Cal Coaches Tour 5.19.08
The California Golden Blogs West Coast Office got together with 450 other Cal fans to hear Sandy, Mike, and Jeff speak on Monday night. TwistNHook provided the pink plastic sunglasses, Ragnarok and HydroTech provided the ladies, and I provided the...pen. Exactly one of us remembered to bring a writing utensil. Yes, we've got a pretty good handle on this blogging thing, thank you very much.
If you live in the east bay and weren't able to make it, you missed out. Two hours of candid talk from our three highest profile Athletic Department employees and barbecue buffet, all for FREE? Are you kidding me?? Twenty-five bucks for chicken skewers doesn't seem like such a great deal any more. What did you guys think?

TwistNHook: I was stunned by how hilarious Monty was. He must have had Bill Simmons writing for him. Or, at the very least, somebody funny! The best part was when he expressed incredulousness over how tight those bags of airline peanuts are. Who are they trying to keep out of those things, he rhetorically asked to nobody in particular. He later implored us to remember our wait staff when making tips.
Ragnarok: Yeah, at least in this setting, Mike Montgomery is a hard guy not to like. He was both funny and candid, and even a little self-deprecating (when asked to pick his favorite number between 151 and 300 for a prize drawing, he distracted everyone with a joke and then came back with 140. When told that his number was, in fact, not between 151 and 300, he responded, "Hey, I didn't go to Stanford. I just worked there.").
He also demonstrated the sort of qualities you absolutely love in a coach, the sort of guy who gets and supports the notion of student-athletes. You know he's a winner, but you just can't see him taking on an O.J. Mayo sort of player. For instance, when asked about recruiting, he said that he was recruiting players for 3 years. If, after 2 years, the guy is a certain lottery pick, then perhaps he should chase the NBA. If after 3 years, the guy looks like guaranteed to get in the first round, he should go. He wants players that want to go to school and are willing to give it at least 3 years, but he understands and supports players that have a real opportunity to make their NBA dreams happen. Indeed, he acknowledged the fact that players who stay 4 years are often perceived as 'not good enough' because they didn't leave early, and he knows this factors into a kid's decision. Still, he wants to field an experienced team, and he cited WSU's recent success as an example of "players who were not better, but they played better together".
Overall, you got a sense that the basketball program will continue Ben Braun's pattern of 'winning the right way', only with a bit more winning sprinkled in.
TwistNHook: Yeah, my favorite part was the preview video for Monty. It spliced Cal b-ball with Monty's coaching record. So, you'd see Devon dunking the ball with the caption "25 winning seasons in 26 years" and "10 straight tournament appearances." That's funny, because I don't remember Cal makes 10 straight tournament appearances. Ben Braun must be rolling over in his grave!
CBKWit: I really liked how brutally honest he is. Braun was roundabout and talked in clichés; Monty, on the other hand, never minced words and said that the one & done rule is "just awful," when asked about it. It was refreshing to hear a coach tell you, honestly, what he felt.
HydroTech: I'm not much of a basketball guy, but after seeing the charisma and energy of Montgomery, I can't help but feel excited for Cal Basketball next year. If I wasn't in grad. school and only had a job, I'd even buy season tickets.
Ragnarok: Yeah, the enthusiasm at an event like this is really inspiring. It sure gets the blue and gold blood pumping, something that's pretty rare in May.
But then before the Q+A session even started, Coach Tedford made a point of addressing the crowd regarding the controversy. He *knew* that'd be one of the first questions and wanted to cut it off at the pass. He spoke eloquently about how hard Nate worked to succeed last year. He spoke about the problem of having two great QBs on the team. He spoke of the need to support any and all Cal QBs. The controversy last year was so incredibly bitter, it's unfortunate. He spoke of moving forward as a fan-base from it.
Also, it was interesting how he said Alex Mack was his biggest recruit this year. It's true, Mack had a lot of money sitting on the NFL table for him. To turn that down to return to Cal shows an impressive level of maturity and previous financial planning. Hope it works out well for him!
When you see him in interviews or on the sidelines, he always seems 100%
business. So serious.
But in the few opportunities I've had to speak to him personally, he always seems so relaxed. Last time at the Cal FanFest he laughed when I told him how I spent the Holmoe years continuously in the fetal position.
This time I managed to get him to mock me to my face. Truly a crowning achievement. After the event, CBKWit and I went up to snap a photo with him. The people in front of us seemed all rich and powerful with their suits and male pattern baldness. Being young and poor and be-haired, I had the following exchange with Tedford (CBKWit's portion of the transcript has been redacted due to irrelevancy):
TwistNHook: "Sorry, coach, we haven't met you before because we aren't rich and powerful."
Tedford: "Why aren't you guys rich and powerful."
TwistNHook: "We're just out of college."
Tedford: "Oh. What are you guys up to?"
TwistNHook: "I'm an attorney. (AND THIS IS WHERE IT GETS MODERATELY INSANE!) I just tried to evict two people this morning."
Tedford: "Were they tree-sitters??"
TwistNHook: "No, one was a grandmother.....and the other was also a grandmother." (True story!.....kind of)
Tedford: "Wow! What a guy" (BUT SARCASTICALLY!!! HE WAS BEING SARCASTIC!)
TwistNHook: "Yeah, I'm kind of an asshole." /slinks away
know why I started rambling about my work. I looked Tedford in the eyes, I felt starstruck. This is what it must be to stand next to the Pope!

CBKWit: I was also struck by how relaxed he was, rather how relaxed all of them were, especially considering the circumstances. People have more doubts about Tedford's coaching abilities and our program than at any point during his tenure. Montgomery is faced with the serious possibility of losing his best player (Ryan Anderson, to the draft) before he gets to coach a game. Sandy has a verdict coming up on project (The Stadium Athlete High Performance Center/Stadium renovation, of course) that, for better or worse, will define her legacy at Cal.
I spoke with Sandy after the event, and while it wouldn't be prudent (oh, for the days of the 1st George Bush) to disclose exactly what she said, let's just say that she is very confident about the outcome of the stadium lawsuit. And while losing Ryan Anderson would hurt (Montgomery mentioned that one of the reasons he took the Cal job was that he wanted a chance to coach our players, particularly Ryan Anderson), Montgomery hit the nail on the head when he said "you can tell we haven't lost any games yet". There's a lot of excitement surrounding the revitalized basketball program without any disappointment, (yet). As for Tedford? Well, I saw him speak in February and he looks far more relaxed now. He has spoken glowingly, as he did last night, about last years recruiting class (headlined by Best, most redshirted last fall), repeatedly calling them the "best" class he's had at Cal. Maybe he knows just how good they are, and he's more confident in our team's chances this year than most "experts" are predicting.
He later let on a bit about his coaching style during games. Basketball commentators, he said, like to point out little strategy items that coaches should implement during timeouts, like putting in shooters to bust a zone, or reminding players to guard opposing stars. "It's like, duh. We know these things, and the kids know these things. We're not teaching them these things late in the year. We start teaching them during the pre-season, and we really want to teach them to think, so they can react properly during games." Funny and smart. Mike Montgomery is dreamy :)
0 recs |
18
comments
Read Related
Comments
Guys, thanks for the recap
Great stuff.
Did any of you get any sense from Monty about Anderson at all? Did he say whether he’s keeping in close touch with him?
What about Best? Is he expected to be ready for the season opener? Or is he a question mark for that, as far away as it is?
Can any of you elaborate on Tedford’s comments that the QB controversy was bitter? Bitter for who? Teammates? Fans? Media? For him because he realized Longshore sucks?
Also, how much $ is involved in becoming a Bear Backer? And are there any benefits like free passes to your local strip club?
by oaktownmario on May 20, 2008 11:41 PM PDT 0 recs
Oaktownmario, I don’t think there is a minimum donation to become a BearBacker. They just want your money. I gave $40. As soon as I chop my car and rob the nearest bank, I intend on donating another 5k or so.
by HydroTech on
May 21, 2008 1:31 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I should clarify
I was saying the QB controversy was bitter. And that while many fans seem to take sides, he spoke of moving forward as a team and supporting the Cal QB no matter what. I didn’t make that very clear in the paragraph above.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
May 21, 2008 7:20 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Bear Backing
I love the double entendres. I’m trying to find out how to be a Bear Backer, actually, but there isn’t a whole lot of info on the benefits at each donation level. HMMM
I'm still wondering why the Nets didn't draft Leon Powe.
by yellow fever on
May 21, 2008 9:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Giving levels
Giving levels can be found at: http://calbears.cstv.com/bear-backers/benefits.html#levels. Look under Give to Cal. Then go to Donor seating and benefits. Sorry can’t hyperlink.
by aliikai on
May 21, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Best
All indications are that he’ll be ready to go. I seem to recall that Tedford put best at about 95% currently. Honestly, I wouldn’t worry about it—he’ll be out there.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on
May 21, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
up
0 recs
nice info
Thanks for sharing.
I’d wager Westwood would kill to have a similar QB controversy, those chumps
are having to decide between bad and worse.
by Itchy25 on May 20, 2008 11:59 PM PDT 0 recs
California Ocarina of Time Athletics?
I used to be RR at the Cal Golden Blogs
by royrules22 on
May 21, 2008 1:26 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Another Move?
What? Are the A’s now planning on building their new stadium in Hyrule?
And, more importantly, will there be BART station nearby?
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on
May 21, 2008 10:06 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I think a better question
Would be what ISN’T Cal OOT AL????
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
May 21, 2008 7:18 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Stadium
Ok, so you don’t want to tell exactly what Sandy said about the stadium lawsuit, can you at least tell us when we’re likely to hear something from the judge??
This has been going on for an eternity, and we need good news to boost recruiting, keep Tedford and rebuild momentum heading into the season!
by OskiMonsta on May 21, 2008 9:49 AM PDT 0 recs
No one knows
All Sandy said with regards to this was that Judge Miller has until June 18th (I’m pretty sure that was the date) to rule. Obviously she’s not happy about the continued delays, but if she knows anything more about when a ruling will come down, she wasn’t letting on.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on
May 21, 2008 10:03 AM PDT
up
0 recs
It would be extremely unusal for Sandy
(or any of the parties) to know when exactly a ruling is coming down. There are sometimes time limits, or sometimes self-imposed deadlines (by the judge), but it is usually at the judge’s discretion as to when to issue a decision.
However, this is no easy decision for the judge in the sense that it is probably the highest profile decision of her career; she knows every word she writes will be analyzed to the core; there are tons of documents and all kinds of evidence to consider; and she does not want to get overturned on appeal, if there is one. Who wants to be known as the judge that fucked up this case? I am confident that the University will win just because the state of the law on this issue; i.e. the University’s role as an administrative body with considerable discretion in their efforts to build facilities. However, that does not make the decision an easy one to write.
by oaktownmario on
May 21, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No daily link post today?
Wife/work/life must have gotten in the way. Too bad, because I totally had a sweet link to throw down:

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
May 21, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, June 18th is the limit (3 months after last hearing) but she also said she would make a serious effort to provide a ruling earlier. Oh well, it’s been years, what’s another month at this point? Especially if we get the news we want.
I also read elsewhere that there might be some “back-channel’ negotiations between Cal and COB on a settlement – heard anything about that?
by OskiMonsta on
May 22, 2008 3:13 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I also heard of rumors that there was settlement talk going on, but I’m not sure if that’s true or not.
by HydroTech on
May 22, 2008 3:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
CBKWit posts:
“Mike Montgomery is dreamy :)”
Who’s the star struck one now? Get off my case already! :P
- Proud Bear Backer. Pay up everyone!
by OskiWeeWee on Jun 14, 2008 1:33 AM PDT 0 recs
























