California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Post-Maryland Thoughts: Cal 27, Maryland 35

So, there are a lot of reasons for why we lost today. 

Sp-california_ma_0499133517_medium

via imgs.sfgate.com

Let's start with the refs.  They certainly didn't help.  Bad calls: (1) Holding on Teofilo later in the game when he wasn't holding; (2) facemask call on Rulon when there was no facemask; (3) non-call safety depriving Cal of 2 points and another possession; (4) no false start call on Maryland late in the 4th quarter when Cal was trying to get the ball back... I'm sure there were others.

But we can't just blame the refs.  In fact, as bad as some of the calls were today, the team itself played worse than the refereeing. 

Let's start with the many reasons why:

(1) Bad OL blocking.  Some might blame Jahvid Best.  Afterall, he only had 25 yards and a 2.5 yard average.  But astute fans would have noticed nothing was wrong with Best but instead the problem was with the OL.  There was nary a sliver of daylight for Best today. 

(2) Riley's slow start.  Today's game was a big test for Riley - starting a somewhat big away game with a hostile crowd in the early morning.  Plus, we wanted to see Riley bounce back from his overthrow-athon last game.  Well, unfortunately, Riley started out slow.  A few overthrows meant zero chance of conversions.

(3) Young WRs.  You know, it's always hard to critique the WRs because they're always off the screen and thus you can't see them, but with a young group of WRs they almost always have a few problems with running routes, reading defenses, and in plain language: just getting open.  Today was probably one of those days when the WRs were just getting blanketed and couldn't really break free.

(4) On defense, we couldn't stop their basic power run scheme.  I mean, they KILLED us with their basic power run pulling guard scheme.  Our defensive guys weren't flowing to the ball, they were getting picked up by the blockers... ugly all around.

Star-divide

(5) Zone coverage.  Our zones were getting pickd apart pretty darn well today.  But there's not a lot we can do really other than get a faster pass rush, and perhaps have better anticipation on passes.  Because we got picked apart in zones necessarily mean we should switch to man?  Not really.  There seems to be a huge dislike of zone coverage by many Cal fans.  The reasoning seems to be that zone coverages don't work.  Well, today they didn't, but zone does work and has in the past in previous years.  In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if more than 50% of our INTs in the past 3 years were from zone coverages rather than man coverages.  Anyways, we did use man coverages today too and Maryland threw a touchdown on us when we did.  Both types of coverage work and sometimes they don't work either. 

(6) Pass rush.  Well, we seemed to have a few rare plays of decent pressure, and even a few sacks, but for the most part we just couldn't seem to get Chris Turner rattled.  He was 15-19 for the day and threw 2 TDs.  Plain and simple, Turner played like a stud today.  He threw some great passes and played tough. 

(7) Run defense.  Did I already touch on this?  Well, I'll say again... Maryland's runningbacks averaged 4.6 and 6.3 yards per carry.  Holy hell.  4.6 is good.  6.3 is reaching Marshawn-esque.  Good god we were getting gashed.  Sort of reminded me of the first quarter of the Armed Forces Bowl last year.

(8) Weather.  I'm not a big fan of the whole heat and humidity argument - that our players aren't used to the heat and we were shocked by it or something and we got our panties in a bunch because the humidity was 80% or something.  I mean, yes, it has an effect but I think the weather was pretty minimal in our loss today.  Instead, I think the...

(9) Time change was a bigger factor.  Tedford flew out the team on Friday after supposedly trying to acclimate the team to east coast time here in CA.  Frankly, I didn't like this decision.  I would rather fly out the team on Thursday.  One of Tedford's reasons was that he doesn't like going out early because there just seems to be too much dead time.  Well, I'd rather have too much dead time than having players not acclimated for the time change.  The players seemed a little dreary in the first half.  In contrast, it didn't seem like it was until the second half when we were getting our butts kicked for a good 1.5 hours that the team started to show a little life, and energy. 

(10) Coverage sacks & bad sacks.  So we gave up like 6 or 7 sacks today I think.  Some were "coverage sacks" meaning that the QB has to hold on to the ball longer than he should due to the fact that the defense has all the WRs covered and thus is sacked.  I think there were clearly 3-4 coverage sacks this game.  I think Riley has to sort of learn that the ball has to be gone by a certain time.  This is one aspect of QBing that Tedford emphasizes (I know myself since I heard him preaching getting the ball out on time all the time in practices). 

Sp-cal14_phforga_0499133508_medium

via imgs.sfgate.com

On the other hand, Cal clearly had some plain sacks given up due to getting beat on the line.  Most noticeably, I think we were getting beat at RG and LT.  Most especially on the blind side, Teofilo seemed to be having a really tough time dealing with Maryland's RE.  Overall, pass blocking was not good.

(11) Riley vs. Good Defense.  I wrote this in our Previewing the Season: Maryland post earlier this season:

Speaking of the 3-4, while our 3-4 is getting put to the test against Maryland's tendency to run, our offense is going to be going up against Maryland's 3-4 defense.  The last time Cal faced a 3-4 defense was against Air Force last year in the bowl game.  We all know what happened that game - we blew up Air Force's secondary and zone coverages.  Now we'll have to see if we can do that again but against BCS quality players.  To wit: Terp MLB and senior Dave Philistin appears to be the stud of linebackers who tallied 124 tackles last year; SLB and senior Moise Fokou started all last year and logged 83 tackles; CB and senior Kevin Barnes has 4.45 speed and tallied 65 tackles in the secondary; and starting at FS for the Terps will probably be the very very highly touted transfer and former Southern Cal Trojan Antwine Perez.  These guys aren't your average Air Force cadets.  These guys can definitely put up a good fight for the Cal offense.

Well, the big point I was trying to make was that Maryland's defense has some pretty good players on it and it would be interesting to see how Riley (especially) would perform against a better defense than the Air Force defense.  Riley carved up Air Force pretty bad but the AF defenders weren't half the players that Maryland has on defense.  Anyways, Riley and the WRs seemed to have a much tougher time against Maryland's better defense.

*****

The positives.  Look, let's try and be positive.  Today was a bad game, but most of our expectations of us blowing out Maryland was due to Maryland sucking it up their past two games rather than because of our own team.  We knew we were a decent team that performed very very well last week but we also were playing WSU who is as bad as Duke. 

So my point is that if it weren't for Maryland sucking it up the past two weeks, we'd have expectations that this game would have been close.  After Maryland lost to Middle Tennessee State last week, they came out with a chip on their shoulder and something to prove.  They looked energized at pre-game and brought a better game to the table than they did last week.

Anyways, back to the positives:

(1) Riley did get into a groove.  It took him nearly 3 quarters but he finally did.  So, it's not like he played 4 quarters of mediocre play.  It was like 1 quarter of sub-par play, 2 quarters of okay play, and 1 quarter of above average play.  In the end, Riley was 33 out of 58 for the day (56.9%) which isn't great or good - more like "eh." 

(2) The 4th quarter was good passing practice.  Nothing is quite like a real game against a real defense.  Being down and having to pass every play was good practice for Riley and the WRs.  In the future, if Cal is down again and needs to pass to comeback, I'm glad we'll have some prior experience. 

Sp-california_ma_0499133509_medium

via imgs.sfgate.com

(3) I'm trying to say something positive about the defense but I'm not sure I can.  They just didn't seem to elevate their play later in the 4th quarter.  I know they were trying when the offense started putting up points but they just gave up another rushing touchdown right off the bat after our first onside kick. 

(4) Riley's leadership.  Okay, this is possibly the biggest benefit of today.  On the sidelines, Riley could clearly be seen pumping up his teammates, and trying to rally the troops.  That's what we need.  We need that Brett Favre kind of guy (without all the interceptions) who can rally the troops, spark a comeback, and inspire hope. 

Anyways, these are my post game thoughts.

Yes, today sucked but I don't think we need to panic.  We all thought Maryland was worse than they were and we were wrong.  They played down to their opponents the first few games and we got surprised by them early and were affected by the time change. 

Keep positive.  The sky is not falling.

Poll
How are you feeling after this game?
Devastated, because Cal lost and a Cal loss is always devastating.
128 votes
Depressed, because Cal lost to a supposedly inferior team
264 votes
Strangely happy, because this might be an important wake up call for the team and hey we didn't look that bad at the end there
91 votes
Happy, because you are a fan of a visiting Pac10 team
10 votes

493 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 167 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

At least we tightened up the score in the end so it doesn’t look so bad as it was…

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 13, 2008 1:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey how do we change the ticker dealie on the left there?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

done

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Sep 13, 2008 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey can you make a pass at your commanding officer?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is too soon to comment here. I will wait till after the SC game and I have sobered up/.////////////////……………….

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 1:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You get sober?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not real knowledgeable on playcalling and whatnot, but it seems to me that a lot of our offensive plays were…underwhelming. Runs up the middle and skimpy screen passes. I think our team can do much better (hence the 4th quarter), but they don’t get the chance.

Thoughts?

Vote DAN MOGULOF for Mayor of Berkeley

by bears'R'us on Sep 13, 2008 1:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think ultimately its execution. Cal failed to execute on enough of those plays that the calling itself didn’t seem all that odious.

We did have a LOT of trouble with screens, though.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You pretty much wrote everything that was in my notes

I would add one thing… Luck… they got lucky on so many different plays today… seemed as though the stars were aligned for them today. The refs were not seeing anything our way. The safety was huge because we could have really used one more possession and the two points.

1) Offensive line: I think the primary reason we lost was our OL lost the LOS battle. Our offense is based on running it directly at them… Terps were stuffing the hole early… so we started some zone running to the side and they sliced through the blockers… then we started getting creative and screening etc… they basically took out half of our gameplan. Norris and Chet were not playing well and Mack was just ok. I just think they were dead tired.

2) They were dead tired. I could see it. I seriously was afraid of this too. When I travel cross country I never adjust my sleep times like the team did. It works if you can actually get to sleep early, but these are college kids and they can’t hit the sack that early… so it was basically three days of sleep torture. It’s best just to hit the sack early the day before… minimize the torture.

This affected everything. Our LBs were not able to shed blocks and were being pushed backwards. We couldn’t tackle for shit. Our OL men couldn’t push back the DL. We not only looked slow and sluggish… we were. Fatigue literally cascaded down to affect every aspect of the game.

3) DL could not move laterally: Did you guys notice how many slow zone runs they used against us? Given our fast LBs and our 3-4 defense, I was shocked. However for some reason everyone was so tired these slow zone runs kept getting blocked well and we’d lose containment around the edge. Scott’s first TD was a perfect example of this.

4) Nobody was open: I believe 4 of the 5 sacks were coverage sacks. Riley would sit in the pocket… look… and look and keep looking and would then scramble. Even when he wasn’t sacked, he had nobody to throw to until the Terps went into safe mode in the 4th quarter. Coach Tedford wanted to switch to more physical receivers but he’s got to realize that it takes more creativity in the routes and play-calling to get big guys open consistently.

For some reason the zone is working well against us and it’s probably the smart thing to do given our big-play ability with the running backs. In response we need to pick apart the soft areas of the zone, but how come our WRs are not finding them?

===

I saw many positive things as well… as you have mentioned. I would say the “leadership” factor you point out was the thing that made me very happy. I was screaming at my TV trying to pump them up… and was glad somebody got around to it for real.

by danzig on Sep 13, 2008 1:50 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

or sane

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Sep 13, 2008 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that too!

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 13, 2008 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know the strange part for me is that I picked us to lose this game before the season started. Seriously, I did.

Ken Crawford was previewing the season and I was debating him over certain predictions and I threw this one in there because I think I was the only one in the discussion that watched four of Maryland’s game’s last year. Needless to say I got some blank looks (comments).

I saw that ‘bad’ team really turn on when they played ranked teams so I was calling for a let-down game. However, I still can’t believe we lost… i’m stunned.

by danzig on Sep 13, 2008 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW, i was going to do a review of the game but you covered everything so well… there was nothing I had that you already didn’t put on paper, and more… howd you do that so fast dammit?

by danzig on Sep 13, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hydro, per our discussion previous, your judgment call was well played, apparently.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the weather

i was at the game. it was frickin’ hot and humid – anyone that says that wasn’t an issue wasn’t at the game.

by totallyawesome on Sep 13, 2008 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Report from Maryland

I think people who were at the game will back me up, but I think the heat, humidity, and start time had a huge impact on the game.

I’ve been in College Park for the past 48 hours, and it’s been humid but not terribly hot. That changed this morning at about 10 am local time, when the sun came out for the first time. It was incredibly uncomfortable just walking to the stadium at a slow pace and then standing and clapping in the shaded part of the stadium. Combined with the heat, the humidity makes things pretty miserable. The players looked incredibly flat for most of the game, and I think the heat, humidty, the early start time, and the fact that Cal arrived less than 24 hours ago and never had a chance to get aclimated had a significant impact on the game.

At the end of the game, Cal started to pick it up. Maybe it was Maryland playing prevent defense, maybe Riley final shook off the terrible funk he was in for most o the game. But about halfway through the fourth quarter, clouds started shielding the sun and a nice wind started up. That Cal finally picked it up at the same time that the weather changed doesn’t seem like a coincidence to me. If we started this game at 3:30 local time, we may have had a much different game.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Sep 13, 2008 1:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Im not. I demand CBKWit bring back baromatic pressure reports, the whole works!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Cal can't handle adverse weather conditions and travel

they deserve every bit of the intense mocking that is certain to come from the national media this week. Seriously. This is Pac 10 football. If Cal ever truly wants to be a national player they can’t lose games because of time zones and humidity. They should be able to handle things like that. Perhaps there’s something to the coming out on Friday instead of Thursday factor, but I would hope a team filled with the “leaders” I keep reading about would fight through that.

Last I checked, Maryland had to play in the exact same conditions (besides the time zone change).

The Bear Will Not Quit
The Bear Will Not Die

by joshiemac on Sep 13, 2008 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree JMac.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Taking a look at the other scores around the nation, I retract my Pac 10 football statement. Cal’s play today is right in line with the rest of the Pac 10.

Don’t know if I can bring myself to cheer for USC against the sweater vest.

The Bear Will Not Quit
The Bear Will Not Die

by joshiemac on Sep 13, 2008 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

i kept wishing during the game that the announcers would shut up about the time change and weather. the team should be able to handle those kind of issues and be prepared. i hope this kind of loss will wake them up a little bit.

by giantfan5 on Sep 13, 2008 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree… but it definitely is “easier” to be an east coast team. More favorable traveling (gain instead of lose hours) and the weather too. Coming to the west coast is like playing in paradise.

Again, I agree that it SHOULDNT cause a team to lose… but unfortunately I wonder if it is the case.

by Mister Pie on Sep 13, 2008 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree philosophically but practically it had a huge impract. I was at the get and the heat was oppressive. And bs about the other team having to play in it too. They are used to it.

by tmoran3020 on Sep 14, 2008 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right. We shouldnt be losing due to weather and travel conditions. Our team needs to prepare better for situations such as these. But honestly, if you had stood there in that god awful stadium, and endured the heat for 3 hours, you would understand that there is no place in Berkeley that is capable of simulating that environment.

I have the burn to prove it :(

by CaliforniaBone on Sep 15, 2008 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep, me too. Sunscreen, dammit. Sunscreen.

Plus I had a couple idiots in front of me who clearly had no affiliation with the school outside of them living in Baltimore or something. Aggg, no fun.

by tmoran3020 on Sep 15, 2008 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll back up CBKWit on the weather

It certainly had an effect on me and the rest of the crowd, and I was just standing there, not running around in pads and such. I think it’s something you can get used to, but the Cal players did not look comfortable out there. Flat and uninspired is right.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Sep 13, 2008 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

stupid safety call

I just got home from the game. wtf?

I was sitting about 4 rows behind the band, and was lined up with the goal line. From my point of view (which was pretty damn good), the guy was at least a yard inside the endzone. I figured there was some kind of procedural penalty I didn’t know about, or that the play was somehow unreviewable when they didn’t give us 2.

I still need to see a TV replay of it, since the bastards who run the video board didn’t put it on the screen for OBVIOUS REASONS.

by Calx on Sep 13, 2008 2:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Worst call I’ve ever seen. I’m pretty sure the entire Maryland TEAM was stuck in the endzone, much less the ball carrier.

Vote DAN MOGULOF for Mayor of Berkeley

by bears'R'us on Sep 13, 2008 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Sadness, Oh, The Sadness

So, this was my first Cal loss as an emotionally-engaged, semi-football-educated fan. Last year, I felt kinda bad when Cal lost…it was a bummer, but I didn’t really get why they did or what they could have done differently (aside from scoring more points). And I mean (as usual), I’m no football expert, but I was definitely into this game. I knew what was going on (most of the time) and when things didn’t happen the way I wanted them to (even I knew that should have been a safety!!!), I felt it. Maybe it had something to do with the horrible and ungodly hour of 9am game-watching, but I think for once, I am starting to feel the pain of watching your team play poorly. When I first started shouting things like “WHY OH WHY DOES THIS GAME SUCK SO HARD????”, Kittwin and friends said, “Oh RBB, welcome to being a Cal fan.” Le sigh…at least it wasn’t a total blowout.

At least I made a totally awesome football field cake.

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 13, 2008 5:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

When do I get some of that cake????

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Next away game, I’m making another one. This time, possibly it will be 2-layer Blue and Gold.

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 13, 2008 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That still doesnt answer my question.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, Twist. The cake is all gone. If you’re nice, you’ll get some next time.

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 14, 2008 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ni……..ce? What’s that?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you have to ask, you’ll never know.

Sorry, that was mean. Which is the opposite of nice.

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 14, 2008 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will have to learn how to bake my own cakes. So, then I won’t have to be nice to you anymore! Hiyo!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I told you before that the cake is a lie, but did you listen to me? Noooooooo.

It’s times like this I wish they’d never discovered CougCenterium.

by Maharg on Sep 15, 2008 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Touche, salesman.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 15, 2008 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PS

Did anyone else see Jahvid Best throw up?

Poor guy…but at least he got back in the game!

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 13, 2008 5:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I was a bit weirded out when I saw that on TV and the announcers kept blabbering on like nothing happened. That and the color made it very surreal.

Vote DAN MOGULOF for Mayor of Berkeley

by bears'R'us on Sep 13, 2008 5:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

the color was probably due to Gatorade they gave him...

…personally, I’ve never seen vomit that fluorescent in my entire life.

by BearStage on Sep 13, 2008 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was hoping the coaches would keep him out. Concussions are a serious matter, tough football player-mentality aside.

by sec119 on Sep 13, 2008 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sad panda

The defense had to be pretty tired by the fourth quarter after all that effort expended in the first three, with no help from the offense. They did get a couple of turnovers, which were promptly wasted by the offense.

As for a positive for Riley, I didn’t note the leadership so much as I did the learning curve. Obviously in the first three quarters he didn’t play so well. He overthrew some receivers, he took some sacks that he shouldn’t have, etc. By the fourth quarter it seemed like he realized/was coached that he should get rid of the ball sooner, and that will serve us well going forward.

by sec119 on Sep 13, 2008 5:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Time zone issues

I really don’t buy the early start time bothers the players argument. When I was in high school I had early track meets and ran at 8 or 9 am all the time and it was never an issue. If you’re a competitor you get excited for a game regardless, and I’m pretty sure our team is full of competitors.

Now the humidity I can imagine affecting us. But in the end it’s about execution and playmaking – none of which we did.

I only wish it were actually close in the end so I could feel comfortable blaming the refs – but we played so badly I can’t really do that! Damn

by norcalnick on Sep 13, 2008 6:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

but were you traveling cross-country for the track meet?

…and had you been put through a sleep experiment for days before?

Now the commentator said something about Tedford’s decision to fly out Friday having to do with not missing too much class; it didn’t surprise me. Did anyone else hear that? If it’s true, it does point to a major difference between Cal and other major programs, i.e. Tedford’s well-known strong dedication to growing strong students, not just athletes. Pretty much every other major program would probably have had the kids come in on Thursday; you know an Ohio St. or a USC would have, for sure. Of course, we know that they probably aren’t as academically focused as Tedford is. It’s a great thing for our players in the long run, but sadly, Tedford’s commitment to academic excellence didn’t help us today.

This is not to complain about Tedford’s policies; I think it’s a great idea, and refreshing to see that a coach cares about more than just football. It’s just to say that some upsides can have a downside too.

by BearStage on Sep 13, 2008 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

3rd down and Red Zone issues

You all have already noted the obvious: sleepy start, several key blown calls by the officials, and just flat out outplayed on the line of scrimmage almost the whole game long. But for me, this game ultimately boiled down to poor execution on third down and in the red zone—on both sides of the ball. And maybe I’m remembering things wrong, but it seems that 3rd-down (in)efficiency on defense was a big problem last year, too, and same goes for the offense’s struggles in the red zone. Does anyone have the relevant numbers from the last 3-4 years to see if these are indeed trends, and disturbing ones at that? I’m just sick of the inability to consistently punch it into the end zone when not delivered by a big play, and even more sick of all the 3rd-down conversions by the Bears’ opponents—even when it’s Third and relatively long.

Finally, did it seem like the Bears went with a lot of 2 tight-end sets today, limiting the role of the fullback? I’ve been so pleased to see the reemergence of the classic Tedford offense during the first two weeks, with Will T paving the way for big games by the tailbacks. But not today. Why not?

At least we now get to see if Tedford really has fixed the “character” issues last year’s squad had, because ASU comes visiting just a couple weeks down the road.

P.S. Danzig: Am I safe in guessing that next week’s Jahvid Best video will be set to the theme of The Exorcist? That was nasty.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Sep 13, 2008 7:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Here are some notes from JO about the Cal game today. I posted this in the USC-OSU thread but it probably got lost in there.

–Jeff Tedford said after today’s game that the officials did indeed review Da’Rel Scott’s run from the 1-yard line that appeared to be a safety on the replay.

–Tedford also said that Shane Vereen suffered an ankle sprain but it doesn’t appear to be serious.

–Most guys said after the game that they didn’t feel affected by the time change. They actually said, if anything, it was the heat and humidity that was the hardest adjustment. But nobody blamed the loss on it or said it was a major factor.

–More than one player pointed out that this year’s team is better-equipped to handle adversity than last year’s because of the improved leadership on the roster. The Bears seem pretty sure the loss won’t linger.

–Jahvid Best said he felt a little sore after the game, but not much more than that. He also said the hit he took from Maryland’s Kevin Barnes was the hardest he’d ever taken in his life.

by Berkelium97 on Sep 13, 2008 7:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I saw these notes, too

Generally good news, I suppose, about the seeming OK health of the two tailbacks. And so far at least, the players are saying the right things about not going into the tank after this loss.

But how in the world did a review of that run by Scott not result in a Safety call??!! Shocking news (he writes sarcastically): there’s lousy officiating on the East Coast, too.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Sep 13, 2008 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I knew the weather would be a factor. Apparently the team agrees. Oh and all this talk of well, “Maryland had to play in it to…” Well yeah, but that is where they live. Being unable to see the difference in how they might be able to perform better under those conditions is kinda funny. Team should have flown there Thursday.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Transcribed from someone at the game

From BI:

3) Sitting about 5 rows off the field behind CAL’s bench, it was clear that a few of Riley’s errant passes were due to WRs cutting the wrong way or taking the wrong route. Riley was visiably frustrated on at least 2-3 drives – Tedford seemed to agree. His INT was a result of the WR slipping on the field and the DB jumped the route.

4) Tedford had another blow up, this time directed at one of his trainers who was madly trying to retape Vareen’s ankle in the second half. I’m guessing it took way too long and Vareen missed a play he was supposed to be in on.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 8:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

So many on-sides

I was surprised and disappointed at the multiple on-side kicks. Not only do they rarely work but we were not in such desperate circumstances to warrant them. I thought our D played fairly well even towards the end, but it gave the turtles such a short field, we were just asking for that last touchdown. Without those seven points on the boards we would have been right in there at the end. Obviously their D may have stepped up play, but we had them on their heels.

Bonus: Does anyone know the recovery percentage of the on-side kick?

by CountDuku on Sep 13, 2008 9:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Im not sure we had them on their heels when their backup running back (son of Dave Megget, apparently) rumbled for 42 yards en route to their last TD.

I dont know the overall recovery of the on-side, but Seawright wasnt doing them particularily well. Our kicking game wasnt very good, unfortunately. At least Anger looked improved. Hopefully, he is over his injury!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I too was confused by the onside kicks.

One theory that I came up with was that we wanted to have all the time that we could have. Giving Maryland a short field position takes away the ability for them to run the clock. Once the onside kick fails, you’re betting that your defense can stop them before they get points, but there will only be so much time wasted.

I don’t know—maybe not.

It's seriously too bad that there's no building or complex around that might have a large supply of sports drinks.

by thenick on Sep 14, 2008 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some late night action before you proceed with Cal discussion

ASU 20, UNLV 13, 3 min in 4th quarter; UNLV about to get the ball back
Wisconsin 13, Fresno State 7, 3rd quarter

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 9:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

UNLV 1st and goal at the 8

Watching this on an incredibly choppy feed.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 9:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT!!! WHAT A TOUCHDOWN!

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 9:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

UNLV’s Quarterback scrambled around for 10 seconds before finding his receiver who made a ONE HANDED catch in the end zone! Tied at 20 with 19 seconds left!!!

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 9:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Cal played flat

just like when we went to Tenn. 2 years ago. I really do think that the early Eastern time zone start is a HUGE factor.

That Line Judge on Maryland’s side killed us with his spots and the non safety call! That cost us a couple of time outs and time on the clock which we could of used on that last drive before the half. With the extra time we might of scored a TD instead of missing that FG. Those two things are 9 points and we lost by 8!

I still feel that we where out played also but I feel that the early start was the biggest problem.

GO BEARS!!!!!!!

by calas on Sep 13, 2008 10:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OH MY GOD

No good. UNLV WINS.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 10:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The race for #2 (and potentially the Rose Bowl) is WIDE OPEN THIS YEAR!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All we have to get is the second spot in the Pac10. The Rose Bowl thing, we can figure that out later. But I’m just saying for all the gnashing of teeth today, nobody else besides USC looked good. Its a down year for the Pac10.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 13, 2008 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh yeah, you’re right. the pac-10 got thrashed this weekend in out-of-conference play. ucla, cal, arizona (losing to NEW MEXICO?!), arizona state, stanfurd, wsu, washington all took their lumps.

by the federer express on Sep 13, 2008 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really have no idea who will take #2 this year

Cal and ASU have their notable flaws. Oregon’s QB is out for up to a month and his knee may not be ready for his run-heavy play when he does return. Arizona doesn’t have the talent to win enough games. UCLA is pretty much awful. And WSU or UW may not get a win until they play each other. It looks like this year will be (unlike last year) a struggle for who can lose the fewest games as opposed to a tough competition for who can win the most.

by Berkelium97 on Sep 13, 2008 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I forgot OSU and Stanford

but I think they will be doomed to mediocrity this season.

by Berkelium97 on Sep 13, 2008 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No kidding

Fairly pleasant day I must say.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The UCLA game was the salve to heal my wounded heart yesterday.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fresno St v Wisconsin.

You guys really need to check out this game. Very exciting low scoring affair. Can’t believe ASU lost and Oregon almost lost. What a weekend.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 10:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If Fresno loses this game, I’m breaking the bottle back out. Just too much to stomach in one day.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 10:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That Fresno field goal kicker is terrible.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 10:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great

Well, great. Now everyone is going to think Wisconsin is for real, and with a weak Big Ten there is no telling how far they could go. I have to say, the only good thing today was seeing SC smash tOSU. And that sad. Anyone else feel kinda bummed out? No need to answer that…

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 10:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i feel like crying

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 13, 2008 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me too… Nah, J/K. It’s almost like I am numb to these defeats now. Nothing can crush my spirit, because I have none………….

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, man...

Come on man, really, stop trying to act like Twist. Everything will work out. It never does, and never has before, but it will this year. I was suspect of ASU all year. I knew they would get smashed. I’m telling you, all we need to do is not lose to anyone else, minus USC. If USC runs the tables, and we only lose to USC, = Rose Bowl baby!

See, so really… Everyone cheer up.

I’m sort of schizophrenic I think. I go from being totally bummed, to thinking everything is great. I need some meds man! (-:

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When did nearly committing suicide equate to acting like me?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant with the dramatics. That is all. No one could ever hope to be as dramatic as you Twisty.

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn you CaliSeth, that’s just mean.

It’s times like this I wish they’d never discovered CougCenterium.

by Maharg on Sep 15, 2008 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa!

I just stumbled into the Bear Insider for the first time in about a year. Man. And you guys think I am crazy and extreme? Those guys are really out there. Their simple solution to everything seems to be to blame, fire, blame, fire, and blame some more… Be it on the coaches, the players, hell, even Oski! Wow. I’ve never, EVER, liked the term fruitcake. Hell, I’ve never even used it, but I believe it applies aptly to them.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 11:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Though I must admit, some of their stuff is genuinely funny.

by CaliSeth on Sep 13, 2008 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What?

They can’t be that bad. What threads are you reading?

by BearsNecessity on Sep 13, 2008 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I guess their not that bad. I think maybe I overreacted. A lot of what they say has some merit. A year ago I would have probably joined in with them in calling for certain coaches to be fired. I just don’t have that in me anymore. Not yet anyway. I will give Cignetti, Gregory and Alamar a chance to redeem themselves before I call for their heads. Some of the Bear Insider folks don’t like that idea. It may have only been a couple of people, I guess. That site is so haphazardly set up I can’t really get a feel for the place.

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

re: whoa

You’re right. You’re not as crazy and extreme as some people over there.

Those guys are really out there. Their simple solution to everything seems to be to blame, fire, blame, fire, and blame some more… Be it on the coaches, the players, hell, even Oski! Wow.

I agree, but not everyone over there is like that. There certainly is some of that over there. It sort of makes me go crazy that’s why I try not to read it. There are a lot of very passionate fans over there but I do agree that sometimes they are a bit too quick on the fire so and so or blame so and so stuff.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 14, 2008 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What do you mean DON’T blame Oski for this loss?? Did you see how he was drinking through his eye today? That’s SO creepy.

BTW, the dude in Oski today must have nearly dehydrated with the humidity and everything.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah really. It must have been about 120 degrees in that thing. The loss probably only exacerbated Oski’s discomfort. Poor Oski…

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on Baylor’s (!) thrashing of WSU, I think we can officially conclude that our “big” win last week didn’t mean too much.

Hard to be optimistic today. This still looks like a team with leadership issues, particularly on D and a penchant for mysteriously mailing it in from time to time. Uninspired coaching, uninspired play, we got dominated at the LOS.

I still think we will improve as the year progresses, and at least we got rid of the treeshitters!

Let’s not read too much into this one, but today I’m bitter!!

by OskiMonsta on Sep 14, 2008 3:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Somebody’s Bitter!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is there an echo in here??

by OskiMonsta on Sep 15, 2008 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think it was the weather

we dominated both lines of scrimmage in our first two games. This game, our O line didn’t have enough power to open up holes and our D Line and Linebackers weren’t quick enough to stop their run. I don’t think these guys suddenly suck, but I know I felt miserable just sitting there and I was in the shade.

This may seem like a lame excuse, but those guys on the eastern seaboard are used to it. California players aren’t used to playing in a swamp.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Sep 14, 2008 8:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, if that is truly as big an excuse as you and others have claimed, then I am happy this was a OOC game.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If heat/humidity was a determining factor, why did we get dominated in the 1Q? I might buy into that if it looked like we wore down, but if anything it actually looked like we got better as the game went on.

Excuses are like assholes and you know the rest of that one. We just got beat.

by OskiMonsta on Sep 15, 2008 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, the weather got noticably better in the fourth quarter when cloud cover shielded the stadium from teh sun. If you weren’t there, you wouldnt have noticed that, or the overpowering weather condition.

Plus, to add on to the whole 3000 mile away game theory, we got dominated in the first quarter partly because the players were tired and unfocused. The O-line was noticably bad and it showed in their missed blocks.

by CaliforniaBone on Sep 15, 2008 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No question about the weather

CBK I can back you up on that. Most people don’t know what it’s like to walk into that kind of heat and humidity, especially when you’re not at all acclimated to it. This is a side topic, but I have a theory that says SEC non-conference ‘dominance’ comes in part from playing so many home games in early August/late September when the humidity in the South is still very noticeable.

Separate question – did anyone else have an early issue with the play calling? We didn’t seem to run the ball at all in the early going when the score was still reasonable, and then later it was too late. It’s good to see Kevin Riley step up and gain some confidence in the passing game, but I think that it came at the expense of developing our running game in the early game.

by Nashville on Sep 14, 2008 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ive spent a decent chunk of time in humidity in South Carolina and elsewhere. I know the effect humidity can have. My point is not that the humidity didn’t effect anybody. Clearly, it did.

My concern is less than it did and more that, yknow, it did. Does that make sense? The team failed to put itself into a position to minimize the effect of the humidity as much as possible. And, thus, it was a factor.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Humidity, preparation, etc.

Twist,

Good points.

I haven’t been able to find out what College Park’s typical September weather is like, but D.C. is only only 10 miles away and it has an average Sept. temperature of 79 degrees according to Wikipedia. So, 90 degrees sounds unusually high, and based on nothing more than personal experience in humid climates – my mother is from Alabama and as you might have guessed, I live in Nashville – 80% humidity sounds above average too.

I say all of this in order to wonder aloud whether or not heat and humidity were something the Bears even knew to prepare for? I imagine you’ve read more pre-game commentary than I, but it seems that everyone was focusing on accounting for the the early start time. Was there any talk/concern about what the weather might be like? If so, I didn’t read it.

So, it was a factor in part because the team had no idea it’d be a factor.

by Nashville on Sep 14, 2008 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, it was a factor in part because the team had no idea it’d be a factor.

It is the players jobs to execute. It is the coaching staff’s job to put the players in as best a position to execute. So, if there is something that exists that is actively hindering the execution of the team and nobody had ANY idea it’d be a factor, then that falls on the head of the coaching staff.

I’m not sure that is the case. I dunno. I know Tedford had the players waking up early to try to work on the time change. Has anybody heard whether they did anything to prepare for the humidity? Is it really just lack of preparation on the coaching staffs part?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has anybody heard whether they did anything to prepare for the humidity?

I can only imagine…

by RemorsefulBruinBabe on Sep 14, 2008 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, if there is something that exists that is actively hindering the execution of the team and nobody had ANY idea it’d be a factor, then that falls on the head of the coaching staff.

Agreed. I used ‘the team’ as a general reference when to be specific I meant the coaching staff. Without excusing them for not preparing, assuming that they did not, College Park’s latitude is 2 degrees higher than Berkeley’s (39 N as opposed to 37 N), so it is reasonable to assume that weather concerns weren’t at the top of Tedford’s list.

Again, I’m not claiming any special knowledge of why the Bears had a tough time with the weather, merely throwing up a couple of reasons for how it is the humidity could have had such an effect.

by Nashville on Sep 14, 2008 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not unusual for this time of year

Early to mid September can vary from pleasant to brutal in the DC area – so this weekend’s weather wasn’t too far out of the ordinary, but even for locals it was pretty tough going. It was pretty similar to game-time conditions in Charlottesville at the USC – UVA game and I know that some SC players were having issues with cramps and so forth during the game. All of which to say that it wouldn’t be a surprise if the weather slowed down the Cal players.

by DC Trojan on Sep 14, 2008 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We can only hope Maryland crushes Virginia. Otherwise this loss only gets worse.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 15, 2008 4:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, at least Rodgers is doing well today.

I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.

by yellow fever on Sep 14, 2008 11:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Rodgers looks solid. Not that I can watch the game, but all of the reports indicate such. Why all the crickets in here today? Everyone still pretty bummed I guess. Cheer up, it could always be worse…

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, oh no!

Oh my God, somehow the games is 24 to 18 now. WTF happened since halftime. This can’t be happening. The Lions can’t win!

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OH MY GOD.

The Lions just scored………… They’re now winning 25 – 24. This is unbelievable.

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 12:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OK, close one. GB scores. GB back up 34 – 25.

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK so that games over. GB scored again.

by CaliSeth on Sep 14, 2008 1:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A few more thoughts...

After hearing first-hand accounts from Ragnarok, CBKWit, and other readers of our blog that went to the game and said the weather was a factor, I am inclined to change my opinion regarding whether weather really did have a factor. Earlier, I said I didn’t really believe the weather affected us that much but I now I do open myself up to the idea that it did. But if that’s so, it’s peculiar how the team picked up its play in the 4th quarter. If the weather affected the team negatively, you would think it would have a detrimental effect all game long with an increasing effect as the game wore on. Thus, it would seem as if a team would get progressively worse and more affected by the weather as the game went on (tiredness, cramping, etc.), when clearly our team got better as the game went on. So was the team only “shocked” by the weather for the first three quarters?

Finally, the worst that has happened to Cal this year so far is not losing to Maryland but Maryland losing to Middle Tennessee State. Had UM not lost to MTST, we wouldn’t be getting reamed as badly by the MSM (main stream media). Instead of saying “Cal laid an egg against a horrible Maryland team that lost to MTST last week” they would be saying “Cal lost a tough conference road game against a decent Maryland team,” right? Afterall, Maryland does actually have some very decent talent on their team. Their problem was never talent, but perhaps just getting up for games.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 14, 2008 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It might be that the Maryland team isn’t conditined as well as our team, or some other related problem. Like maybe their physical states went from 100% → 50% over the day while our players’ went from 80% → 60%.

by rurata on Sep 14, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

very good point.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 14, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, towards the end of the game, clouds obscured the sun and it was NOTICEABLY cooler. Fans perked up, and it seemed like the players did too, though I’m sure there were other factors involved.

It was HORRIBLE coming from the Bay Area and going to the 95% humidity of Washington DC / College Park. There were several occasions where moisture actually condensed out of the air.

It's seriously too bad that there's no building or complex around that might have a large supply of sports drinks.

by thenick on Sep 14, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was the point I was making

We started playing well in the 4th quarter, when the clouds came in and the wind picked up. And I would disagree with the point that you get worse as the game goes on. The second you step out of the air conditioned locker room (or in my case, the hotel), you feel awful.

Time will tell if it really was the humidity or if our oline/defensive front 7 really are that bad. I’m going to reserve judgement until after the ASU game (which looks VERY winnable right now). But as someone who experienced the weather first hand, I think it had a huge impact on the game.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Sep 15, 2008 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I made the same point about weather above before seeing this. Totally agree with your analysis.

by OskiMonsta on Sep 15, 2008 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what about cignetti?

I was a little perturbed with our play calling…..

one drive in particular got snuffed out after we got to the MD 40, then 20 yard passes were called on first and second down, fell incomplete, then we had a 3rd and 10…. play call: screen pass for 4 yards. Cignetti is great, but he got beat bad by MDs D coordinator

It seemed like once we realized our run game was in trouble and we were down 14-0, our offense panicked and was looking for the homerun play. We were throwing screens, play actions, deep posts, etc…. it was like we were trying to force it. The fourth quarter went so well because we started throwing 5-7 yard hooks and slants and the YAC took care of itself. You got young receivers yeah? so have them run simple routes. They are talented guys, and I saw a couple great catches from Calvin and Boateng. Until the fourth quarter, we had short passes, and long passes, but the midrange was totally missing.

My heart skips a beat every time I hear the band strike up 'Our Sturdy Golden Bear'.

by oskisunbear on Sep 14, 2008 6:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Whats odd to me is all the criticisms here are so conflicting. Not to say, oskisunbear, that yours are incorrect. Merely just that you say we were throwing too deep too much. Others saying that we were not throwing deep in the early going. Just kind of funny to me.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we threw medium enough.

by sec119 on Sep 14, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, guys, heres my criticism. Why arent we throwing more backwards passes? Whats up with that????

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had other problems with the playcalling - where was the play where Riley throws it 40 yards deep to himself?

by sec119 on Sep 14, 2008 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not as many solely vertical passes, too. Let’s just throw it straight up in the air.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Throwing is so predictable. We need more plays with volleyball serves.

by sec119 on Sep 14, 2008 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel as if there has been an insufficient amount of volleying in recent games. That Cignetti has GOT to go!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re crazy. It’s all Alamar’s fault. Fire him. He’s responsible for all of Cal’s problems – and I mean everything. He’s responsible for tree-sitters, Tom Holmoe, earthquakes, EVERYTHING.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 14, 2008 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alamar is responsible for humidity?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 15, 2008 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, his hot air is more of a dry heat.

by turkey on Sep 15, 2008 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we can solve things by calling more plays that work. We called a lot of plays that didn’t work and that didn’t get us very many points. I think that calling more plays that work would be a more effective way to score more points.

by OskiMonsta on Sep 15, 2008 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting, but ultimately controversial thesis!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 15, 2008 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

then 20 yard passes were called on first and second down

Careful there. Pass plays aren’t necessarily queued up as “20 yard passes.” There are often multiple routes to the play which can vary in depth down the field. Perhaps on those plays Riley just felt that the deeper routes were the open routes instead of throwing the shorter routes. So I mean, it might seem as if Cignetti took shots down the field on first and second down, but perhaps that was really in fact Riley.

As for things getting better in the 4th quarter, I think that was a mixture of the offense getting into a rhythm and Maryland dropping back into prevent defenses to take away the deep routes but allowing those “5-7 yard hooks and slants.”

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Sep 14, 2008 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it apparently it got cooler.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 14, 2008 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has anyone seen Varsity Blues?

And there’s that scene where the football team goes out drinking and to a strip club the night before a big game, then they’re too tired to play the next day?

Yeah, that’s probably what happened here.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen Cal look this slow. I immediately had to go drink afterwards.

by Rishi on Sep 14, 2008 8:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But where is the statue to Tedford, and who plays the StripperTeacher? If that’s what happened, then where are the rest of the parallels?

It’s times like this I wish they’d never discovered CougCenterium.

by Maharg on Sep 15, 2008 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is Longshore going to call a hook and ladder play from the sidelines to win the conference championship?

by turkey on Sep 15, 2008 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

slow and weak

not to beat a dead horse, but: HUMIDITY.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Sep 15, 2008 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

Clearly, it was strippers and drinking the night before.

by Rishi on Sep 16, 2008 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t want your life.

It’s times like this I wish they’d never discovered CougCenterium.

by Maharg on Sep 17, 2008 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lies

Everyone does.

by Rishi on Sep 17, 2008 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I raised you to be a winner, so dammit boy, win!

It’s times like this I wish they’d never discovered CougCenterium.

by Maharg on Sep 18, 2008 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Many of the fans there were complete douche bags.

Many of them. There were some nice people here and there, but the drunk smack talking douche bag was more prominent than most places I’ve been. Why is the east coast so dumb and angry all the time? Is it the weather?

by zoonews on Sep 15, 2008 12:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't their prize

Free windshield wiper fluid? Good stuff.

by BearsNecessity on Sep 15, 2008 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Multiple times they announced the free wiper fluid for scoring more than x points.

by zoonews on Sep 16, 2008 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ
Start posting about the Golden Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Tedford's Early Recruiting Classes- An Objective Re-Evaluation
Cgb1_small
DBD 2.4.10 BAM Competition
Jones_1_squared_small
The 2010 National Signing Day Preview
Calflag_small
California Golden Recruits Thread: Signing Day Week
Trebek_small
Cal Rugby: Whose Scrum Axe?

Recent FanPosts

Chowder2_small
DBD 2.09.10 Cal Football Crossword Puzzle
Small
Fujita's suggestion pays off
Att0002323_small
DBD 2.8.10 Better know a Bear
Football_small
Free Audio Stream of Super Bowl?
Trebek_small
DBD 2.5.10
Tbc_small
Wunderkind QB to Become the Next Prince of $C
Concord_aerial_1930_small
Depth Charts on Defense - looking ahead
Sp_biggame_0818_kr_small
Whiteside Featured in Today's OC Register

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Jahvidtician

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Calflag_small Avinash

Member Of The Follettariat

Bear__small norcalnick

Official Partner of CBS Sports