California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Inside the Numbers : Stanfurd

Well, here it goes again.  The nervous feelings.  The pit of the stomach.  A Cal fan never feels confident against Stanford.  Especially not one who came of age during the Holmoecaust.  And ESPECIALLY not one who just watched the last two Cal games.  This has been an up and down season for Cal.  Rough losses.  Big victories.  It's almost over and we (hopefully) have a soft landing at the end.  Although Stanford has clearly shown some vivacity this season.  They managed to do two things we couldn't, beat OSU and Arizona. 

And score more than 3 points against USC.  Let's take a look at the nuts and bolts of this Stanford team to see who we will be facing off against tomorrow. 

Here it goes again......

Finally, we've been posting a lot recently.  Check it: YouTube Thurday, RoundtableB-Ball Recap; Arizona analysis; Marshawn v. Browns; Top25; Bowl Scenarios; OSU Thoughts; Pete Newell Memories; Big Game Memories

Star-divide

 

All numbers are from here.

 

TEAM STATISTICS  STAN  OPP 
SCORING  299  292 
   Points Per Game  27.2  26.5 
FIRST DOWNS  202  238 
   Rushing  111  87 
   Passing  72  127 
   Penalty  19  24 
RUSHING YARDAGE  2272  1548 
   Yards gained rushing  2577  1920 
   Yards lost rushing  305  372 
   Rushing Attempts  453  389 
   Average Per Rush  5.0  4.0 
   Average Per Game  206.5  140.7 
   TDs Rushing  25  18 
PASSING YARDAGE  1514  2619 
   Att-Comp-Int  248-139-12  374-236-6 
   Average Per Pass  6.1  7.0 
   Average Per Catch  10.9  11.1 
   Average Per Game  137.6  238.1 
   TDs Passing  10  15 
TOTAL OFFENSE  3786  4167 
   Total Plays  701  763 
   Average Per Play  5.4  5.5 
   Average Per Game  344.2  378.8 
KICK RETURNS: #-Yards  52-1172  57-1198 
PUNT RETURNS: #-Yards  21-222  13-71 
INT RETURNS: #-Yards  6-102  12-119 
KICK RETURN AVERAGE  22.5  21.0 
PUNT RETURN AVERAGE  10.6  5.5 
INT RETURN AVERAGE  17.0  9.9 
FUMBLES-LOST  23-9  29-14 
PENALTIES-Yards  76-689  80-684 
   Average Per Game  62.6  62.2 
PUNTS-Yards  49-1980  47-1789 
   Average Per Punt  40.4  38.1 
   Net punt average  38.1  31.6 
TIME OF POSSESSION/Game  29:35  30:25 
3RD-DOWN Conversions  53/137  65/149 
   3rd-Down Pct  39%  44% 
4TH-DOWN Conversions  7/12  6/10 
   4th-Down Pct  58%  60% 
SACKS BY-Yards  33-237  17-118 
MISC YARDS  -20 
TOUCHDOWNS SCORED  37  35 
FIELD GOALS-ATTEMPTS  13-15  15-19 
ON-SIDE KICKS  0-0  0-0 
RED-ZONE SCORES  37-39 95%  40-50 80% 
RED-ZONE TOUCHDOWNS  30-39 77%  25-50 50% 
PAT-ATTEMPTS  34-35 97%  33-33 100% 
ATTENDANCE  171292  350631 
   Games/Avg Per Game  5/34258  6/58438 
   Neutral Site Games    0/0

 

Ok, let's look at some general stats first.  We saw teams like OSU and USC just racking up the points and yards and first downs against their opponents.  Stanford has barely outscored their opponents.  They have fewer first downs.  Fewer yards.  The breakdown of offense is indicative of their style of offense.  Tons more rushing yards than passing yards.  700 more. Clearly a run first team, the very kind of team that Cal plays well.  They've actually even run fewer plays than their opponents.

Their 3rd down % is worse than their opponents.  I feel that, looking at these numbers, we can handle this team if we play to our ability.

 

RUSHING  GP  Att  Gain  Loss  Net  Avg   TD  Long  Avg/G 
Gerhart, Toby   11  191  1069  36  1033  5.4  14  46  93.9 
Kimble, Anthony  11  112  716  28  688  6.1  83  62.5 
Loukas, Alex   36  223  37  186  5.2  29  20.7 
Pritchard, Tavita  11  58  268  140  128  2.2  40  11.6 

 

Well, here it is.  The crux of Stanford.  The key to Stanford.  Toby Gerhart.  The Quizz of Stanford.  The Jeremiah Johnson of Stanford.  The every USC RB on that fucking team of Stanford.  He has almost 200 attempts on the year.  He's averaging 5.4 a carry, which I believe is more than Quizz.  Almost 100 yards a game.  He's the biggest part of their offense.  If we can shut him down, we will be able to control this game, I believe.  Said the same thing about Quizz, though, and we saw what happened there.

He's backed up by Anthony Kimble, who I know little about to be honest.  His numbers look better than Gerhart, but in a more limited role.  More yards per carry but about a hundred fewer carries.  The main focus is Gerhart.  If Kimble and Gerhart are both destroying us, then it could be a LOOONG day.

2211048_medium

Toby Gerhart via grfx.cstv.com

PASSING  GP  Effic  Cmp-Att-Int  Pct  Yards   TD  Long  Avg/G 
Pritchard, Tavita  11  113.4  125-217-10  57.6  1327  61  120.6 
Loukas, Alex   115.6  9-18-1  50.0  125  41  13.9 
Forcier, Jason   63.1  5-13-1  38.5  62  26  15.5 
Total..........  11  111.0  139-248-12  56.0  1514  10  61  137.6 
Opponents......  11  132.0  236-374-6  63.1  2619  15  55  238.1 

Tavita Pritchard.  Wasn't he the shmuckzoid that beat us last year?  The name angers me to this day!  Luckily, it appears he isn't very good.  120 yards a game.  57% completion rate.  113 QB efficiency.  The passing game clearly not the strength of the team.  That's why stopping Gerhart is so important.  It's like the Oregon game.  We were able to contain their run game and force them to pass.  They couldn't.  Masoli got 44 yards.  If we can do the same here, we can control the game. 

If we can force Pritchard to beat us, this game will most likely be ours.   Similar to Masoli, also, he can scramble.  He rushed for almost 50 yards against USC.  But passingwise, he was 9-21 for about 100 yards.

2157325_medium

Tavita Pritchard vtai grfx.cstv.com

 

RECEIVING  GP  No.  Yards  Avg   TD  Long  Avg/G 
Whalen, Ryan   11  36  438  12.2  30  39.8 
Baldwin, Doug   11  20  269  13.4  61  24.5 
Gunder, Austin   11  15  123  8.2  18  11.2 
Kimble, Anthony  11  12  88  7.3  15  8.0 
Gerhart, Toby   11  11  100  9.1  21  9.1 

 

As to be expected with the QB situation at Stanford, there are not great WR numbers.  The leader, Whalen, averages less than 40 yards a game.  Whalen leads the team with 36 receptions.  I think there are like 4 WRs on Arizona with more than that.  If these guys are beating us on Saturday, it means things have broken down.  And bad.

2211599_medium

Ryan Whalen via grfx.cstv.com

 

Ok, like GoDucks.com the Stanford website is freaking out.  I've written the bottom portion out two times and it deletes it twice.  Damn you, Stanford!  You've rejected me yet again.  So, I'll try to summarize my thoughts:

 

1.  Arizona ran all over us, because we had to respect the pass so much.  We were able to control Oregon, because we didn't need to respect their pass.  On that spectrum, Stanford is far closer to Oregon.  So, I think that this is the type of offense we can control.  Gerhart will probably get his yards, similar to how JJ got his in Oregon.  But hopefully, they will be empty yards.  If Pritchard and Co. are passing all over us, it will be a LONG day.  But I feel that given our defensive prowess, that will not happen.  Hopefully!

2.  On offense, I predict we see a LOT of running.  Stanford just gave 300 yards each to USC and Oregon in their last 2 games.  Now, of course, USC and Oregon are great running teams, no doubt about that.  But we aren't exactly slouches.  Apparently, Best is as healthy now as he has been in weeks.  Plus, if our offensive line can play more like they did against Oregon than OSU and USC, I think we can give Riley the time he needs to make throws. On the road, they were abysmal.  Hopefully, at home, it will be different.

Look, I get it.  It's been a long season.  An up and down season.  Big wins.  Crushing losses.  And with our 2 crushing losses in a row there, you feel uncomfortable about the game.  We all do.  Plus, its Big Game.  I was there in 2000 and 2001 when Stanford should have smacked us.  But we held strong, losing at the way end (in OT in 2000).  Throw the record books out in this one.  But looking at the stats, looking at all the games, I feel reasonably confident that Cal can take this one.  Our D is set up to stop a run-heavy offense as we face here.  Our O is set up to run the ball a lot against weak run Ds as we face here.  Let's get that axe back.  Let's do this thing.  Go Bears!

0 recs | Comment 26 comments | Add comment | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Isn't it the other way around on sacks?

The stat listed is “sacks by.” So stanfurd has made 33 sacks (near top of the conference) and given up just 17.

Realizing just how much Aaron Rodgers spoiled us.

by Ohio Bear on Nov 21, 2008 7:17 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

Duly noted. Sorry, I was writing this in a bit of haste, because chunks of it had vanished thanks to the Stanford D table. :(!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 21, 2008 7:38 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Kimble's a very good back as well

Fortunately, from what I’ve seen, he’s just the chocolate version of Gerhart with not quite as much tail-end speed. They both do the same things. I haven’t watch too much of them, but they both are big, strong backs.

They have a great offensive line too…

...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 21, 2008 7:26 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

I don’t doubt that they have a great running game. But my hope is that our D is set up to contain that running game as we have done with MSU and Oregon previously. That puts the onus on Pritchard to beat us. Hopefully, he can’t and won’t!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 21, 2008 7:39 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

In the effort of developing my swagger: We are going to crush these bastards, Gerhart is going nowhere except to the group, if Kimble even shows up for the game he is going backwards all game long and Pritchard is going to our offensive MVP with all the picks he will give up and the sacks he’s going to take.

by CountDuku on Nov 21, 2008 9:34 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

should say ground

by CountDuku on Nov 21, 2008 9:34 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

"If Kimble is destroying us, then things are truly bad."

I disagree, somewhat. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if Harbaugh and the rest of the Furd staff haven’t dissected and contrasted Cal’s defensive performances against OSU and Zona compared to Ucla, Oregon, and MSU and have decided to feature Kimble as their back, using Gerhart as the short yardage & relief guy.

All that being said, I still like Cal’s defense against the Furd offense. In fact, I completely believe that Cal holds the Furd to less than 20 points (offensively). The pit in my stomach comes from the fact that Cal has yet to sustain a long drive, and our offense is so hit-and-miss that we may score fewer than 14 offensive points.

Go Bears!

by SoCal Oski on Nov 21, 2008 7:52 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

I meant that more as if if Kimble is destroying us, then Gerhart is ALSO destroying us. But I see the confusion there and accept the criticism. I will clarify.

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 21, 2008 7:54 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I don't think their secondary can cover our receivers, to be honest

We just need time in the pocket.

Osaisai, one of their CBs, is the Pac-10 100m champion (‘til Jahvid joins track), but he’s very raw and lacks coverage instincts. I believe he does either punt or kick returns too.

...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 21, 2008 8:11 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

This is a good Stanford team

But I think Cal absolutely rolls tomorrow.

I share SoCal Oski’s concern about the Bears’ inability in recent weeks to sustain drives on offense. Indeed, Cal’s offense now ranks a horrid 111th in the country in third-down conversion percentage, at a paltry 29.7%.

That’s the bad news; here is the good news. The last two weeks for the Bears were not only on the road but against the 4th (OSU) and 6th (USC) best third-down-conversion defenses in the country. And guess who is #7: our own Cal Bears. Stanford, meanwhile, is way down in 95th place, and it gets even better for the Bears the following game, as Washington is #117 (out of 119). I thus expect Cal’s offense to rather suddenly get a lot better this weekend.

The only real source of concern for me, statistically, is that the Bears now rank 80th nationally in sacks allowed, while Stanford is #7 in sacks made. But this hasn’t prevented Stanford’s opponents from doing well in the passing game, as the Furd’s pass defense is statistically one of the worst in the conference.

Could Stanford end up controlling this game with Gerhart and Kimble? Yes. They average 5.0 yards per carry as a team, which is 19th best in the country. But USC (5.4) and Oregon (6.0) are even better, and the Bears were able to contain them pretty well.

The source for all these numbers:
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Nov 21, 2008 8:20 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

Where is the “eating the enemy” feature?

by Rishi on Nov 21, 2008 8:56 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

should be up this afternoon

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Nov 21, 2008 9:51 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

should be interesting

not sure how to eat a cardinal and a tree.

The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.

by carp on Nov 21, 2008 10:02 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Reminder – trees don’t have meet, ergo the recipe should be vegetarian.

by Rishi on Nov 21, 2008 10:24 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

"meet"?

is that some kind of tree sitting hippie vegitarian commie protien substance? ;)

Go Bears Go

by Rocksanddirt on Nov 21, 2008 10:35 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

This is why we need an edit button

by Rishi on Nov 21, 2008 10:38 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I think we will win, but because of visiting-team-Memorial-Stadium-suck-onset, not because we’re going to all of a sudden put 42 points up.

Other than our Oline vs their Dline, we have advantages at every matchup. Our WRs are better than their DBs, and our RBs are better than their Dline/LBs.

They’re going to try and blitz a lot to mess with Riley and our crappy Oline; but we have Best and Vereen, two guys who can kill blitz-opened backfields on swing/screen passes. They don’t really have this option.

Our DBs>their WRs/passing game, which will force them to run with their big lumbering backs. Our Dline plus our LBs > Gerhart and Kimble.

If we can get good field position or a special teams/defensive TD, I think we’ll be set.

Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.

by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 21, 2008 11:06 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

Agree with most, except Gerhart is surprisingly fast and shifty. Not just fast for a white guy, either. He’s just fast for a LB-sized guy. It’s pretty unsettling when you see him, and he’s definitely not lumbering.

...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 21, 2008 11:38 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

true...

…but the only significant defensive adjustment that SC made in the second half against Stanford was to bring a safety forward to defend on running plays, and that was more or less the end of that. Gerhart is good, but he is stoppable (eventually).

by DC Trojan on Nov 21, 2008 1:01 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yes. He is stoppable. SC’s safeties are otherworldly too.

...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 21, 2008 1:06 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

over/under on total # of punts for Cal and Cal + Stanfurd

I’m going with 6 and 15

The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.

by carp on Nov 21, 2008 1:04 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I feel that OSU is a better team than Cal. However, if Cal didn’t have so many special team breakdowns in that game, it was definitely winnable. If Cal can keep the special team breakdowns to a minimum (and maybe get some solid punts out of Anger), then I think we can put ourselves in a solid position to win tomorrow. Its been a rough couple of games these past two games. However, both were winnable. Cal couldn’t seal the deal on the road, which is frustrating. But we are at home, so I think we should be able to seal the deal!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 21, 2008 5:43 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Look...

The bottom line is we’re going to kick Stanfurd’s pathetic asses. Should we lose – for the second year in a row – even diehards like myself may become disenchanted. Let us all pray this does not happen. Again, not a religious man, but with Cal football it never hurts to pray to the supposed Almighty…

"I look forward to a future in which our country will match its military strength with our moral restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our purpose."

John F. Kennedy

by CaliSeth on Nov 21, 2008 11:32 PM PST reply reply   0 recs

Correction...

I meant to say disheartened, not disenchanted. I love the Bears too much to become disenchanted! Never, ever, will I become disenchanted! With me working about 80 hours a week to save my sorry job/ass, I have become delusional. The economy is tough, many of my friends have been laid off. It has literally become survival of the fittest out here guys! This is the fucking jungle man! As such I no longer have the luxury of getting drunk every night and spouting off here. That is why in my brief Friday night drunkery I used the wrong word I was looking for. My body is having trouble adjusting back to large amounts of hard grain alcohol…. Yikes!

GO BEARS!

BEAT THE WORTHLESS FUCKING FURD!

Spoiled trust fund babies can all burn in eternal HELL! Damnation to ALL! I pray for their parents stock portfolios to crash, so that they may all try to join the real world, were the will undoubtedly fail! Muah ha ha! Bitches!

"I look forward to a future in which our country will match its military strength with our moral restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our purpose."

John F. Kennedy

by CaliSeth on Nov 21, 2008 11:44 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to the 3rd Best Sports-Oriented Cal Blog on the net, where WE HAVE THE AXE and we're taking it on the Brock Mansion Party Yacht!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bendermonocledon_small
thenick's Emerald Bowl pics
Bear__small
Emerald Bowl / End of Season Review: A microcosm of everything that is good and bad about college football fandom (with pictures!)
Jackblack_small
More Emerald Bowl Photos
Small
Recruiting Update
Follett_small
Emerald Bowl Photos!

Recent FanPosts

Small
New Cal Recruit, Mark Brazinski, C
Script_cal_small
DBD 01.04.09 & 01.05.09 Aloha Fiesta Bowl
More_cascades_small
More (mediocre) Emerald Bowl Photos
Bnavatar_small
BCS vs. Playoffs Debate
Small
Pac-10 Bowl Idea
Bnavatar_small
DBD 1.02.08 Cotton Bowl Open Thread
Follett_small
DBD 1.01.2009: Tedford signs contract extension!
Rated-r_small
Cal to Land Five-Star Wide Receiver Recruit?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

The FanPost Hall of Fame

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Emerald Bowl Highlights

Recent FanShots