California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:

Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows

Court Ruling and Tree Sitter Open Thread (Part II)

Script_cal_tiny by HydroTech on in Memorial Stadium Upgrade

Because the previous thread got too long and too slow... here's another one.  Post away....

0 recs | Comment 229 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is so stupid (watching on KRON).

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 5:38 PM PDT   0 recs

Martyr

Will people really feel bad for her if she shakes and falls?

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 5:38 PM PDT   0 recs

FIRST!

aw, crap.

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 5:38 PM PDT   0 recs

TwistNHook had to go home or something. He’ll be back shortly.

by HydroTech on Jun 18, 2008 5:38 PM PDT   0 recs

aww man

I liked the old one. it had more comments, anyway. IM NOT IN THE BAY AREA RIGHT NOW! WHATIS IT SAYING ON KRON????

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 5:39 PM PDT   0 recs

WTF

what are they basing this on?

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I have no idea why the ruling is getting delayed (if it’s true that we won’t hear until tomorrow).

by HydroTech on Jun 18, 2008 5:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Dumpster Muffin is shaking her box almost threatening to fall or jump. The KRON reporters are beffudled though one anchor said the UC is at fault because they should have dealt with it earlier.

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 5:40 PM PDT   0 recs

Wow, that KRON reporter is incredibly stupid!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Jun 18, 2008 6:01 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

WE NEED SOMEONE STRONG

someone that doesn’t mind busting the knee caps of dainty ice skaters to get things done. Lets send tonya to deal with the hippies.

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 5:42 PM PDT   0 recs

We need a big net and a chainsaw.

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 5:42 PM PDT   0 recs

wow

so…starving them out, eh?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 5:55 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

burning is better

faster and saves the UC of the cost of cutting down the trees.

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 5:56 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I’m amazed at how the God Pod is staying up there. It looks like it hardly has any support.

by HydroTech on Jun 18, 2008 5:56 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

and seriously,

the woman (I can’t bring myself to type her name) was doing her best to shake it so hard that it falls over.

by sec119 on Jun 18, 2008 5:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

if it falls on its own

then they can’t blame the UC. that would be a perfect solution.

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 5:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

See y'all

Time to go home. What a wonderfully wasted day.

Preesh!

by CalBandGreat on Jun 18, 2008 5:43 PM PDT   0 recs

dammit

I was wasting time other ways all afternoon, and missed this epic thread(s). Anyway, lots of helicopters over campus.

by sec119 on Jun 18, 2008 5:46 PM PDT   0 recs

when we wake up tomorrow...

...nothin’ but stumps. sweet dreams, all!

by mwpfoot on Jun 18, 2008 5:46 PM PDT   0 recs

let me get this straight

you’re going to bed at 5:50 and you are going to dream about a grove of stumps.
?¿?¿?¿?¿?

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

no, i'm going to a previous engagement now...

...and i am going to dream about a grove of stumps LATER.

by mwpfoot on Jun 18, 2008 5:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

on a related note...

given how tight the perimeter fence, maybe the UCPD could release some city raccoons to encourage the tree sitters to come down…

by sec119 on Jun 18, 2008 5:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

crap

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:02 PM PDT   0 recs

so, a friend at the grove tells me that the tree people heard the ruling and were then cheering

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:03 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't have TV...

but a friend who is watching is saying the injunction won’t be dissolved.

by HydroTech on Jun 18, 2008 6:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

FUCKING GAY. What the fuck is wrong with these people? HOW CAN IT NOT!?

In other words, Go Bears!

by royrules22 on Jun 18, 2008 6:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

same friend has a friend who is working for some lawyers on this case…she’s reading the decision now, apparently

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

changed my mind

I might as well stick around for another 5 minutes

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 6:06 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

no idea how long it's gonna take

but i’m now optimistic we’ll hear something tonight

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

haas pavilion is what i’m hearing, although tree protesters may announce something at the grove

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

see you later, everyone

I’ll check back in an hour

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 18, 2008 6:03 PM PDT   0 recs

here we go

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 6:04 PM PDT   0 recs

I don't think we will find out today... )-;

This is great, I leave for over an hour only to come back and see there is no new news. I did see that almost all Bay Area news channels opened their five o’clock news hour covering this story, yet they didn’t have any news on the ruling either!

by CaliSeth on Jun 18, 2008 6:05 PM PDT   0 recs

I just caught part of KRONs thing. They said the ruling came out and the people were cheering.

REGISTER OF ACTIONS SAYS HTIS:

06/18/08 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitions for Writ of Mandate. Filed

NOTHING IS UP TO SEE IT TOHUGH!!!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Jun 18, 2008 6:09 PM PDT   0 recs

what does this mean?

In other words, Go Bears!

by royrules22 on Jun 18, 2008 6:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Mixed decision - i guess

i hope not… i really hope not.

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 6:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

this judge has been hedging her decisions from the very beginning

trying not to piss off either side too much…why would we expect any different with the final ruling?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:13 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

NAME THIS GAME/YEAR

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 6:10 PM PDT   0 recs

1. We won.
2. We won.
3. We won.
4. We won.
5. We won.
6. We won.
7. We won.

by BearsNecessity on Jun 18, 2008 6:14 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

true
true
false
true
false
false
true

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 6:17 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I’ve got:
1. Oregon 2006 (TD with “squat” after it)
2. BYU 2005 (Blue uniforms, red numbers on the field)
3. OSU 2007 (2007 home game we lost in blue uniforms)
4. Oregon 2007 (Pretty indelible image from that game)
5. ASU 2007 (Night game, all white uniforms, we lost)
6. OSU 2007, warmups? (see 3)
7. BYU 2005 (the “swimming” TD!)

by berk18 on Jun 18, 2008 8:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

WOW!!!!

impressive. Correct on all 7. Well done berk… the ASU and OSU pics were real hard, even for me… and I posted them!

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 10:20 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

PHA Rep on NBC

says the university lost on a number of counts

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:15 PM PDT   0 recs

Don't rely too much on the media

they manage to suck at grasping the meaning of legal decisions.

by oaktownmario on Jun 18, 2008 6:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Unlikely to be that simple

The real question is whether the injunction is lifted or stays.

by tmoran3020 on Jun 18, 2008 6:18 PM PDT   0 recs

Well

You have to think they already have a revised plan ready to roll, right?

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 6:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Doubtful

You have to know what the judge thinks your deficiencies are before you can correct them.

by tmoran3020 on Jun 18, 2008 6:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

this is just a delay then... they are not making us scrap the plans and create new ones

... which is partially what we expected. We refile with revised plans that meet with the judges approval and then we continue…

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 6:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Is that the order?

Because a judge isn’t going to “approve” anything. That would make her a participant in the plan. . . sounds odd to me.

by oaktownmario on Jun 18, 2008 6:26 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Okay, so I’m thinking we didn’t outright “win” since we can’t build right this instant, but we didn’t “lose” either since we aren’t barred from building at all. We can build as long as we comply with the requirements of the SEQA and the A-P, right?

by HydroTech on Jun 18, 2008 7:02 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

the question is

if Miller is asking just for the plans to be updated and thus the construction is delayed… but allowed to continue once the enviro plans are updated.

by danzig on Jun 18, 2008 6:20 PM PDT   0 recs

Domain Web is slow again. Fudge! I dont want to take PHAs word for it.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Jun 18, 2008 6:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

cbs reporting

pha says they won almost everything

by sec119 on Jun 18, 2008 6:22 PM PDT   0 recs

cbs also says

university will announce something at 8 pm

by sec119 on Jun 18, 2008 6:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It isnt all that bad, reading . . .

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 6:26 PM PDT   0 recs

If you get in, look at Page 3 where it say sIntro. Ive gotten that far, but it seems to me that Berkeley won on that. I cant C+P, BUT its basically says we are in compliance with most of the shit. A few exceptions. I havent read what the exceptions are yet, though.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Jun 18, 2008 6:30 PM PDT   0 recs

i’m reading it now…it basically says the project complies with alquist-priolo and CEQA…with certain exceptions. meaning things have to be fixed before the injuction can be lifted.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Jun 18, 2008 6:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

So is it more like “injunction lifted with preconditions”? or , “injunction stayed with excuses”? Also, what page does it start getting interesting?

by trisweb on Jun 18, 2008 6:33 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Thats pretty much right, we mostly comply with AP

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 6:31 PM PDT   0 recs

The only thing thus far I have seen

is that they won on whether AP applies to the project.

http://sportingcontrarian.wordpress.com/

by BeastMode on Jun 18, 2008 6:32 PM PDT   0 recs

CONCLUSION

P129

The court shall retain jurisdiction over those proceedings, by way of return to peremptory writ, until it has determined that Respondents have complied with CEQA and Arquist-Priolo.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/S/

Giant, Slow Bitch.

by Spazzy Mcgee on Jun 18, 2008 6:33 PM PDT   0 recs

z

Two deadlines:

June 24 for Writ of Mandate and proposed judg