California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Eagles miracle run continues with road win over the Vikings Bar-right-arrows



Armed Forces Bowl Review: Part II: Pass Blocking Problems

In this second installment of approximately a 12 play analysis, we look at poor pass blocking which ultimately lead to Cal's offensive struggles in the first quarter of the Armed Forces Bowl.  In case you missed the previous installment, here is Part I

Let's begin.

Star-divide

Here's the pre-snap picture. Cal is under center in a strong-I formation with 21 personnel (2 backs, 1 TE, 2 WRs).  There is one WR on each side of the offense.  The strength of the offense is left (because the TE is left).  The formation is a strong-I because the fullback is lined up behind the tackle to the side of the TE.  Air Force is once against defending in their base 3-4 defense (this picture provides a perfect view which shows how AF's 3 down-linemen are lined up heads up on the Cal center, and tackles).  The situation is a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.

Cal_b1_medium

Here's the post-snap picture. The play is a pass play with a half roll left.  We know it's a half roll left because Tedford likes to half-roll towards either the fullback or TE.  Plus, we know it's a half roll because it's a 7 step drop, and the QB slightly rolls out.  Plus, the backside of the OL gives up space, whereas the playside of the OL stands their ground at the LOS (hard to see).   We know it's a half roll to the offense's left (as opposed to their right) because the QB (Longshore) drops back with his upper body facing left and starting his drop with his left foot.  The play has a lite playaction fake - notice Forsett faking the handoff.  This is not a max-protect because TE Stevens is releasing out as is Forsett and fullback Tau'ufo'ou.

Cal_b2_medium

Already though, there are problems with the pass blocking in this play.  Below are two screen-grabs which show the problems.  The first shows Cal's RG getting turned and allowing the AF weak inside linebacker (WILB) to shoot the right A-gap (the gap between a center and guard).  The second shows AF's RE speed rushing to the outside on Cal's LT (the C-gap).  This is problematic because the QB is rolling out to that side.  The side that the QB rolls out to must have impenetrable protection.

Cal_b21_medium

Cal_b22_medium

The effect of the two non-desirable blocks are shown below.  Longshore has barely completed his half-roll, and already has two defenders coming at him (more or less) unimpeded.  Longshore only has a split second to throw the ball away to avoid a sack.

Cal_b3_medium

Longshore barely gets the pass off and purposely overthrows a ball to TE Stevens where nobody but Stevens can catch the ball.  The pass does fall incomplete, but most importantly, Longshore saved a sack.

Cal_b4_medium

What did we learn from this play?  Poor OL blocking led to another failed play.  This time, two players were beat by their defenders.  Sure, Longshore maybe could have thrown a slightly less overthrown ball to Stevens and Stevens might have caught it.  Or maybe Longshore might have hit Tau'ufo'ou instead.  But the two players that were most at fault on this play were the RG and LT for allowing slightly premature pressure on the QB.  

This play demonstrates one of Longshore's strength, his ability to throw the ball away and not take sacks.  In 2007, Longshore was only sacked 6 times.  That's 6 times on 384 attempts.  That's a sack every 1.56% of the time.  Who's to praise for such a low number?  Well, the obvious place to look is the offensive line.  They did alright for most of 2007, but when it came to pass protection, Longshore made their stats look even better by avoiding sacks. 

People wonder what Tedford sees in Longshore that justifies Longshore being deemed the starter.  Well, like it or not, this is one of the great traits that Longshore has - he takes care of the ball.  I know some of you are probably thinking that Longshore also threw a lot of INTs too so he can't obviously take care of the ball that much.  Well, if you consider how many of those INTs were because of missed/poor OL blocks, and other factors (QB/WR mis-communications, wrong WR routes, hail mary situations), and not just unforced errors by Longshore, he really does take very good care of the ball. 

Just like a great OL can make a mediocre QB look great, a good QB can hide the errors of OL pass-blocking mistakes.

So far, the two plays we've gone over have shown how the big hog mollies up front were losing the battle against Air Force.  As I said in the previous post, I like to believe that the games truly are won in the trenches.  Thus far, I think Air Force was winning in the trenches and that's why the offense was stymied in the first quarter while Longshore was the QB.

Check back in a few days for Part III.

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This analysis is interesting because I was of the impression that the 2007 OL was a pretty damn good unit (though I learned better after those 1st and goal stops)

I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs

by royrules22 on May 26, 2008 4:12 PM PDT   0 recs

There are missed assignments on every single play.

When the quarterback is somewhat immobile, the d. can afford to be overly aggressive. Please don’t drink the same Kool-aid that they guzzle over on the Cal Insucker site. Longshore is not a very good quarterback. He’s not bad, but average, at best, for a senior.

Free at last. January 20, 2009

by poohbears on May 26, 2008 8:02 PM PDT   0 recs

that's true, but

I think it’s worth giving Longshore the benefit of the doubt, just a bit. He did get the team off to a good start, and performed well in 2006. Rob Neyer likes to say that when a player performs significantly worse than his career line, injuries are a common reason, whether they’re publicly known or not. And Longshore’s ankle was obviously hurting.

The argument can be made (and has been, ad nauseum) about whether or not Longshore should have been playing with his injured ankle to begin with, but to say he’s not a very good quarterback would be to completely disregard evidence to the contrary.

I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.

by yellow fever on May 27, 2008 6:45 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yellow Fever

I’m still wondering why Doc Rivers won’t play Leon Powe in the playoffs. (Not that I’ve ever claimed to understand basketball, particularly of the NBA variety.)

Go Bears!

by California Pete on May 28, 2008 7:43 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Powe

I told myself that I was going to follow the NBA playoffs this year, specifically the Celtics, just to see Powe play. But where is he? Every time I try to watch, he’s on the bench. So I haven’t followed the playoffs, and I no longer particularly care if the Celtics win. Boo on you, Doc Rivers.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on May 28, 2008 8:13 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

from what I've gathered

Doc Rivers is basically a moron, and is inclined to play Glen “Big Baby” Davis over him. He also doesn’t like that Powe misses a couple of defensive assignments a game (which is understandable), and usually plays either Davis or Powe the minutes at backup PF each game. Exactly which one is probably dependent on a coin flip ten minutes before the game.

I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.

by yellow fever on May 28, 2008 7:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

AF wasn’t hideous last year.

by Itchy25 on May 27, 2008 2:14 AM PDT   0 recs

Wonder why they chose to double the NG. Mack is by far the best lineman, so why not help the strong side tackle?

by OskiMonsta on May 27, 2008 5:53 AM PDT   1 recs

Oski Monsta

I had similar a similar question about the guards’ blocking assignments on Hydro’s first post in this series. It will be interesting to see how Cal adjusted to the quickness displayed by the Falcons’ front three during the first quarter.

And poohbears, if you saw Longshore play in 2006, I think you’ve got to give him a little benefit of the doubt. No, he wasn’t nearly as good in 2007 as we all had hoped. But even after the ankle injury, he wasn’t quite as bad-at least not during the first halves-as his detractors claim. I wanted Riley playing down the stretch last year, too. But I’ll still have confidence in Nate should he win the battle in camp this summer.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on May 27, 2008 7:28 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the 3rd Best Sports-Oriented Cal Blog on the net, where WE HAVE THE AXE and we're taking it on the Brock Mansion Party Yacht!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bendermonocledon_small
thenick's Emerald Bowl pics
Bear__small
Emerald Bowl / End of Season Review: A microcosm of everything that is good and bad about college football fandom (with pictures!)
Jackblack_small
More Emerald Bowl Photos
Small
Recruiting Update
Follett_small
Emerald Bowl Photos!

Recent FanPosts

Small
New Cal Recruit, Mark Brazinski, C
Script_cal_small
DBD 01.04.09 & 01.05.09 Aloha Fiesta Bowl
More_cascades_small
More (mediocre) Emerald Bowl Photos
Bnavatar_small
BCS vs. Playoffs Debate
Small
Pac-10 Bowl Idea
Bnavatar_small
DBD 1.02.08 Cotton Bowl Open Thread
Follett_small
DBD 1.01.2009: Tedford signs contract extension!
Rated-r_small
Cal to Land Five-Star Wide Receiver Recruit?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

The FanPost Hall of Fame

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Emerald Bowl Highlights

Recent FanShots

Womens BB vs St. Mary's Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Torrent
Cal vs Portland Basketball Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Pep Rally Pictures and Videos and more
Thanks to Okaydo from BI with the tip.
Isi Sofele HS Highlights
Marshawn Lynch vs Jets
Huskies poached our Offensive Line Coach

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

P4572527reg_small yellow fever

ad

Site Meter