California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



Armed Forces Bowl Review: Part III: Pass to Forsett at Flanker

In this third installment of approximately a 12 play analysis, we're going to look at moving the pocket, the resulting read progressions of the moving pocket, and the purpose of having routes in the direction of the movement.  In case you missed the previous installments, here is Part I, and Part II.

Let's begin.

Star-divide

Below is the pre-snap formation.  The situation is a 1st and 10 with Cal in its own territory.  Cal has base personnel on the field (2 backs, 2 WRs, 1 TE).  They are in a strong-I formation with both WRs to the side of the TE who is on the left side of the offensive line.  Because the rules require 7 men on the LOS, one of the WRs (the slot WR) is on the LOS and thus covering up the TE, and thus the TE is an ineligible receiver.  Air Force is defending in their base 3-4 defense with man coverage.  Notice how both AF CBs are on both on the same side of the field covering the twin WRs (as opposed to traditional zone coverage schemes which place one CB on each side of the defense).  Cal puts the RB (Forsett) into motion out at flanker to the right.

Cal_c1_medium

Air Force adjusts to this by moving their free safety (FS) over to play man coverage on Forsett. 

Cal_c2_medium

Below is the pre-snap formation just prior to the snap of the ball.  Notice AF has 7 defenders in the box, playing man coverage on the 3 receivers, and is showing a cover 1 (one deep safety - I have put a red dot on the edge of the screen since he is barely visible).

Cal_c3_medium

Here is the post-snap picture.  The play is a pass play - which was extremely likely since there was no RB in the backfield.  The play calls for a QB half roll left.  Notice how the QB (Longshore) has his upper body turned left and has slightly rolled out left on his seven step drop.  Also notice how the offensive line on the weak side (offense's right) has dropped back and given up space to the defenders while the strong side of the offensive line has maintained a blocking wall parallel to the LOS.  I have illustrated this with the thin blue line.  How can you tell which way the QB is probably going to roll to if the play calls for a half roll?  Strength of the offense.  Tedford's plays always half roll out to the strength of the offense (in this play, to the left because the TE and fullback were on that side).

The first reads of this play are to the strong side (offense's left).  This is because the QB is rolling out in that direction.  It would be extremely hard and inefficient for the QB to try and read the field opposite of direction he is rolling out to first. 

Longshore expertly executes his reads and looks left at the 2 WRs to that side of the field (represented by the green vision cone).  They are both covered with man coverage.  Notice how the two AF MLBs (middle linebackers) have dropped into zone coverage and respond to Longshore's eyes looking left (represented by the red arrows).  At this point Longshore already knows where he's going with the ball.  Despite knowing already where he was going to throw the ball, he still had to go through his first two progressions.  Why?  To move the linebackers.

Cal_c4_medium

By continuing to go through his progressions, Longshore has moved the AF MLBs away from the receiver Longshore knows is going to be open.  How did Longshore know Forsett would be open?  Well, Longshore knew Forsett would be running a post.  Longshore saw how deep the AF FS was playing Forsett (see the 3rd image above).  Longshore knew the AF MLBs would not only react to the half roll by following Longshore's location, but also they would react to his eyes reading the 2 WRs.  In the picture below, you can see that Longshore has turned his body to the offense's right and has a clear unimpeded lane to throw to Forsett (represented by the green vision cone).  Forsett is wide open (represented by the blue box).

Cal_c5_medium

Brief side note - one thing to note is that all the receiving routes are in the direction of the QB half-roll.  The Cal flanker (WR at the bottom of the screen above) ran a short hitch, the Cal split end (WR in the slot) is running a flag route left (like a post route but to the outside), and the RB (Forsett) is running a post left.  This is important because the QB is reading from his left to right, and thus, since the receiving routes (of the slot WR, and RB) are going left, the QB is reading the defenders in front of the receivers.  Thus, when the QB throws the ball and leads the receiver, he knows he's not throwing blind to a defender he hasn't seen yet.  On the other hand, if the QB started his progressions from the left to right, and was throwing the ball to a receiver running left to right, the QB is throwing a lead pass blind and possibly at a defender that the QB hasn't seen/read yet.

Longshore throws a strike (I've highlighted the ball with a yellow dot).  

Cal_c6_medium

Forsett catches the ball, and only has one defender to beat for a big gain and possibly a touchdown.  Unfortunately, Forsett doesn't break the tackle, but he does make the catch.  This play had a very good opportunity to go for big yardage considering how far off the AF safety played Forsett, and how far away the other AF defenders were located (represented below the red dots on the AF players and the green box representing how much space Forsett had from the other defenders.

Cal_c7_medium

Regarding this play, I think Tedford had scouted out Air Force's defensive tendencies and (1) knew that they would play a safety on a RB split out as a WR, and/or (2) wanted to try and exploit the safety by making him essentially play CB (cornerback).  Tedford got what he wanted, and the play was only one broken tackle away from being a big gain and maybe even a touchdown. 

So what did we learn here?  Air Force appears to play man coverage when facing twinned WRs so the twin WRs cannot overload a zone defense.  Air Force will put a safety on a RB split out instead of putting a linebacker on the RB (which would just be asking to get scored on).  Half roll protections can be identified by watching the offensive line to see if one side gives up space, and by whether the QB is rolling towards the strength of the offense.  The QB's progressions start out in the direction he's moving, and it's important when designing plays to have routes going in the direction that the QB begins his reads. 

This play was executed very well be the offense.  The offensive line provided excellent protection, and Longshore expertly went through his reads, moved the safeties and threw a strike.

Check back in a few days for Part IV.

0 recs | Comment 30 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

One of your best posts, Hydro

Well done. But I still fully expect the Nate haters to jump in soon. After all, he was “only” 4 for 5 for about 40 yards after this play. It’s amazing Tedford didn’t go to Riley even sooner with crappy first-quarter numbers like that! (Yes, sarcasm fully intended.)

Two quick questions: (1) Why did Forsett cut back toward the sideline when his momentum after the catch was up the center of the field? (2) Could this play be tweaked just a little bit to place Forsett up on the LOS, allowing the split end on the left to step back and uncover the tight end? Assuming that the fullback can pick up the rushing outside linebacker, it appears the tight end could then exploit that space left open by the strong safety when he rotated into the free safety’s center-field spot. Might some of the success that Riley enjoyed later in the game have been set up by these maneuverings when Longshore was still in the game?

Go Bears!

by California Pete on May 28, 2008 11:58 AM PDT   0 recs

CA Pete, I’m glad you liked the post. I will try and answer your questions.

(1) Forsett appears to be cutting back towards the sideline in the pictures above because the pass was slightly behind Forsett. Forsett caught the ball and did a little 180 to his left because it was slightly behind him (or the ball was properly placed and Forsett’s route wasn’t quite what it needed to be). Alternatively, Longshore might have been weary about leading Forsett any more to prevent the INT. Although the ball was placed slightly behind Forsett, it was placed in a manner that put Forsett between the ball and the defender thus making for a very hard breakup for the defender.

(2) A very thought provoking question. Yes, the formation could have been changed to put Forsett at SE and on the LOS thus the slot WR can step off the LOS to become a flanker and thus uncovering the TE to make the TE an eligible receiver. And yes, the TE probably could have then been sent out on a route to attack the SS. Perhaps a go route or skinny post. This would demand that the SS choose between dropping down to cover the TE and giving up deep safety help for the FS, or staying deep and giving up the pass to the TE (assuming the AF LBs in zone don’t get enough depth to take away the pass to the TE).

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 12:30 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Hydro, great post and analysis. Keep them coming.

I don’t agree with the prevent INT or the ball was placed in a manner that made it harder for the defender to breakup the pass explaination, because Forsett was so wide open on that play. The simple answer to why Forsett cut back towards the sideline was because Longshore didn’t throw a strike, he didn’t hit Forsett in stride and the ball was thrown behind him and Forsett had to adjust for the ball. It’s little things like this that makes Longshore a good QB, but not a great QB.

Longshore was 5/8 for 36 yards. Yes Desa dropped that 4th down pass but Longshore wasn’t exactly lighting things up. Y/A of 4.5 wasn’t anything to get excited about.

No, I’m not a Nate hater, I know he’s a student athlete, a solid QB and I’ll support whoever is the QB for Cal in 2008. But lets not kid ourselves and say Longshore can do no wrong and it’s always someone elses fault. Like “ball was properly placed and Forsett’s route wasn’t quite what it needed to be.” We’ve heard that plenty of times whenever Nate throws a game killing 4th quarter INT.

by cal98 on May 30, 2008 11:26 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

An average y/a is not a bad thing (never mind that y/a is a terrible stat for QBs). In fact those short passes are very valuable and they open up your running game quite a bit.

I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs

by royrules22 on May 30, 2008 2:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Cal98

I agree 100% that we just can’t say that Longshore can do no wrong. But we can’t just always assume that because Longshore throws an INT that it’s entirely Longshore’s fault either. There is a medium. Sometimes the QB may be 90% at fault. Sometimes somebody else (the WR, or OL) may be 70% at fault. Too often, Longshore gets 100% of the blame when he should get much less.

by HydroTech on May 31, 2008 3:53 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

A wonderful post Hydro. Now I can finally stop throwing picks in NCAA 08 (atleast with one play)! :p

I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs

by royrules22 on May 28, 2008 2:28 PM PDT   0 recs

Throwing INTs in NCAA 08

Passing in EA’s NCAA College Football game is hard. It’s very difficult to accurately press the button with the desired amount of lob. Usually, I end up lobbing the ball more than I’d like, or throwing more of a bullet than I’d like. And because the linebackers in the game have super jump abilities, it always seems like I can never throw a nice touch pass (but not a high lob) over the linebackers; they always swat it down. Usually I just bullet pass in windows, or motion to get a man coverage mis-match. Totally off-topic response, I know, sorry.

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 3:36 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The key

is to find the glitch in the game that allows for a cheap play. I forget the game, but I used to play a football game religiously where the RB shovel pass play was glitchy. The start of the play was a pass to the RB that was completed 100% of the time.

However, you could position the RB pretty much anywhere on the field as the play was developing. You only had a few seconds, before the shovel pass started. But you could generally get the RB at least 5 years into the defense, ensuring at least 5 yard gains per play. See if there are any of those in NCAA 08.

What’s the lesson here, kids? If you aren’t cheating, you aren’t trying.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on May 28, 2008 3:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

as eddie guerrero would say

VIVA LA RAZA!

I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.

by yellow fever on May 28, 2008 7:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks for the great analysis again. What is the advantage of the half roll, as opposed to a 5- or 7-step drop for a pass like this? Also, I suddenly had an image of a Rickroll….

I hate to ask this in my first post … but would anyone have a video of the game they could upload? Pretty please?

by jello on May 28, 2008 3:42 PM PDT   0 recs

half roll can be nice because since the qb isn’t committing to a full roll it makes the defense have to guard more of the field-you really
limit yourself on a full rollout depending on field/sideline position…
half roll is also less time consuming nice for when a line is struggling.

by Itchy25 on May 28, 2008 3:52 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

jello

Itchy25 brings up a good point. Also, the half rolls are a good way to move the pocket and move the passer more towards the center of the field (if the ball is along one of the hashes).

Jello, the games are available here in dvd image (.iso) form.

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 4:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

and HT- thanks again for this analysis its absolutely fascinating.

on an off topic note, what is the pre-game scene like for Cal football games? BBQ? Beer? I’m counting the seconds till my first game.

by Itchy25 on May 28, 2008 4:43 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm actually going to kind of do some posts on this

But I can do a little now. On the Gameday Scene.

The Cal Gameday scene is vastly different than most gameday scenes. At other schools (esp. in the South), people dress up with nice shirts and party all day long. Over at Cal, the scenesters amongst us dress up with a campy appreciation of ironic fashion. Most of the time is spent knitting as if we were in certain coffeeshops in the Mission. Most talk is centered around how you (as a Cal football fan) appreciated Slocum and Vereen back when they were underground. Before they sold out to the Man. Some talk also centers around how frustrating straightening irons can be. Other appropriate conversation topics include recent finds at local thrift shops and how poorly dressed the other 70,000 fans are in comparison to you.

When people enter the stadium (fashionably late, of course), few, if any, focus on the game. Those who do are roundly judged by the more “intelligent” fans. I mean Cal fans, of course, pay attention to the game, but in a way that shows they aren’t really trying too hard to pay attention to the game.

Oh and, of course, we all wear incredibly tight jeans. I mean just brutally tight jeans. At least until people start wearing incredibly tight jeans in places like Kansas and Arkansas. Then, those are so five minutes ago!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on May 28, 2008 5:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

fyi

to itchy (and anyone else reading this who isn’t familiar with twist’s “unique” brand of humor), twist’s comments are really only applicable to himself. if he mentions other people or topics, it is only to discuss how they relate to him, and whether they make him look better in the mirror or not. please don’t credit his words with sincerity that isn’t there.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on May 28, 2008 5:30 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

lol
noted

by Itchy25 on May 28, 2008 5:32 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

pre-game scene

itchy, that’s a question that deserves a whole entire post (or two) by itself. remind us in july!

from my personal experience, you can find lots of beer and bbq on frat row (piedmont), quite a scene at the local bars (henry’s, blake’s, bear’s lair), and plenty of tailgates in various parking lots. unfortunately, due to how berkeley is laid out, all of the parking is spread all over the campus area, so there’s no one central tailgating area.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on May 28, 2008 5:27 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

awesome- ill look forward to that from you and Twist.

and Twist- i’ve heard many many similar sounding discussions from fans at the rosebowl during bruin games. thankfully the mega tight jeans (MTJ) popularity was spotty..

by Itchy25 on May 28, 2008 5:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

As an underage Cal fan who likes to yell throughout the game (alcohol makes you tired and unable to do that) I can tell you the pre-game scene is boring as f**k. No tailgating (besides frat row). I usually get something to eat (because hot dogs are expensive at Memorial) and a LARGE bottle of water and walk over to the student entrance. I usually get there 1/2 hr before gates open (and I’m almost always the firs there) because I like sitting right up to the Rally Comm people.

BTW the security are assholes. They’ll make you throw out your water if the bottle is open.

PS: The bathrooms SUCK

I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs

by royrules22 on May 28, 2008 6:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

bathrooms

god, the bathrooms DO suck. if i have a choice between dehydration and having to use the restrooms during the game, i’ll err towards the side of dehydration.

of course, that’s safer to try during night games…

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on May 28, 2008 6:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

water

I second the idea of bringing in your own big bottle of water. Whether you pre-game partied or not, you don’t want to be spending $5 or whatever it is for a small bottle of water inside of the stadium. If you forget to bring your own water bottle (or forget to buy one at the student store/market thing) sometimes there are some students selling bottled water by the I-House for $1.

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 11:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

and im thinking those same watering holes are going to be the spot to catch away games?

by Itchy25 on May 29, 2008 12:55 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

away games

yeah, i’d imagine they’d be pretty good. i’ve also watched away games at Triple Rock on Shattuck, and The Royal Exchange (a Cal-alum owned bar in S.F.’s financial district). honestly, though, I’m not the best person to ask, as over the past 8 years, I’ve probably watched the majority of Cal’s away games in person.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on May 29, 2008 8:10 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Here’s the video. I found it on Youtube (they have the whole set). I think it’s a few seconds in the roll.

I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs

by royrules22 on May 28, 2008 4:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Not to be picky, but...
The Cal flanker (WR at the bottom of the screen above) ran a short hitch, the Cal split end (WR in the slot) is running…

You got the flanker and split end mixed up, the flanker is the slot man. But other than that, good post.

by NorCalLonghorn on May 28, 2008 5:45 PM PDT   0 recs

Hmm...

Perhaps we have different understandings of what is a flanker and split end.

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 8:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

flanker and split end

Isn’t a flanker any receiver who lines up off the LOS, and a split end any receiver who lines up on the LOS? That would make Hydro correct, as usual.

I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.

by yellow fever on May 28, 2008 8:20 PM PDT   0 recs

Well

All I know is that when a receiver, the split end, is “split out”, that means he is furthest from the ball, meaning not the slot man.

by NorCalLonghorn on May 28, 2008 10:40 PM PDT   0 recs

I see what you’re saying but I think YellowFever has given the proper definition.

by HydroTech on May 28, 2008 11:01 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I gotta admit

Sometimes I get a little _ when I read some of these posts, but this one was brilliant. Very well done.

Oh, and I feel ya on that NCAA pass difficulty. I still managed to get Longshore to set the all time single season passing record, prompting him to go pro after his junior year though…in the game that is.

by bearswithfangs on May 30, 2008 1:12 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the 3rd Best Sports-Oriented Cal Blog on the net, where WE HAVE THE AXE and we're taking it on the Brock Mansion Party Yacht!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bendermonocledon_small
thenick's Emerald Bowl pics
Bear__small
Emerald Bowl / End of Season Review: A microcosm of everything that is good and bad about college football fandom (with pictures!)
Jackblack_small
More Emerald Bowl Photos
Small
Recruiting Update
Follett_small
Emerald Bowl Photos!

Recent FanPosts

Small
New Cal Recruit, Mark Brazinski, C
Script_cal_small
DBD 01.04.09 & 01.05.09 Aloha Fiesta Bowl
More_cascades_small
More (mediocre) Emerald Bowl Photos
Bnavatar_small
BCS vs. Playoffs Debate
Small
Pac-10 Bowl Idea
Bnavatar_small
DBD 1.02.08 Cotton Bowl Open Thread
Follett_small
DBD 1.01.2009: Tedford signs contract extension!
Rated-r_small
Cal to Land Five-Star Wide Receiver Recruit?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

The FanPost Hall of Fame

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Emerald Bowl Highlights

Recent FanShots

Womens BB vs St. Mary's Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Torrent
Cal vs Portland Basketball Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Pep Rally Pictures and Videos and more
Thanks to Okaydo from BI with the tip.
Isi Sofele HS Highlights
Marshawn Lynch vs Jets
Huskies poached our Offensive Line Coach

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

P4572527reg_small yellow fever

ad

Site Meter