If Cal could bring one player back...
Yeah, so I shamelessly stole this from Scout.com. Except their post is all about the SEC (best league ever amirite guyz?!), so I thought it'd be interesting to apply it to our team.
So, think of any player in the past four years you'd bring back for 2008.
My feeling is Aaron Rodgers. He's a great QB and he'd bolster the abilities of our inexperienced receiving corps. They're fast, he's accurate, and Jahvid Best is a beast. That'd be a great offense.
Maybe you'd bring back Beast Mode/Marshawn Lynch? Or even J.J. Arrington so he can rush for another 2000 yards in a season (season here meaning eleven games, not thirteen, okay Ray Rice?).
Maybe one would argue defense? Mebane? Dante Hughes?
Okay, I'm done now. You decide!
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
dante!
Any of those players would make a huge impact, but for the 2008 team, I’d vote for Hughes. It goes without saying that a lockdown corner is a difference maker, and Hughes was one of those rare playmakers that could put the skids on an offense PLUS put points on the board every now and then.
by totallyawesome on Jul 24, 2008 10:58 PM PDT reply actions
Rogers and it isn't close.
This actually is a great question. But, while I also think quarterback is a strength going into this season, Aaron Rodgers was near perfect. He would provide the leadership this team desperately needs and he would make life a lot easier with three green receivers.
Second place goes to Mebane who would make the transition to the 3-4 seamless.
http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/
Mebane
A dominant NT would really tie the defense together. Syd is turning into the shutdown CB that Hughes was.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
But just imagine
Syd now, with Dante on the other side. With two shutdown corners the QB could take almost as much time as they want, and still be looking for someone to pass to when Follett gets there.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
Yeah, that's tempting
but after watching spring ball, I’m much more concerned with our run defense than our pass defense. Mebane would solve potential run defense deficiencies.
But whenever I played franchises in Madden, I always traded for two shutdown corners right away. Aeneas Williams in Madden ‘96!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Alexander
I think I might vote for Lorenzo Alexander over Mebane. Skill-wise probably Mebane was a little better, but Lorenzo represented the best of the early Tedford guys (he was really happy to get to go to the Holiday Bowl in 2004) plus was a great leader, something this team desperately needs on the defensive side.
No slight to Mebane at all, a great player who also was a quiet, humble guy.
by Tedfordisgod on Jul 25, 2008 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed, Mebane
For this season, a dominant NT would shore up what I think will be our biggest weaknesses: stopping the run and all-around QB pressure. Maybe Alexander, though he took a long time to live up to expectations. Either way, all the other choices add depth to relatively strong positions, but Mebane would fill a potential void.
The Bear will not quit, the Bear will not die
but, but...
Derrick Hill!
Yeah, I know.
I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.
by yellow fever on Jul 25, 2008 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
For my first choice, I think I’d say it’d be Rodgers or Lynch. Those were the two best players to come through Cal during the Tedford era. Lynch would have more of an impact on a football team than Rodgers since a more dominant RB is more influential against a defense than a dominant QB. For my third choice, I’d say Daymeion Hughes. That guy was ridic.
Vote Brock Mansion for QB in 2008!
I love Marshawn, I do, my handle is BeastMode. But, I don’t think I’m the only one that was at least a little underwhelmed by his college performance. Don’t get me wrong, he was a force, a beast, but he never ran for more than 200 yards in a game and he average around 1300 yards and 12.5 touchdowns per full season – very good but not great numbers.
As for quarterbacks not as influential as running backs, I am going to have to disagree, at least as to whether there one is any more than the other. We had a very good to even great back in 2005 and 2007 yet because of shotty quarterback play, we underachieved.
http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/
“he never ran for more than 200 yards in a game.”
Uh, he was a dualback with Forsett. it’s hard to get 200 yards in a single game if you’re sharing half your carries with a pretty talented secondback.
by BearsNecessity on Jul 24, 2008 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Tell that to JJ Arrington who gave plenty of carries to Marshawn.
http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/
2006
Lynch: 223 carries, 1356 yds, 6.08 YPC
Forsett: 119 carries, 626 yds, 5.26 YPC
Just under a 2:1 ratio for carries
2005
Lynch: 196 carries, 1246 yds, 6.36 YPC
Forsett: 132 carries, 999 yds, 7.57 YPC
About a 1.5:1 ratio
2004
Arrington: 289 carries, 2018 yds, 6.98 YPC
Lynch: 71 carries, 628 yds, 8.85 YPC
Just over a 4:1 ratio
by BearsNecessity on Jul 25, 2008 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions
OK, well, given how many yards Marshawn ran for in 2004, it’s amazing he did it on only 71 carries. All that said, Marshawn had Heisman quality talent, it would have been nice to see him get the opportunity to make a real run at it.
Also, this sort of does point out that we plug pretty much anyone into the system, they will succeed. That is not the case with our quarterbacks.
http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/
You’ve nailed nothing.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Pay attention, this isn’t exactly news.
When you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose: it's how drunk you get.
I like the cut of your jib, GoBeers. It is a finely cut jib!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I think it’s a small wooden ship. The network is concerned about the lack of small wooden ships.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Ooh I’m sorry, the correct response was “Promote this man.” Thanks for playing quote trivia, better luck next time.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
An Anchorman reference is always the correct response.
Nobody tell Iricane.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Leave it to two Longshore-lovers to argue about what the proper quote reference is in a conversation only the two of them are having.
When you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose: it's how drunk you get.
You’re more than welcome to join the conversation, but first you have to complete the Longshore Oath Of Loyalty And Love. After that, it’s a quote off!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
A quote off? I'm going for the high score!
” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ”
” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” “
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
It’s official. History, people. First time ever, I have felt shame. Congrats to Maharg for evoking that rarest of the rare emotions in me!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I hereby solemnly swear
To avoid reasoned thought
To disregard visual and statistical evidence
To believe that sports are supposed to be “fair” and not competitive
And To turn off the television in the 4th quarter to protect my beliefs.
Now I can reach new lows like the rest of you!
When you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose: it's how drunk you get.
Al: Tim, I don’t like the cut of his jib.
Tim: Al, I don’t even think you’re supposed to be looking at his jib!”
by Spazzy Mcgee on Jul 25, 2008 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions
"What's a jib?" is a Simpsons quote...
... from Homer Simpson. He’s funny. And now you know.
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
It's ok...
Knowing is half the battle!!
GI JOE!!
I kissed Dumpster Muffin and I liked it. The taste of her hippie chapped lips.
if i’m picking one player to build my team around, i’m starting with either Marshawn or ARod. that wasn’t Rishi’s question, though.
personally, i don’t think either RB or QB will be a problem for the 2008 Bears. a defensive player like Mebane or Hughes, i think, would have a bigger impact.
one other name to consider: can we bring back Tom Schneider? i haven’t seen this Seawright kid kick, but I know losing Schneider was a rather big blow to last year’s team, and we could really use a big leg on kickoffs.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
wtf
Voted Ayoob? Although I suppose then the team’s theme song would just be Yakety Sax for the whole year.
I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.
I'll be all sentimental and say
Joe Roth.
That way nobody could argue that Longshore deserves to start!
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty" - every AL Manager to Bob Geren
i certainly wouldn’t mind seeing mcarthur back in a bears uniform…though would you take him over Hawk?
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by 


















































