Shocker: Justin Kicks F***n Ass, Again

I guess it's coming as a bit of a surprise to Seattle fans that Justin totally kicks ass. SHOCKER!
In his last game vs the Bears, Justin rushed for 136 yards on 15 carries averaging 9.1 yards per carry. Oh yeah, he also had 125 yards in the return game. He finished with 261 total yards, which is 55 more than the entire Bears offense. No bullshit. By the 4th quarter the crowd was so impressed they gave him an ovation every time he left the field... and they boo-ed the guy that came in to take a snap so that Justin could rest.
In the end it's no shocker to us because breaking tackles and gashing the defense for 136 yards per game is just what he does.
Who got the game ball? Take a wild guess.
Game video below:

Justin Forsett vs Bears Preseason
Justin Forsett vs Vikings Preseason
From the News Tribune:
It’s a No-Brainer: Seahawks should Keep Forsett
First off, Justin Forsett has to make this football team. NFL observers preach that you can’t make too much out of performances in preseason games.
I don’t care, the rookie running back/returner once again was the most exciting Seahawks player on the field Saturday night.
This wasn’t just a nice effort against a bunch of backups. This was memorable.
Yes, they have some numbers issues at running back, but if nothing else, this rookie has proven himself a potential game-changer as a return man. And as a change-of-pace back from scrimmage? How’s 15 carries for 136 yards? He finished with 261 total yards – 55 more than the Bears gained the entire game.
Don’t let his size fool you. This guy runs tough; he’s strong, he’ll block … and, man, he’s fun to watch.
Make the numbers work; keep this guy. And give raises to the personnel folks who had the sense to pick him up in the seventh round.

Justin lost a shoe, but found a touchdown.
From the Washington Olympian:
Frye Struggles, but Forsett Makes Pitch to Stick Around
If Holmgren decides not to make Justin Forsett a part of his 53-man roster, he may be viewed as downright kooky.
As poorly as Frye played in the Seahawks’ 29-26 overtime exhibition victory over the Chicago Bears on Saturday night at Qwest Field, that is how well Forsett, a seventh-round draft choice from California, performed in a role as both running back and return man.
Forsett had 53 of his game-high 136 rushing yards on the final drive of the game, which ended with rookie Brandon Coutu’s 36-yard field goal, his fifth of the game.
With Chicago’s Devin Hester, the game’s premier returner, looking on, Forsett pieced together another 117 yards returning punts and kickoffs, including a 40-yard punt return. He also had a 43-yard punt return called back because of a holding penalty on fellow rookie John Carlson.
“The little guy can play, I’ve said that from the very beginning,” Holmgren said.
Forsett is in an interesting position because he is a running back on a team that seemingly already has its full contingent, with Julius Jones, Maurice Morris, Owen Schmitt, Leonard Weaver and T.J. Duckett.
But coaches usually say that if a player makes enough plays they will find a spot for him.
There is some thought that Forsett may be a better choice than Duckett, who has not shown a great deal either in training camp or either of two preseason games. Duckett had two fumbles last week and dropped what would have been a touchdown reception on Saturday, though he did score the game-tying touchdown from 1 yard out after his first attempt failed.
But Duckett was given $4 million in guaranteed money in free agency and cutting him now would be admitting a huge mistake.
The numbers make it even more difficult for Forsett because serious injuries to Bobby Engram and Deion Branch mean there are one and possibly two dead spots on a roster where Holmgren usually likes to keep 25 offensive players. Holmgren was noncommittal when asked after the game about Forsett’s chances.
“That will be a tough decision at the end,” Holmgren said. “I like the player and his teammates like him and he produces, but it is a couple of games and we have a ways to go here.”
Still, if Forsett continues to make plays like the numerous ones he made against Chicago, it would seem very difficult for Seattle to keep him off the team. He led the team in rushing with a 9.1-yard average on 15 carries in the second half, plus added a reception. On one kickoff return when Michael Bumpus caught the ball, Forsett even took on 260-pound Adewale Ogunleye.
“It was great out there,” Forsett said. “I was getting kind of fatigued but I knew everyone was counting on me. You never know when it is going to be your last time to get that ball, so you have to make the most of that opportunity.”
MY TAKE REGARDING SEATTLE RB GLUT: Trade Forsett... yes, trade him. Seattle has so many incumbent running backs with guaranteed money that Justin will never get a chance to show his true potential. After these two games, Justin will have no problem finding a home and the Bills have been drooling over him since the draft. In fact, the Bills' RB depth falls flat after their #2 Freddie Jackson... they're dying to cut Dwane Wright and Justin has epic chemistry with Marshawn. Make a deal with the Bills!
Regardless, Justin is now a hot commodity and will get playing time if traded... if they keep him, they'll just use him in the prison that is the Seattle special teams. Hell, even releasing him would be a decent option for Justin. Simply burying Justin #3-#4 on the depth chart is like keeping caged birds... it's just fucked up.

Former Beaver Joey LaRocque says, " WTF?? Not this guy again!"
The game's open thread during the game was even more interesting:
----
Forsett: What a steal.
----
Could our corps of Morris, Jones, Duckett, Weaver, and Forsett to go with Schmidt and Kirtman be any deeper? Time for Holmgren to add some of Mora’s 3 HB formations to the playbook.
----
Boy, Forsett sure took the practice squad option away from Ruskell. He wouldn’t clear waivers now. (I have a colleague, a huge Tennessee fan, who I thought was ready to have Forsett’s lovechild after last year’s game.
----
GO FORSETT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----
John, forgive me...I am now officially mancrushed on Forsett
----
Forsett the Kia Hester
----
take it to the HOUSE FORSETT!
----
FORSETT IS MONEY
----
did you see that sick spin move? hellooooo
word he's slippery as hell
----
i love forsett man
----
OMG GET KENT AND FORSETT ON THIS SQUAD ASAP
----
AHHHH IMD RUINk FUCKING LOVE FORSETT
----
Forsett
Starter
----
Forsett is too awesome
----
Forsett for starter seriously
----
Is Adams or CJ Wallace the odd man out with Forsett sticking?
----
I LOVE FORSETT
----
are you guys watching forsett’s cal highlight reel or a Seahawks pre-season game, I can’t tell from here.
----
he's fucking rediculous
----
love it... f'ing loving it!
----
Forsett is the new Barry Sanders
----
so if Forsett is this good behind the back-up O-line...I’d love to see him run behind Walt and Wahle
----
Forsett is a beast.
----
if anything Forsett will take carries away from Jones and Morris. I actually think Forsett’s success makes them more likely to try and trade Morris.
... Amen
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are not necessarily those of the California Golden Blogs or any of its authors. However, they are just as important as the opinions of any of the authors. And triply so as compared to TwistNHook!
4 recs |
55
comments
Comments
Believe it!!
Awesome highlight reel once again.
You can’t help but love the guy, and it really has nothing to do with his size. The man just plain delivers: he delivers yardage and he delivers serious blows to every defender who gets in his way.
Flying shoes and mouthpieces, spin moves, stiff arms (hey #4, who’s your daddy!!??), what more do you want? The secret is out: Tex is legit NFL material. He will stick somewhere.
by OskiMonsta on Aug 18, 2008 8:24 AM PDT 0 recs
That 2006 team was stacked with DeSean and Marshawn and Forsett.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 8:36 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You saw the LB’s flying mouthpiece?? Good eye… ! If god really existed, he would grant my wish and have him traded to the Bills. BeastMode and TheTruth together again rushing in the pros… how sick would that be?
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 8:36 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Don't like the Bills...
…but if they got the All-Cal backfield going, I might have to become a fan!
by OskiMonsta on
Aug 18, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
They may as well sign Joe Echemendu to join them too.
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Where’s Igber?
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
up
0 recs
2006 may have been the most talented Cal team, offensively, ever.
by Rishi on Aug 18, 2008 8:43 AM PDT 0 recs
Which makes the lack of Rose Bowl berth frustrating.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Blame it on Arizona
That was a painful game. I curse Cason to this day.
by OskiMonsta on
Aug 18, 2008 9:01 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Don’t blame me, I voted for Ayoob.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
up
0 recs
If only we opened the season with a cupcake instead of Tennessee.
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 9:26 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Two-loss Pac-10 co-champs would probably get a BCS bid.
Oh wait, that didn’t work too well for ASU last year. Never mind.
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
up
0 recs
BCS rules have changed since then; come on, you knew that.
They added an additional BCS game.
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
up
0 recs
The point is...
2nd place Pac-10 teams have a fine track record of getting royall screwed by the BCS (see also Oregon 2005). You want to go to the RB, better win the conference outright, preferably with no more than one loss.
by OskiMonsta on
Aug 19, 2008 4:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, you're right...
Pac-10 teams get seriously screwed by the BCS.
And the bowl system in general – I swear, the fifth place SEC team plays on New Years, but the second-place Pac-10 team plays in the Holiday Bowl. What the hell?
by Rishi on
Aug 19, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
This is the WORST thing about the Pac 10
It’s insulting, really. You’re right: the 2nd best time in our conference plays the 5th or 6th best team in a mediocre Big 12. What does that say about the Pac 10?
Look, I like the Holiday Bowl as much as anyone (despite the drubbing I witnessed there against Texas Tech in 04). But if we’re going to keep our connection to it, it should be moved to New Years Day and we should play some other major conference’s number 2, not some also ran from the middle of the pack.
by Crosbino on
Aug 19, 2008 7:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The argument against that is that the Holiday Bowl gets prime time coverage where a New Year’s Bowl game wouldn’t. A New Year’s Bowl game would probably have to start at some insanely early time for West Coasters. A New Year’s Bowl game seems like a giant plum, but there’s more than meets the eye.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 8:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
really, if i were in charge of the Pac-10, i’d go after the Cotton Bowl for the runner-up slot. failing that, i’d at least try and get our runner-up a slot vs. some other conference’s 2nd-place team, even the Big East’s.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on
Aug 19, 2008 8:58 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Sorry, that argument is crap
The Holiday Bowl, in its current timeslot, is bullshit. I’m sorry, but in this day and age, any bowlgame that happens before new years, is irrelevant. A major conference’s #2 should not be relegated to that timeslot.
More than that, though, is the issue of respect nationally. Teams of lesser stature than Cal play on New Years Day. I’m willing to be that far more people watch those games. Even if it were the Gator Bowl at 9 am pacific against Michigan, it would be far better exposure for Cal than the Holiday Bowl.
by Crosbino on
Aug 19, 2008 9:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
To me, it is not as much about the name of the bowl, but more the opponent. When the Pac10 #2 is consistently facing off against #3 or even #4 teams from the Big12 it lowers the level of prestige. That’s really the problem to me.
If it was Cal versus Oklahoma on December 27, 2008, I definitely think people would watch.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 10:04 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Hmm...
Theoretically you could argue that the #2 Pac-10 team is around the #3 Big Twelve team, given the greater number of teams and the fact that, usually, the Big-XII north is mediocre.
Regardless, the fact that the SEC gets four New Years’ games+ (Outback, Capital One, Cotton and Sugar); Big XII gets Gator, Cotton, and Fiesta; Big Ten gets Capital One, Outback, and Rose; even the Big East gets Gator (sometimes) and Orange and the ACC gets Gator (always) and Orange. The Pac-10 is stuck with the Rose and nothing more.
I really think the Holiday Bowl needs a better spot.
by Rishi on
Aug 20, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
up
0 recs
This is the key point
How can the Pac 10 be considered a top flight conference if we only have one bowl (and it’s a bowl that Pac 10 teams don’t play in every year) on New Years Day? Considering SC’s dominance of late, it’s been pretty much them on New Years and nobody else. When’s the last time a team other than SC played on Jan. 1 or later?
Other conferences have multiple slots on Jan. 1 and we sometimes have 1. That’s insulting and it goes a long way toward explaining why the rest of the country thinks the Pac 10 is a joke.
by Crosbino on
Aug 20, 2008 5:20 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I can't believe it... Justin is still a maybe with Homegrown?
Forsett impressive, but will he make the team?
Rookie Justin Forsett is slicing up defenses as a returner and running back, but odds are still against him making the team
“Look at that,” Jones said to no one in particular. “We’ve got a new media star.”
A few lockers away, several reporters had gathered around Justin Forsett. The Seahawks’ soft-spoken rookie sat at his locker and answered questions with the modesty of a man fighting desperately just to make the final cut.
For one night, anyway, Forsett looked like a star-in-waiting. The diminutive running back piled up all 136 of his rushing yards after halftime of a 29-26 preseason win over the Chicago Bears. In the process, he won over a lot of fans in and surrounding Seattle.
And, as Jones noted, a few reporters as well.
“It used to be (rookie fullback Owen) Schmitt. Now it’s definitely Forsett,” Jones told a group of reporters that eventually gathered around his locker. “Definitely deserving, though. He’s fun to watch.”
Listed at 5-foot-8, but realistically a couple inches shorter, Forsett has spent most of his life standing on tiptoes to get noticed. After the way he played Saturday night, his toes may well have looked like those of a ballerina.
“I don’t want to say he single-handedly won the game,” veteran linebacker Lofa Tatupu said, “but it was pretty impressive.”
The question was posed to coach Mike Holmgren about whether Forsett has a chance to make the final 53-man roster. Holmgren answered as honestly as he can after just two preseason games.
“That will be a tough call at the end,” Holmgren said. "He will be involved in that decision at the end, absolutely.
“Right now, if I said anything about the roster, it would be premature. I like (Forsett), and his teammates like him, and he produces. But it was a couple of games, and we have a ways to go here.”
The Seahawks are almost certain to keep veterans Jones, Maurice Morris and Leonard Weaver on the roster. Schmitt is the most likely candidate to serve as Weaver’s backup, while 254-pound veteran T.J. Duckett has a chance to stick as a short-yardage specialist.
The Seahawks typically keep a total of nine players at the running back and wide receiver positions, and the rash of injuries at receiver may well limit the number of runners needed. Only four, possibly five, roster spots are available, meaning Forsett would have to make quite an impression to land one.
“Every day, I’ve got to go out and show that I can play,” Forsett said after combining for 261 total yards and a touchdown. "With my size, people are always going to say that I’m not strong enough, that I’m not fast enough, I’m not durable enough.
“So I’ve got to go out there and keep getting better and better. One mistake, and all of a sudden I’m not durable. So I’ve just got to go out there and play.”
On the field, Forsett has done everything imaginable in terms of production. He has been the Seahawks’ best return man this preseason — Nate Burleson is likely to relinquish those duties, and Forsett and Ben Obomanu are the leading candidates to take over — and ranks second in the NFL with 194 rushing yards through two games. (Washington’s Marcus Mason has a league-high 233 rushing yards but has played in one more game.)
Forsett lasted until the seventh round of the April draft for one obvious reason: size — or lack thereof. He is much stronger than he appears, and Forsett uses his lack of height to his advantage.
“He’s got great leverage,” Tatupu said. “He’s tough to take down because he can react to any contact. He uses his size to his advantage.”
Even before the rookie became a Seahawk, Tatupu knew all about him. He had heard about the little guy who broke a Cal record by carrying the ball 305 times in his only season as a starter there, and finished his career as the school’s third-leading rusher, with 3,220 career yards.
“I’m sure a lot of Husky fans already knew he was,” Tatupu said. “But he was real impressive (Saturday night). It was just good to see a young guy have a game like that. I’m really happy for him.”
So is Jones, who wouldn’t mind seeing Forsett join him on the Seahawks’ final roster.
“We need a guy like that on our team,” Jones said. “He’s very exciting. I had fun watching him.”
by danzig on Aug 18, 2008 9:05 AM PDT 0 recs
exactly!
With a coach as appreciative as Homgrown, I’m almost hoping Justin gets released or traded so he can actually reach his potential.
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Or so I hear. Not that I’d know anything about it.
by OskiMonsta on
Aug 18, 2008 10:15 AM PDT
up
0 recs
It’s the truth.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 2:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Great videos, Danzig. I appreciate the NFL coverage since I can’t see all these games.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Aug 18, 2008 9:57 AM PDT 0 recs
If you can you should try to catch a reply of this game tho… what you don’t get in the video is how Justin took over the crowd…. how they cheered him every time he took a break and then boo-ed Duckett when he would come on the field… it was wild.
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Why is that not in the video?
Awesome video, just asking…
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
up
0 recs
It’s actually a good question… I try to maintain a level of quality so Justin’s video is about 380mb and over eight mins long. Uncut it exceeded 12mins and would be approx 500mb. I get to upload 500mb to the video site per week (godamn you bandwidth limitations!!)… the math doesn’t work… I have to cut out as much as possible.
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Youtube embed quality is the worst in the biz… they have 1gig upload limit, but when you embed any of your videos to a blog… the quality is so awful that you can’t recognize your video anymore… that’s why I refuse to embed any Youtube videos… as you might have noticed.
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 12:19 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks for doing that. I’m really impressed at the high quality of these vids.
by sec119 on
Aug 18, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Ah, okay. Never knew that.
Thanks for making videos btw. They’re amazing.
by Rishi on
Aug 18, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
BTW, can we get a ‘making of’ video sometime? I feel like we’re also missing a ‘behind the highlights’ video of Danzig’s rampant womanizing, drug problem and alcohol abuse tearing apart the group.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
you say it like those are bad things…. I call it truly ‘living.’
by danzig on
Aug 18, 2008 5:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I call it good television.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 19, 2008 7:27 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeh...I think Forsett has made mancrush status
I’ve had mad respect for Forsett for a while. Just as an individual and as a teammate. The ideal kind of guy any coach would want for their program: humble, genuine, hardworking, coachable, patient, academic, and productive.
But geez, I’m loving how he’s running right now. Those cuts, those spins, those tackle shakes, carrying defenders into the endzone…I’m loving it.
Props on the videos Dan.
www.bearswithfangs.com
by bearswithfangs on Aug 18, 2008 1:39 PM PDT 0 recs
I’m having problems with the character development. And I’m not sure I fully understand the pathos of the Bears character. Do they want to tackle Forsett, because that’s just what they get paid to do? Or is it because of some Greecian flaw from their own insecurities?
Truly, are they tackling Forsett or are they just tackling their emotional growth?
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 2:20 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Verily, can’t it be both?
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
By the very nature of their emotional insecurities, they wouldn’t be tackling merely for the sake of the tackle. The existence of one negates the existence of the other.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The existence of you negates you.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You really know how to sweet-talk a lady, don’t you?
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 18, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Lady? What’s that?
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
by Maharg on
Aug 18, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Here’s one:

"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Tu eres es usted, as they say.
Actually that’s just what we said, a lot, in 10th grade spanish to annoy the hell out of our teacher.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Aug 18, 2008 3:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You know I don’t speak Spanish, Baxter!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I love scotch. Scotchy, scotch, scotch. Here it goes down, down into my belly…
by danzig on
Aug 19, 2008 10:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs













