State, it isn’t remotely in the same ballpark.
Losing to Maryland looks bad now, but my suspicion (and I could be proven totally wrong) is that when we look back on it at the end of the year, it won’t look nearly as bad.
Maryland will probably win 6 to 8 games
I’m not terribly angry about the fact we lost to Maryland. They are totally schizo, like UCLA last season.
by BearsNecessity on Sep 14, 2008 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree that the perception is that it is an awful loss
I think I said this in another thread, but the fact that Maryland loss last week to Middle Tennessee State is, In my opinion, what makes this loss so “bad” for so many people. The thought is: how could we lose to a team that lost to MTST? Well, I think the answer is simple. Maryland is better than they’ve showed the prior two weeks but they’ve been playing down to their opponents. They didn’t do that against us. Furthermore, Maryland actually does have some decently talented players on their team (offense and defense).
Anyways, if Maryland hadn’t lost to MTST last week, it would have changed our expectations of them for this game to the point where if we did lose we would be saying we lost to a decent ACC team on a tough road game.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Yeah we were saying the same thing about our team last season after we lost to UCLA….after they lost to Notre Dame…at home. But the loss wasn’t a sign of things to come.
Oh. Wait.
That doesn’t sound so good.
by BearsNecessity on Sep 14, 2008 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree. Perception is reality here. But it doesnt matter. As long as Cal takes care of its own bizness, the perception will change over time. Moreover, perception on 9.15.08 is meaningless. So, let’s stop worrying about whether the SEC is #1 or whatever.
It used to matter more, because the BCS didn’t exist with its generally by the book rankings. Now, it does exist and so if you win, generally, you are in. It’s not perfect. But it’s improved.
I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Hadn't thought about that.
We let a very small and oftentime meaningless sample size highjack the college football narrative every single year.
You are correct. We have let this insignificant sample size dictate our respect for our team and our conference. We know how we play, and the small but innumerable differences between this game and others (if not, this blog would be a lot less interesting…), but we let a big W or a big L determine the rest of it.
Unfortunately, Friday night I was in a bar in DC and was arguing — with quite articulate drunken arguments — with an SEC-is-best fan. All I was trying to do was get some respect to the Pac-10. We parted with agree-to-disagree, and then Saturday happened, and I felt like a jackass because some guy, somewhere, who I’ll never see again, seemed to win the argument. Well, that’s my burden and I won’t let it keep me from visiting the East Coast in the future.
AndBears, we are all family here. Your burden is our burden.
Speaking of which, thanks for that frigging burden. Le sigh!
I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
If you were expecting me to be an expert in talking football...
well, you’re just as foolish as Maharg. Thank the Tedford no one listens to me!



















































