FINAL REMINDER
by TwistNHook on Jul 24, 2008 3:11 PM PDT
in Memorial Stadium Upgrade
Email
PrintCity Hall Meeting Today at 5. I just spoke with CBKWit and he said the meeting with Councilmember Capitelli went well. However, this process is not over yet. Everybody's presence is more important than ever! As noted in the DBD, Volker really filed some sort of appeal. If he gets the Council on board, this could be BAD!
If you cannot make it at 5, do not worry. It was emphasized at the meeting that everybody who wants a chance to speak will get that chance. So, if you can come at 5:30 or even 6 or hell even 6:30. I predict it will be an insane circus and the public session will go for a while. Make your voices heard!
Democracy In Action!
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Meeting did go well (knock on wood) except for some loudmouth/vitriolic young guy in a red shirt who seemed intent on pissing Mr. Capitelli off. I was glad it didn’t turn out to be CBK. Actually come to think of it it was probably a furd.
And Mr. Capitelli said, basically, “if you want your voices to be heard by the council, the best way is to go to the friggin meetings.”
Just to clarify, was Capitelli pissed that people hadn’t shown up before and argued against the suit?
It seems that way from the 'friggin' you quoted.pissed? No, not at all. In fact I shouldn’t have put in quotes. THAT’S NOT A DIRECT QUOTE, EVERYONE.
He just said, basically, that showing up in person is a lot better than emails.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Jul 24, 2008 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
How many would you say attended the meeting with the Councilmember?
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Spazzy and I were the best looking
for sure. Except for our friend in the red shirt doing his best Geo Beach imitation.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Sounds like last night’s haircut panned out!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Actually he was doing his best Bizarro Treesitter impression.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Jul 24, 2008 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey, you guys are regular BFFs now!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Hippy Email
Dear Tree-sit supporters,Good news. Yesterday some “squirrels” climbed up into a tree and
managed to send six bags of food to the tree-sitters! (Two new tree-sitters
went into the grove, as well.) Watch the Berkeley Citizen video here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs0g9UTgB5Q
Ground supporters negotiated a deal with UC Police: in exchange for
dismantling the new line that was strung to the redwood tree, UC police
will allow one bag of food to go up to the tree-sitters every day.Tree-sitters are asking for dried fruits, nuts and seeds, sproutables,
and fresh food (e.g. produce) every day.So please – bring your food to the grove, so it can go up to the
tree-sitters! Come by whenever you can.If you have questions please call the ground support phone at
510-938-2109 (calling is better than emailing).Thank you,
The Oak Grove Tree-sitters
PS Don’t forget PLEASE come to the city council meeting today
(Thursday) before 5pm and get on the speakers list and ask the city to appeal
the lawsuit. Meet at the grove at 3:33pm, march to city hall, rally at
city hall at 4:44pm.
Well then, jolly squirrels, lets head on down to city council, shall we?
by RollOnYouBears667 on Jul 24, 2008 3:30 PM PDT reply actions
Hey Twist, I just heard on california.scout.com that the PHA was appealing the case too? Any validity to this rumor? http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=166&f=1419&t=2716482 (I figured the hippies would, but PHA would surprise me).
by SonofCalifornia on Jul 24, 2008 4:12 PM PDT reply actions
Yup, it was PHA.
07/24/08 Notice of Appeal Filed by Panoramic Hill Association
Looking through the order, it specifically says ‘PHA vs. UC’.
We started discussing this in the DBD. Take my complete and total lack of nolej about CEQA and AP law and divide that by infinity to get my nolej on appeals law. However, OakTownMario, resident legal scholar, notes this in his post.
nothing earth shattering and basically simple procedure preserving the opportunity to file the appeal
Somebody over there noted that Volker filed both of these appeals, so he might just be doing this for the PHA, I don’t know.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Just noticed
Just noticed this, hasn’t been put up on the court site quite yet.
07/24/08 Notice to Attorney re Notice of Appeal Filed
Any idea what this could be??? I’m hoping for a ‘F—- You Volker, you can’t file an appeal. – Sincerely, Judge Miller’
I need to stop compulsively checking websites and get some work done. This can’t be healthy :)
It might just be a proof of service that they noticed Olson about the Notice. Although not 100% sure, I am going to assume that filing this appeal doc rises to the level to require notice. So, Volker and Co. would have to notice all interested parties. Off the top of my head, that might be what ti is. I like your idea better, tho!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Recent FanShots
About Us
• About the Golden Bloggers
• Our previous site @ Blogsome
• Avinash @ Bears Necessity
• Best of the Golden Blogs
• Golden Blogs Interviews
• HydroTech's Cal Football Analyses
• Ron Fimrite's Anatomy Of A Miracle
• CGB Weekly Guides
• GoldenBlogs' Community Guidelines
• GoldenBlogs' FAQ
• CGB GIF Army
Learn More About The California Golden Blogs Clothing Store
Pac-12 On SBN
Pacific Takes (Pac-12) NORTH AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)
UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)
CougCenter: (Washington State)
BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)
Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)
SOUTH
BruinsNation: (UCLA)
ConquestChronicles: (USC)
HouseOfSparky: (ASU)
Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)
TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)
Block U: (Utah)
Golden Bears Football Schedule
| Fresno St. | Sat 09/03 | W 36 - 21 |
@
Colorado
|
Sat 09/10 | W 36 - 33 |
| Presbyterian | Sat 09/17 | W 63 - 12 |
|
@
Washington
|
Sat 09/24 | L 23 - 31 |
|
@
Oregon
|
Thu 10/06 | L 15 - 43 |
|
USC
|
Thu 10/13 | L 9 - 30 |
|
Utah
|
Sat 10/22 | W 34 - 10 |
|
@
UCLA
|
Sat 10/29 | L 14 - 31 |
|
Washington St.
|
Sat 11/05 | W 30 - 7 |
|
Oregon St.
|
Sat 11/12 | W 23 - 6 |
|
@
Stanford
|
Sat 11/19 | L 28 - 31 |
|
@
Arizona St.
|
Fri 11/25 | W 47 - 38 |
|
@
Texas
|
Wed 12/28 | L 10 - 21 |
Pacific-12 Conference Standings
(updated 1.2.2012 at 11:12 PM PST)
| North | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
Oregon Ducks
|
8 | 1 | 12 | 2 |
|
Stanford Cardinal
|
8 | 1 | 11 | 2 |
|
Washington Huskies
|
5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
|
California Golden Bears
|
4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
|
Oregon St. Beavers
|
3 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
|
Washington St. Cougars
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| South | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
USC Trojans
|
7 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
|
UCLA Bruins
|
5 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|
Utah Utes
|
4 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
|
Arizona St. Sun Devils
|
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
Arizona Wildcats
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
|
Colorado Buffaloes
|
2 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
