DBD 11.25.08 - Cal's Bowl Possibilities
Man, I sleep at the wrong times to do one of these. I'm almost always in bed before the Daily Show, and by the time I get up in the morning, someone else (Twist) has already done one of these. I'm only doing this now because I woke up in the middle of the night and couldn't get back to sleep.
Anyway, today's DBD will feature less "Gossip Girl" references and obsessing about my facial hair, and more actual information. Don't get used to it.
With the win over Stanford, Cal can now finish no lower than in a tie for 4th place in the conference, so the Bears can safely ignore the Hawai'i and Poinsettia Bowls, the latter of which will definitely be shopping for an at-large team, while the former only might be. Cal will fall no lower than the Emerald Bowl, that much I am sure of. In fact, it seems our bowl destination will hinge almost entirely on the outcome of the Civil War; if the Beavers win, Cal goes to San Diego, whereas if the Ducks win, the Bears stay home in San Francisco.
This conclusion rests on a couple of assumptions, and for a while now I've been looking for some sort of confirmation of them; tonight, I've finally found it. First, from Okanes' story on bowl possibilities:
Cal, which begins the week tied for fourth place, can't finish second, but the Bears could tie Oregon for third if Oregon State wins the conference and goes to the Rose Bowl and USC places second and is picked for a Bowl Championship Series game. In that event, the Holiday Bowl would get its choice between the Bears and Ducks.
Holiday Bowl executive director Bruce Binkowski said Monday that Cal likely would get the bid because it won the head-to-head matchup against Oregon.
"Historically, what we do in the case of a tie is look at who had the edge head-to-head," Binkowski said. "It's pretty difficult to not take the team that won."
When asked if there was any reason to believe the Holiday Bowl would change that criteria this season, Binkowski said: "No. It's the right thing to do."
Secondly, I wondered if, should the Ducks win and the Bears finish all alone in 4th, whether the Emerald Bowl could reach up from their 5th place selection spot and snap the Bears. Well, they can, and based on everything I've heard, they almost certainly would. From the Emerald Bowl's Executive Director:
Q: What are the tiebreakers used to figure out which Pac-10 team goes to which bowl?
Example - two teams have the same record for 4th in the Pac-10. Is it simply head to head? If more than two teams--say three teams--are tied for 4th, what determines who goes to the Emerald Bowl?
Thanks,
Derek
A: Thanks for the question, Derek. The Pacific-10 Conference has a very elaborate tie-breaker formula for the conference championship, but when there are ties for other spots in the conference standings, there are no tie-breaker procedures in place and the bowl partners have flexibility in making their selections.
This year, the Pac-10 bowl lineup is as follows:
No. 1 - Rose
No. 2 - Holiday
No. 3 - Sun
No. 4/5 - Las Vegas
No. 4/5 - Emerald
No. 6 - Hawaii
No. 7 - Poinsettia
If two teams are tied for second place, the Holiday can take either of the tied teams, and so on. Our case is unique in that the Emerald Bowl shares No. 4 and 5 with the Las Vegas Bowl. Each year, one of us has "priority." Las Vegas has the priority this year; we had it last year and will have it again in '09.
So, to use your example, if two or more teams are tied for fourth in the league this year, there is no tie-breaker procedure to determine who goes where. We will consult with the Las Vegas Bowl and hopefully decide which team is the best fit for each bowl. If we want the same team, Las Vegas will get the first pick and we will take the other team (or, in the case of a three-way tie, whichever of the teams remain).
There are a couple of other wrinkles in the Pac-10 bowl arrangements. The Sun Bowl, at No. 3, can exercise a "no repeat" clause and bypass the third place team. This happened last year when the Sun passed on Oregon State and we were fortunate enough to be able to select the Beavers.
And if there is one team in fourth place and one or more teams in fifth, either Las Vegas or Emerald can choose a fifth place team, but then the other bowl must take the fourth place team. In other words, the two bowls cannot choose two teams tied for fifth and leave No. 4 behind.
So, really, it's pretty simple, and it pretty much all comes down to the Civil War, Saturday at 4PM. However, neither the Sun nor the Las Vegas Bowls are completely eliminated. Here are a couple highly unlikely scenarios that land the Bears in either Bowl:
Sun - Oregon State beats Oregon, but USC loses one of its last two games, fails to earn an at-large BCS bid, and goes to the Holiday Bowl instead. The Bears are tied with Oregon for third, and since the Ducks went to El Paso last year, the Sun Bowl selects the Bears.
Las Vegas - USC and Oregon State win out, but the Bears lose to Washington, and Arizona State fails to win out and become bowl-eligible. With 2 teams in the BCS but only 5 bowl-eligible teams, only the Holiday, Sun, and Las Vegas Bowls get Pac-10 teams this year, and the Bears end up in a 4th-place tie with Arizona. The Sun Bowl takes the Wildcats, and the Vegas Bowl takes the only Pac-10 team left, the Bears.
Neither of these scenarios are likely (UW will be heavy underdogs against the Bears, as will both Notre Dame and UCLA vs. USC), and I very much doubt either will happen, but they're worth being aware of. Anyway, here's a few more linky-links:
Men's Basketball destroys North Carolina A&T:
Jerome Randle scored 20 points and Omondi Amoke added 11 points and four rebounds off the bench to lead California to an 82-47 win over North Carolina A&T on Monday night.
Patrick Christopher had 10 points and Jamal Boykin had nine points and seven rebounds for the Bears, who committed only nine turnovers while remaining unbeaten under first-year coach Mike Montgomery. Cal (4-0) had 12 different players score, led by as much as 37 and dominated on both ends of the floor while registering its most lopsided win since beating Long Beach State 102-65 on Dec. 28, 2007.
Robert Johnson had 14 points and six rebounds for North Carolina A&T (2-3). Unlike on Saturday when they gave UNLV a scare before losing 71-58, the Aggies weren't much of a threat and trailed nearly the entire game while shooting 33.3 percent from the floor.
The Bears, on the other hand, went into the game ranked second in the country in shooting percentage, a good portion of that due to Randle, who did nothing to hurt his numbers against the Aggies.
Also re: MBB, the article from the Chron:
Cal is four games into the tenure of coach Mike Montgomery, and about the only thing we know for sure about the Bears is that the starters are good cheerleaders.
Cal's starting five were once again in towel-waving mode for the final 7 1/2 minutes of Monday night's 82-47 blowout of North Carolina A&T at Haas Pavilion. They joined the crowd of 6,689 in cheering the three blocks of redshirt freshman center Max Zhang in garbage time.
"The games we've won are games we should have won," Montgomery said. "That's not to say that those teams couldn't beat us, but I would expect us to win."
And from the Cal Bears Examiner:
Montgomery has been preaching defense since before the start of the season and his team seems to be responding. NC A&T came into the game averaging nearly 40 rebounds, five blocks, and 10 steals per game, but weren't able to come close to that level of play at Haas Pavilion. It was Cal that looked like the defensive team while grabbing 38 rebounds, six steals, five blocked shots, and forced 19 turnovers. NC A&T was able to get 28 rebounds, but only one steal and four blocks, well below their season average.
For the game, Cal held the Aggies to 33.3% shooting (19-57) and only 11.8% from beyond the three-point line (2-17). Jamal Boykin led the Bears with seven rebounds and Jordan Wilkes (2 blocks) combined with Max Zhang (3 blocks) for all of the Bears' shot-blocking.
OK, that's it for my first attempt at a DBD. How did I do? At least better than HydroTech? Wait, wait, don't tell me, I don't want to know. I'm much to insecure to handle that kind of information. Just bring me some more links. Freshmen, more links!
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
0 recs |
198 comments
Comments
Hopefully this puts an end to the “Cal in the Las Vegas Bowl” lobbying.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 2:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I still don't see the problem with this...
What is wrong with the Vegas Bowl lobbying?
And, with this arrangement with the Emerald Bowl, are we ever likely to go there again?
by slims on Nov 25, 2008 5:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It would be pretty funny to see USC vs. Texas in the Holiday Bowl...
…such a “marquee” matchup (and i use the term loosely) in what both teams would consider a less-than stellar bowl… ha!
Obviously, the best case scenario is that we go ot the Holiday Bowl (again), hopefully against a team we can beat :)
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
by BearStage on Nov 25, 2008 2:22 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Should Oregon State win the Civil War, I for one am like totes stoked to see if Oregon State can only lose by 30 to Penn State.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 2:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If it’s Oregon State vs Penn State: Rose Bowl line will be around Penn State -6.5
If it’s USC vs Penn State: Rose Bowl line will be around USC -13.5
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 3:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s interesting. I would have thought the line for USC/PSU would have been closer than OSU/PSU.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 3:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not after USC’s demolition of Ohio State.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 3:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or their last two demolitions in the Rose Bowl.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 4:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
FanPost of the Year
http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/11/24/669591/rickey
anyone who enjoys baseball will enjoy 67Marquez’s FanPost…he even has scanned in newspaper clippings!
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 5:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That was EPIC!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 7:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
VBall to take on Oregons:
The No. 7-ranked California volleyball team heads to the Beaver State to close out the regular season with matches sandwiching the Thanksgiving holiday against Oregon State (Nov. 26) and No. 8 Oregon (Nov. 28). The Golden Bears hope to finish strong after nabbing two big wins against No. 10 UCLA and No. 11 USC at home this weekend. The last time Cal tangled with the Ducks and the Beavers in Berkeley, the Bears made short work of their opponents by claiming two 3-0 sweeps to open Pac-10 play. Now on the other end of the conference schedule, Cal has already tied the previous school record for most conference wins in a season with 12. The Bears reached the 12-win mark just three other times in school history; most recently as last season, and in 2003 prior to that. Cal also won 12 conference matches in 1982 under the direction of Chris Stanley when the Bears went 12-2 to secure the first NorPac conference championship; Cal’s only volleyball conference title. Since enduring a short losing slide, the Bears have bounced back to win three of their last four matches entering the weekend.
THE FACTS: No. 7 Cal (22-5, 12-4 Pac-10) completes the regular season with two road matches in the Beaver State. The Bears will meet Oregon State (14-15, 3-13 Pac-10) in a 4:30 p.m. PT match on Wednesday, Nov. 26 at Gill Coliseum in Corvallis, Ore. and then travel up the interstate to take on No. 8 Oregon (22-7, 10-6 Pac-10) in a 7 p.m. match on Friday, Nov. 28 at McArthur Court in Eugene, Ore. Live statistics are available for each match via links at www.goducks.com and www.osubeavers.com.
NCAA TOURNAMENT SELECTION SHOW: ESPNU will air the 2008 NCAA Division I Women’s Volleyball Championship selection show live at 7 p.m. PT on Sunday, Nov. 30. The NCAA will announce the field of 64 teams selected to participate in this year’s national championship tournament and reveal the 16 first and second round competition sites. Please check your local listings for times and availability.
Mens soccer to take on UCSB in NCAA Tourney:
This Week
The No. 9 California men’s soccer team increased its winning streak to four as it heads to Santa Barbara for the second round of the NCAA Tournament. The Golden Bears (11-3-5, 5-2-3 Pac-10) will play at No. 19 UCSB on Tuesday, Nov. 25, at 7 p.m. at Harder Stadium. Cal is fresh off a convincing 3-0 victory against San Francisco last Friday at Edwards Stadium.
In the Rankings
The Bears are currently ranked No. 9 in the Soccer Times, No. 11 in the College Soccer News NSCAA polls, and No. 12 in the Soccer America rankings.
At the end of the regular season, junior keeper Stefan Frei led the Pac-10 in goals-against average (0.68) save percentage (.829) and shutouts with eight.
Cal, as a team, led the conference in goals-against average (0.68), goals allowed (13), and shutouts with nine.
Scouting the Opposition
UC Santa Barbara (10-6-5) has not been in the win column since beating Cal State Northridge, 3-1, on Oct. 29. Since that victory, the Gauchos have gone 0-2-3. In its last game, UCSB fell to UC Irvine, 4-2 in the Big West Championship match. Despite not getting the automatic bid, the Gauchos advanced to their seventh consecutive NCAA College Cup and earned a first-round bye in the process.
Chris Pontius leads UCSB with 32 points on 14 goals.
Postseason History Against UC Santa Barbara
Although they have not met in the postseason for a few years, Cal and UCSB have met twice before in the NCAA College Cup. The Bears topped the Gauchos in 2002, 2-1, in Berkeley. It was a historic victory for Cal as it was the program’s first-ever postseason victory and it was also Kevin Grimes’ first postseason win at Cal.
In 2003, UCSB got revenge when it ousted the Bears in Santa Barbara. The Gauchos shut out Cal, 2-0.
Men’s swimming gets 5 new recruits:
BERKELEY – California signed five talented swimmers to National Letters of Intent, Golden Bears head coach David Durden announced on Monday. The signees include second-generation Bears Chris Packer and Nick Trowbridge, whose father, Todd, won an NCAA title as part of Cal’s triumphant 800-yard freestyle relay in 1982, and Tom Shields, who competed in the 2008 U.S. Olympic Trials, Austin Brown and Ben Hinshaw.
The five will join Cal next year to work with Durden and his staff, which includes assistant coach Greg Meehan, head coach emeritus Nort Thornton and strength and conditioning coach Nick Folker.
“We are very pleased to have Austin, Ben, Chris, Tom and Nick join our team for next year,” Durden said. “Greg, Nick, Nort and myself are excited to have the opportunity to work with such quality young men. We are thankful for all of the California club and high school coaches that have impacted and developed these young men into the athletes and people they are today. As these young men leave their legacy on high school swimming in the state of California this year, we are excited that they are continuing to impact California swimming through their performances as Cal Bears!”
As I reported yesterday, Mens XC got 22nd at Nationals:
The No. 18 California men’s cross country team took 22nd place with 477 points at the NCAA Championships hosted by Indiana State University Monday at the Wabash Valley Family Sports Center. Cal finished fourth among Pac-10 schools, as Oregon won the national title.
“We’re disappointed that we didn’t do better than we did last year,” said Cal head coach Tony Sandoval. “We ran so hard at regionals that we weren’t able to come back after that. We still have one of the better distance programs in the country and we’re very proud of that.”
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 7:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
VOTE FOR ALEX MACK
http://www.seniorclassaward.com/vote/ncaa_football_2009/
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 8:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Prof Romer to become key financial advisor:
Economists across the political spectrum cheered the selection of UC Berkeley Professor Christina Romer to head the Council of Economic Advisers as president-elect Barack Obama moved Monday to name his key financial counselors.
Cal defeated then-No. 3 Rutgers on Friday at Haas Pavilion. Rutgers then lost by 34 at Stanford on Sunday. So while Cal rose four spots to No. 3 and Stanford rose three places to No. 5, the Scarlet Knights fell to 13th.
Not sure we talked about this…but Cal Poly nearly beat Wisconsin at Camp Randle!
Wilner thinks the difference in the Big Game was “control of emotions.”
Erase all the turnovers and dumb penalties, and Stanford would have been right there until the end …
Obviously, you can’t erase them, and you shouldn’t. Not only are mistakes part of football, they’re a large part of rivalry games. Which brings me to today’s topic:
Managing emotions.
That’s where Cal won the game. The difference wasn’t Jahvid Best or Cal’s defense. The difference was the mistakes Stanford made and the mistakes Cal didn’t make.
Avoiding mistakes is as advantageous (and important) as making them is detrimental.
The Bears kept their emotions in check and, with the exception of one awful pass, didn’t force anything and didn’t let emotion get the best of them.
I think he’s bitter that Cal smoked his pick…Wilner also put Central Michigan in his Top 25…
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 8:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
My wife, who majored in econ, saw the Romer pick on CNN last night and got really excited! Robert Reich was on there and he had the Campanile in the background. Go Bears!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 8:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't the Romer also have Clinton Administration experience?
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 8:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who cares? As long as she has Cal experience, I’m happy!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 8:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I took classes with her. She was a good professor.
I, however, want me econ 133 professor to become an advisor on the Bobby Jindal administration.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 8:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Damnit, give me edit capabilities. Now I sound like a pirate.
Damn you, Twist, damn you.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, your stupidity is, in every way, my fault.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And I never blame you for my typos
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly, it’s because everything is your fault.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mrs. TwistNHook, is that you?
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We should plan on going to the Cal-‘furd women’s hoops game. Should be awesome to see (potentially) two top 5 teams play.
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 8:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely want to make it out for that. Whats the date?
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 8:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
MARK JANUARY 18, 2009 ON YOUR CALENDAR, PEOPLE!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I always mark January 18 on my calendar...
…since that’s my birthday
by calgbear on Nov 25, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully, Cal women’s basketball gives you a win over Stanford as a bday present!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 10:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rags, perhaps you can help me understand the Big XII pecking order when it comes to bowls?
So assuming there isn’t anymore chaos, Oklahoma goes to the NC Game, and say Texas snatches up an at-large bid. Obviously, that leaves behind an 11-1 Texas Tech team. There’s also a 9-3 Oklahoma State team and a 10-3 Missouri team (loser of Big XII Championship game).
It seems in the past two years, the loser of the Big XII CG picks up the Cotton Bowl bid (Missouri last year, Nebraska two years ago), so does Missouri get the Cotton Bowl or does Texas Tech (by virtue of Texas Tech simply just having a better record)? Next in the pecking order is the Holiday bowl, then the Gator Bowl (usually), then the Alamo Bowl.
So if Texas Tech gets the Cotton Bowl, would Oklahoma State or Mizzou get the Holiday bowl? One team is 9-3, the other is 10-3, but head-to-head, Oklahoma State beat Missouri.
Then, there’s talk that if Nebraska wins against Colorado, they’d get a Gator Bowl bid (ahead of Missouri, mind you). I understand that Big XII #3 means third-pick, not third place, but would the Gator Bowl pick a significantly worse Nebraska team over a better Missouri team because Nebraska “travels better”?
I’m usually good at sorting out all the bowl nonsense, but I am still confused. Please help.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 8:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Godddamn, your post hurts my brain!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 8:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would think the Cotton Bowl gets the first non-BCS pick
and it would select Texas Tech with the media attention, Heisman candidates, and 1-loss record. Missouri would be selected for the Holiday (media attention for Chase Daniel Jeremy Maclin >> Zac Robinson/Dez Bryant) because they have 10 wins and were in that title game. I think every non-BCS bowl would be chomping at the bit for Texas Tech
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 8:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
plus the cotton bowl's in texas...
and Cal would match up better with Mizzou!
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 8:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
See, that's the thing...
Yes, the order of the picks is Cotton, then Holiday, then Gator, then Alamo.
But even though every single author assumes the same things (Texas and TTU win out, Oklahoma makes the Big XII CG, Oklahoma beats Oklahoma State and Missouri and plays the winner of Alabama-Florida in the NCG), they all have different projections for these four bowls and which four teams out of TTU, Mizzou, Ok State, and Nebraska make which bowls.
I’ll ignore Stewart Mendel since he thinks Cal makes the Sun Bowl even though he has Oregon State making the Rose Bowl (which Rags has clearly proven really won’t happen). But even other writers get the bowl bids completely different.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 8:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that's the problem with projecting Big XII team into bowls
In that, beyond the conference tie-ins, there really is no definite order for these bowls to select their teams. The Cotton will pick whichever team it feels will be the best draw, and the Holiday will do the same.
Want more confusion? The Gator Bowl doesn’t even have to select a Big XII team! They could instead select a Big East team, or Notre Dame (though with the Irish limping to the finish line at 6-6, I somehow don’t see that happening. If the Gator does select a Big East team or Notre Dame, the Sun Bowl would get to pick a Big XII team, but only after the Alamo Bowl. Otherwise, the Sun would get to select either a Big East team, or Notre Dame. Yeah, the Sun could conceivably end up with 6-6 Arizona vs. 6-6 Notre Dame.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on Nov 25, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Nebraska gets picked over Missouri for the Gator Bowl, then heads should and will roll.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
glenn dickey's funny
http://www.sfexaminer.com/sports/Dickey_Convincing_Big_Game_win_will_only_brighten_Cals_future.html
Cal alums often write me to say they can’t understand why players aren’t attracted to Cal because of the school’s academic stature, its beautiful campus and its location in an area which visitors and residents love — which only proves that they are not 18-year-old males.
Top prep prospects are looking for a school which: (1) Has a team that will showcase their talents for the NFL; (2) Has a lot of attractive (they’d say hot) female students; and (3) Has good beaches nearby, at which the young women in question will be in bikinis. USC is at the top of the charts in all categories. Cal ranks fairly high in the first two categories but is virtually shut out in the third.
For those who don’t know him, he’s a columnist for the examiner now after a long tenure with the Chronicle where he thought the niners destiny was ending ever since 1990. He’s a HUGE cal homer and most definitely an Old Blue. He was a student when Pappy was the coach…he sort of looks like father time but without the mustache (yes, he rocks this look with a beard and no stache).
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 9:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
(2) Has a lot of attractive (they’d say hot) female students; and (3) Has good beaches nearby, at which the young women in question will be in bikinis.
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The female population has gotten more attractive in recent years
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 9:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or you just like them younger. PedOski.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Look at the women on an average Cal Gameday.
Then do the same thing at a Florida State-Alabama game.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
or ASU-UCLA...
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 9:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t imagine what the parties at those schools are like.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 9:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
female twins dressed up as Bear Bryant
These are relatively low on the NSFW Alert scale
http://ymswwc.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/closeupled.jpg
not sure if these are the same girls…
http://blog.collegebars.net/uploads/hottest-student-bodies/alabamafront.jpg
For a Power Rankings list of attractive women at academic institutions (NSFW), visit:
http://blog.collegebars.net/hottest-student-bodies-part-4/
They have 4 or 5 sets of rankings…Cal made the list at 14…
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 11:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cal’s only 14 because of Allison Stokke. Otherwise they don’t crack top 40.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Comment on the Buffalo Bill's blog
Just use it as an opportunity to say things about Marshawn Lynch.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 9:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Our Holiday Bowl hopes are slightly dimmer now that Jacquizz Rodgers will most likely not play in this weekend’s Civil War.
(☞゚∀゚)☞
by Berkelium97 on Nov 25, 2008 11:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
FLYSWEEPS4ALL!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 11:27 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Run it every play until they stop it
then fake it with a reverse.
Insta-Touchdown
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I say they should just run the Hook and Ladder every play!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
with the occasional flea flicker
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They still have McCants, Stroughter, Morales and the other Rodgers. I think they can do it. It’ll be all about controlling the ball.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 11:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They beat Arizona, on the road, without Moaefahweo and Quizz. At home, against Oregon, they’ll still have a solid chance.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And they’ve gotten totalled the last two times they’ve played in Corvallis. Should be closer this time because Oregon State will probably play it tight, but Riley generally has had the advantage over Bellotti.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 12:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is horrible news

During the civil war… the teams are more equalized than normal… plus the records don’t matter… What I’m saying is this game is usually a push going in plus 3-4pts for home field advantage. (home team usually wins)
However, without Quiz there probably going to be in the hole about 6pts. I think Cantfield is not a problem… but without Quiz, this thing is a coin flip…
I don’t like having or Holiday Bowl chances decided by a coin flip.
Plus… I think the Beavs should have lost at Arizona… they got away with one there. Quiz has alot to do with controlling the ball/clock for them.
by danzig on Nov 25, 2008 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. I'm thinking Oregon will get payback for last year's game
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 6:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In the Pac10 this year, home field advantage has been HUGE! How many road teams have won this year? Even USC has a road loss and struggled on the road against Arizona. So, yes, OSU not having Quizz will suck. But being in Corvallis is even bigger advantage.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Home field has been a magic wand this year, no doubt…. but knowing they won’t have the Quiz… and an Xfactor at QB… and only a slim 3-4pt home-field-betting-advantage……what NET handicap could I assign to the ORST ?
I watched the video of ORE @ AZST… the ducks were a quick strike team… they have the potential to perform on the road (tho AZST sucks ass).
I’d say ORST is a +3pt dog to OREG at the Civil War. Really. With an over/under of 51. The Beavs almost lost to us, for pete’s sake… if not for a few special teams plays. This game is a coin flip, plus or minus a micron… and I will be sic every min of the game. (cross fingers)
by danzig on Nov 25, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When does the game start? I’ve planned a hike of Mt. Diablo for this saturday. Hopefully, I’ll miss the game. I couldn’t watch it live.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
should be nice for a hike...
I like Mt. Tam:
Park at Stinson Beach…Hike up Dipsea trail to Steep Ravine Trail…at the pan toll ranger station turn around and return to stinson. Enjoy lunch and a pint at the sand dollar cafe. It’s about 5-6 miles and a good 1500 feet in elevation change. You’ll feel it the next day or two.
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 9:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED IT!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 11:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I did Nail It. Thank you!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I see what you did there.
I make carp look like an idiot.
by Maharg on Nov 26, 2008 8:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED IT!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 11:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Another successful nailing of it. You are being quite kind!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a rivalry game, so all bets were and are off no matter who is injured.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fuck. How do I get my betback on? I had the over. Can anybody help me?
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 1:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
some news on a recruit we're trying to land
Multi-purpose athlete Adam Hall (Tucson, Ariz./Palo Verde) visited Cal last weekend and said he could definitely see himself wearing a Bears jersey.
Hall is a tremendous talent and could play multiple positions in college. Most schools like Hall as a safety or receiver, but the Bears prefer him for defense.
“They feel I could play a lot right away a safety,” Hall said. “I prefer receiver and asked if I could get a chance to start out there and they said they’re totally fine with that. I actually like both positions but I prefer receiver by just a small percentage so it’s not that big of a deal for me either way.”
Hall listed a number of things he enjoyed about the visit.
“The environment was great and I loved the game atmosphere,” Hall said. "I met a lot of the professors and really like the academic setting there. The food was incredible, I ate like crazy and honestly, I think I gained five pounds over the weekend.
“I got to hang out with my boys from Arizona, Marc Anthony and Cameron Jordan. They hosted me and I hung out with Devon Kennard a lot too and we’re pretty close as well. We have some schools in common and we’ll be taking another trip together when we visit USC and it would be cool to play with him in college.”
i'm here to clean your pool but i don't have a pool *bowchica bowow*
by ch0ster on Nov 25, 2008 12:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Kennard in a Cal uniform. That needs to happen. I do wonder about his injury though and whether that will affect his speed. None of the recruiting services seem to think so. But, I’m still surprised his ranking hasn’t fallen.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the pessmistic side in me...
believes that both of these guys are headed to south central.
i'm here to clean your pool but i don't have a pool *bowchica bowow*
by ch0ster on Nov 25, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m skeptical too, but there is definitely an opening for Cal. By attending Big Game, it showed our game atmosphere can be as good as the rest of the Pac-10. Combine that with the uniqueness of Berkeley, the food, the weather, the academics, the success in college and placing guys in the NFL, and that they have friends already on the team, Tedford can close this.
I mean, if USC was a lock, they would of committed already on the offer. Or, a guy like Randall Carroll wouldn’t be looking at Cal after already giving SC a verbal.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You mean even if you had somewhat decided which school you were going to, you wouldn’t take some extra free trips to other schools?
by MCM711 on Nov 25, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hall hasn’t committed. Kennard recommitted. Carroll is the only one that could of possibly done so, but given he is a fan of Cal, I doubt that is the case.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Was he ever committed?
I like how we stole Steve Williams from a big-time program (which always loses in the BCS game it plays yearly) by our style of play
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why couldn’t the student section get the “Dev-von Ken-nard” chant going.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 12:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because it’d show favoritism by doing that for one recruit but not for the others.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That, and there aren’t that many of us that are up on recruiting news. My gameday crew is pretty knowledgeable about foosball, and I am the only one current with recruiting.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t think we’re going to get any of them… surprisingly, kennard seems the most likely of the non-JC group that attended
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 12:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that would be my guess, but there’s no use in speculating now. we’ll probably find out soon after the SC visit.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We got DeSean didn’t we? It could happen again, and again and again!
by CaliforniaCMB on Nov 26, 2008 1:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t see how these kids can decide not to attend USC. As much as I hate $C, if I were a top recruit, I think I’d rather go there than Cal because of the greater exposure on TV, to NFL Scouts, and because of the strong alumni connection. USC just has everything going for them right now.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 12:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose the only downside to USC is that they may have too much star talent and you can sort of get lost among the mass of blue-chip players. If you go to a school like Cal, you’re more likely to stand out.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
USC has suffered from star glut the past several seasons, especially with their absurd running back platoon.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that is a very big reason. That’s why Desean migrated north. As to other top Cal recruits, most of them were local (Best and Marshawn come to mind).
I realize Cal won’t win a lot of recruiting battles with SC. However, every game for the past two years has been televised. It is a top 25 program that puts stars in the NFL that actually succeed (Marshawn, Desean, and Aaron) whereas many of the SC guys flame out. I think there are a lot of reasons a kid might prefer Cal.
The Sam McGuffie story comes to mind. The kid loved Cal. he was from Texas. he had committed to a traditional power, Michigan. But his heart said Cal.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Buh? I thought he hadn’t announced his transfer plans yet?
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
http://mgoblog.com/content/sam-mcguffie-others-leaving-team
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh wow. Hopefully cal gets in that race. He would have to sit out next year, which is fine because Jahvid and Shane got it locked down anyway.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Last year he was /this close/ to going to Cal, but from what I hear his family waned to buy a house to be near him and well, you know how Bay Area housing prices are (um, were?).
by turkey on Nov 25, 2008 1:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya seriously they could probably buy a condo in Livermore for pennies and a bag of snot right now…I hope Tedford’s on it.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Imagine if McGuffie had decided (or decides to transfer). The depth at TB would be incredible. It would also give Cal a much needed slot receiver.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, we’d have the same “problem” that USC does. Best, Vereen, Slocum, Deboskie, Yarnway, some other dude whose name I am forgetting. Why even have WRs????
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
triple option?
the old wing-T offense?
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 2:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why even have QBs???
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wildebest!
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My thought is, Jahvid may be a candidate to leave early and why not add another gamebreaker to the group. outside of Vereen, those guys aren’t burners. Also, McGuffie is a pretty good receiver too.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t disagree that having as much talent as possible is awesome!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think part of SC’s “problem” is not committing to a couple backs. Most running backs need a decent amount of carries to get going, to get a rhythm.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 2:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sam McGuffire didn’t impress me in the limited time I saw him at the beginning this year. He’s definitely not an improvement on what we have now
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Quick! Somebody send this to Tedford. He needs to know the truth!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, I’d love to have him on the team, but I’m looking forward more to what Yarnway and DeBoskie can bring for the tough yards. I could definitely see him making an impact in two years if Jahvid leaves early, but there’s a reason why he’s gone from 1st string to 3rd string this year… I’ll refrain from any jokes about LBs sneezing here
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LB sneezing jokes are my favorite KIND of sneezing-related jokes!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Then again, the chance that we could have two hurdles in one play would be exponential (Ross fumbles after hurdling a defender… McGuffie picks it up and hurdles everybody else)… We could design tricks just for this
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, there is a reason he went from 1st string to 3rd, I’m thinking he was given too much, too soon, as a true freshman. I also question pretty much everything RichRod has done since he arrived in Ann Arbor.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 3:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So, McGuffie has had three concussions this year. My question is, why do they keep putting him back in if he isn’t fully healed?
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well, one is more likely to get a concussion after sustaining one. So it’s like you’re screwed from the first one.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, I’ll refrain from making LB sneezing jokes
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah man!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED IT!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 11:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I don’t know how much I truly nailed anything here. I mean it was an OK joke. But I do appreciate the sentiment!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED TI!
It's spelled "S-h-u-h-u-s-k-y-h-a-t-e-r"
by JShufelt on Nov 27, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because football coaches are macho morons who don't understand
that “concussion” is a euphemism for “brain injury”?
Particularly given that Michigan now has douchebag extraordinaire Rich Rodriguez in charge, this doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 26, 2008 12:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s not the only downside to USC. I mean each player is going to have their own individual views on what does and does not make a good school. Yes, Cal isnt on the same level as USC football-wise. And maybe our local ladies dont focus on their physical appearance as much as those at USC. But we live in a vibrant metropolis with access to pretty much anything they want, musically, culinarily. The Bay Area has its own special draw.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 1:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know, maybe it would be more worth it for Cal to do negative recruiting. Instead of showing them the Cal campus for a weekend, show them the Cal campus for one day, then fly to LA and a) try to drive from Thousand Oaks to Anaheim on Friday at 4 pm b) tour Compton and the East LA barrios c) check out a Hollywood alley for some tranny prostitutes and heroin junkies d) drive up to Griffith Park observatory on a stagnant October afternoon and try to see more than 30 feet through the haze.
They’d jump ship for Cal in a heartbeat.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Every school has its negative aspects. Why not show those kids junkies in People’s Park, smelly people on Telegraph, empty storefronts on Shattuck and telegraph, or substandard apartments surrounding campus. They could tour the Bay View, the Tenderloin, East Oakland and maybe walk around the Macarthur BART station late at night.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We already had our own backyard negative recruiting with that whole tards in trees mess
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s just my point. Each player is going to see what they see. Just because USC is a powerhouse doesn’t mean the each player is going to love it. The Bay Area has many, many, many positives outside of the football-osity that could cause a player to come here.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but SC won’t show them that…
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it tough to mistake that $C's in the ghetto?
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 1:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, SC won’t show them the shitty areas around Berkeley. We have the advantage until other schools learn of our devious technique!
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you going to start raving about how great Palo Alto is again?
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Only if you try and pass off getting your car stolen as a fun memory.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 5:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Palo Alto sucks and stolen cars suck
Everyone happy?
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, but it’s completely unrelated to this thread.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 7:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Alright, I’ll give you your nose back. I was just joking, it was actually my thumb.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 7:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That one always gets me!
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED IT!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 11:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
flagged for nailing it.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nagged for flailing it!
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2008 2:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He flailed the SHIT out of it!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, you just nailed Hydro. That’s disturbing!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Now we know why Hydro has been happier recently and used the B& Hammer less.
I make carp look like an idiot.
by Maharg on Nov 26, 2008 8:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve never seen him use the Bampersand Hammer once!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 8:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he did say that he Cal was his favorite team growing up and that we’d play him on offense (whereas SC would put him on D). at least we made his five officials!
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s pretty big I’d think. If he wants to play WR for his favorite team, he has that opportunity. He can still play on a big stage, he can still make it to the NFL and he can get one heck of a degree in the process.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 12:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He just looks like he should be on our team too— small, speedy guy in the mold of DeSean and Jahvid, I just looked at his tape, and he’s definitely a burner. I don’t think SC will even look at him as a WR, given the guys they usually produce and put on the field.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s a good thought, that he is more in line with the prototypical Cal WR. Though, obviously Tedford moved away from that over the last two recruiting classes. I do think it is an element the current crop of WR’s at Cal lack, that is, speed along the lines of Jordan, Hawkins or Jackson.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just watched an interview from awhile ago with Carroll talking about his friendship with other SoCal recruits. He talked about how they all want to go to the same place together. those other guys he mentioned are all committed to SC… BAD
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 1:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But Tedford hugged them each and it was magical.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 1:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Guys say that all the time. But when it comes to signing that LOI, individual interest reigns supreme. So does mamma.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was an old interview too, before Cal jumped in the picture. What’s bad is that USC was the first to give him a look and an offer. Everyone else thought he was just a track guy.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like what happened to Best. When SC realized what they missed with Jahvid, they immediately offered. I also think Jahvid had a mark against him because of the small school he played at.
by BeastMode on Nov 25, 2008 1:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you miss it? It was during second quarter right after the Wave.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 1:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
uh oh
We have some schools in common and we’ll be taking another trip together when we visit USC and it would be cool to play with him in college.
Let’s hope we don’t lose them to the the evil empire…luckily, SC might not even be practicing when they go visit…
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 12:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where did you get this from? I’m looking for a good recruiting information source.
by CaliforniaCMB on Nov 26, 2008 12:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True Story
So, I play badminton. A lot. Last night I was playing in a club in Emeryville when I noticed a fairly large african american guy with all Cal gear playing on one of the courts. (I only mention his race because badminton is played 90% by asians in the US). Needless to stay he stood out. He also had a Cal Football sweatshirt.
Problem was, I didn’t recognize him, so that rules out most of the starters. I checked the sign-in sheet at the front desk. Uh-oh, I see someone named Garrett signed in, with a scribble for the first name. Or are those initials? I did not want to meet RJ Garrett (the guy who was kicked off the team for armed robbery).
So I asked to use the computer behind the front desk for a second, and google-imaged RJ Garrett. Whew, it wasn’t him. Then I noticed someone also signed in with the first name of Sean. Sean Young? I asked the cashier if someone named Sean Young had paid by credit card. Sure enough, it was him. Sweet!
Now, I am more or less the worst person when it comes to talking to sports people. I saw Steve Young in the supermarket near my house with his little kid and all I could think to say was “daaahh your kid looks a lot like you.” daaaah. And he said “yeah.” Retarded conversation, yes, but it was Steve Young. To this day the greatest moment of my life.
So I went up to Sean and asked, of course, “are you Grecian?” K not really. I basically asked what the heck he was doing playing badminton in Emeryville on a Monday night and he said some friends took him there to play for the first time. “Man, I suck,” he said. (He did, but badminton is tricky. And I’m probably equivalently terrible at football so I wasn’t one to talk smack.)
I didn’t really know what to say…he hadn’t played at all since what…La Tech? I should have asked whether he was gonna try and enter the draft and go to the combines, or talk about the sweet catch from MSU. But instead I congratulated him on the Stanford game (he probably thought I’m a dumbass fan and didn’t know that he didn’t play) and the season, and suggested he bring the rest of the team down to play. He gave me the biggest “lol yea fuckin right dude” look you’ve ever seen in your life. Damn. Jahvid Best I bet would WRECK anyone at badminton.
Either way, it was pretty cool, and definitely caught me off-guard, in a “this is the last place I expect a Cal fb player to be” kind of way. Like if I had seen Slash from Guns n Roses picking out a tea set at Bed Bath n Beyond.
And now let’s all enjoy a nice, cool glass of turnip juice.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I’d doubt RJ Garrett would be decked out in Cal gear at this point. But, I wish all Cal football players well.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 1:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He made a nice catch in the Oregon game too.
I think his brother is going to be one of the team leaders next year. Maybe defensive captain
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 1:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I play badminton too!
with 3 other co-workers! I never played until a couple of months ago…then I realized it’s the greatest co-ed game of all time! Our M/M team loses to the F/F team all the time!
The best player is a female from Thailand…she can fake like she’s hitting it hard and then lobs it over the net…her only drawback is that she’s kind of a birdie-hog.
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where do you play?
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
at the UCSF gym
we play in a raquetball court with a taped up net…probably not legal but it’s fun nonetheless. We usually play 4 or 5 times a week.
my game can be summed as follows:
I try too hard to make every shot/serve a kill shot. Naturally, I make some pretty epic kills…but I also have some pretty epic misses. I also try and hit the birdie as hard as possible which results in a few into the net, a few out of bounds and more than a few kill shots. I think I lack foot speed so I try and run less by ending the point…if I’m on I usually roll…but too often I’m not. I once bruised the chin of my co-worker with a rocket birdie shot! I’m trying to develop more of a finesse game and a more reliable serve. I usually try to serve to the extremes of the court which is in line with my all/none type of play.
Since my baseball playing days are over I’ve been yearning for a recreational team sport. Stairmaster at the gym just doesn’t cut it. I love rugby but I’m a little afraid I’m one ACL or shot to the head away from being a different person. Softball doesn’t really cut it. I suck at basketball…so that leaves the great sport of badminton! We play for an hour or two and by the end of the day and I’m soaked in sweat. It’s great excercise!
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You might try googling Bay Badminton Center in Burlingame. They have 16 nice courts (drop in is ~$7) and is my favorite gym.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 2:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...I'll have to check that out.
I was thinking of getting a new raquet…any recommendations for a beginner?
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 2:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, anything light and cheap works. Don’t be fooled, you don’t need a $200 Yonex to play well.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 2:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, I do.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
During the Olympics, one of my friends got MBC, the Mandarin Broadcasting Channel. We’d watch that to see all those sports that people in Asia love, but are unloved here. Badmiton was on the top of that list!!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah this year I was so stoked they had all the events available on nbc.com. In the past they’d air badminton at like 3 am on CNBC and have some moron like Joe Morgan announcing. Remember when Kent Brockman announced the soccer match? It was like that. So I was glad they just put up the stadium feed without retard announcers.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 25, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I liked the badminton, but I LOOOOOOOOOOOOVED the ping pong. They take it s seriously. With all these crazzy serves and stuff. Its a different view on ping pong over thre.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The webcasts were awesome for olympicphiles like me
Sports that I found oddly addictive:
Judo (seriously, it’s tense as shit— watch it)
Badminton
Sailing
Sports that I found surprisingly dull:
Team Handball
Table Tennis
Taekwondo
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 26, 2008 12:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This DBD could use more Gossip Girl references.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 2:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
my wife made me watch
dancin with the stars last night…
OMG the little mini dancers are soooo cuuttee! (repeat like 5,6 times)
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 2:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My wife took me to see Twilight after the BIg Game, does that count?
by turkey on Nov 25, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
THE BEST ARTICLE EVER!!!!
was tempted to make it a fan post without any real comment on it. Here’s hoping for some karma coming back to bite Mack Brown in the ass.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122747403752551393.html#articleTabs_comments26articleTabs3Darticle
by 33SwisherSweet on Nov 25, 2008 2:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Here’s that in clickable format and 33SS is right. I was splooging all over the place reading that.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love nothing more than to beat Texas in the Holiday Bowl this year.
by CalBandGreat on Nov 25, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That seems unlikely. I think it would require something like none of the BigXII teams making the NC game (pushing them all down a slot) but somehow also none of the big 3 BigXII teams winning the BigXII (again pushing them all down a slot). It’s so confusing!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we need OK to lose to Okie state....
Texas to either lose or win a very close game with A&M and Missouri to come through in the B12 title game against TTech. Then, what do you get? SEC champion in nc game, $c in the nc game…big12 champion (Missouri) to the fiesta, OSU-PSU for Rose, SEC #2 for sugar. then maybe the big12 #2 to sugar or orange.
delusional, but not impossible.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Nov 25, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why you always gotta shoot down my dreams? :(
In that case, I’ll do what I’ve done all my life and come up with a more realistic dream: one of these days I wanna play them and win.
by CalBandGreat on Nov 25, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I really want to put them on our OOC schedule for the future.
Hell, I want Cal to play the powers sometime – Texas, Oklahoma, Michigan, Florida, etc.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 4:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No matter who wins the Texas-Oklahoma debate, the loser will at least meet a better bowl fate than the Bears did. If either Texas or Oklahoma finishes third or fourth in the BCS, which they’re virtually assured of doing if they don’t lose again, they must receive a BCS bid.
The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.
by carp on Nov 25, 2008 3:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
GOTR:
Oklahoma State will upset Oklahoma this weekend, pushing Texas Tech to the Big XII CG.
It’s not logical. After all, Texas Tech destroyed Oklahoma State and Oklahoma dominated Texas Tech. Hence, Oklahoma State shouldn’t come close to Oklahoma, right?
But then a funny thing happened – I was reading about all the Big XII controverseis already and then I see Bob Stoops politicking for Oklahoma (then saying he’s "done"). We see this happen all the time – coaches pre-emptively complain about the BCS screwing them over, then they themselves get screwed over.
So, I’m going on the record: Oklahoma State will upset Oklahoma this weekend.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 3:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If TTU goes to the BigXII CG against Miss and loses, but Texas beats A+M, that means Texas goes to the NC even though they didnt even go to their own CG game and the team that beat them lost in it? Is that correct?
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There technically is no rule that you have to win your conference outright in order to play for the NCG game. The only rule is that you have to be ranked #1 or #2 in the final BCS rankings. HOWEVER…
The “you didn’t win your own conference” argument was used against Georgia last year (in spite of the fact that many pollsters felt that they were the hottest and best team) and against Michigan in 2006 (remember, at the time, any team that came within three of OSU was considered phenomenal). The last time two non-conference winners made it to the NCG was Nebraska in 2001 (upset by Colorado) and Oklahoma in 2003 (lost to Kansas State in the Big XII CG) and these two teams lost big in the CG and played there ahead of more deserving opponents (Oregon and USC, coincidentally two Pac 10 teams, respectively).
As a result, if TTU makes it and loses to Missouri, how are pollsters going to react? Will they say that Texas didn’t win, so they shouldn’t go to the NCG? Who then would play against the winner of Florida-Bama (assuming no upsets)? USC? The same argument could be used against them, given that, although they are Pac 10 co-champs with OSU (assuming win over Oregon), they didn’t win the Pac 10 due to tiebreakers. Penn State? Do you really want to see a Penn State team that lost to Iowa play Bama for the NCG (ooh, throwback)? Maybe give Utah a chance? Hmm, Urban Meyer against his former team for the NCG?
As you can see, this weekend will be chock full of excitement. The five games to watch most closely:
Florida v Florida State, Alabama v Auburn, Oklahoma v Ok State – all of which could affect who goes to the NCG. Root for the upset if you like BCS chaos.
Oregon v Oregon State – For the Rose Bowl bid.
Georgia Tech v Georgia – this one is really interesting only because of the triple option. Can it succeed against a big, bad SEC team? If you hate the SEC as much as I do, root for Paul Johnson and his boys.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 4:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the diff btwn Oklahoma and Nebraska and Texas this year, at least Ok and Neb made their CG games. Under our hypothetical, Texas wouldnt even win their own division, let alone conference. Similar to Georgia last year.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, Nebraska lost to Colorado in their last regular season game in TTU-Oklahoma fashion, which sent the Buffaloes to the Big XII CG where they defeat Oklahoma, yet only ended up in the Fiesta Bowl. Oregon was ranked #2 in human polls, but also only made the Fiesta Bowl (the Rose Bowl was the site of the NCG). Nebraska somehow played in the Rose Bowl against undefeated and clear #1 Miami.
This is actually one of the worst BCS controversies during the BCS’ ten years.
by Rishi on Nov 25, 2008 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was OUR turn to lose to Miami. OURS!
It's spelled "S-h-u-h-u-s-k-y-h-a-t-e-r"
by JShufelt on Nov 27, 2008 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice prediction. But I said it first. Like, while Oklahoma was crushing Harrell in the third quarter. Ragnarok will confirm this.
You lose. Unless Okie State loses. Then we both lose.
by BearsNecessity on Nov 25, 2008 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t buy it…although I like the fact that OK St. has a completely different offense, and everybody on OU’s defense is banged up.
...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box
by Thoroughbred on Nov 25, 2008 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was there. Avi called it before you did.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on Nov 25, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Witness!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 25, 2008 11:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NAILED IT!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 25, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
flagged for excessive nailing.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by HydroTech on Nov 25, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know that CBKWit, he’ll nail anything that moves!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 7:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That explains a lot about why all of the Marshawnthusiasts are so stationary.
I make carp look like an idiot.
by Maharg on Nov 26, 2008 8:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, most of us are morbidly obese.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Nov 26, 2008 8:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have another True Story involving Cal football players, and recruits.
It shall be posted in tomorrow’s DBD.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2008 2:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















