California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Eagles miracle run continues with road win over the Vikings Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Looking Back at Arizona: Cal's Cover Zero Gives up a Touchdown

I'm sorry that this post is weeks behind the actual game.  Culinary school has been pretty busy lately.  The semester ends in a few weeks and finals are coming up in early December.  I've been fairly busy lately practicing my mincing technique and ingredient sniff tests.  But better late then never, right?  

One thing which I noticed while watching the Arizona game was how disturbingly similar Arizona and Arizona State scored on our defense.

If you remember my last post, I showed how Arizona State scored against our man free coverage

Arizona scored in a very similar manner on a passing play.  Let's take a look at how it happened.

Arizona1_medium

Above is the pre-snap picture.  Arizona has "12 personnel" on the field - meaning they have 2 WRs, 2 TEs, and 1 RB.  Both TEs are on the right side of the offense's OL.  One TE is on the line of scrimmage (LOS), and a second one is off the LOS. 

Cal is in its typical 3-4 defense.  Cal appears to be playing man-coverage since both of Cal's CBs are lined up across from both of Arizona's WRs who are lined up as twins to the same side of the Arizona offense.

Star-divide

 

Arizona2_medium

On this play, all Arizona eligible receivers will go out on routes.  Of course, Cal doesn't know this.  Meanwhile, Arizona QB Willie Tuitama is trying to determine which Cal defenders will cover which Arizona receivers.  Arizona's playcall utilizes motion to help figure that out.  Arizona motions their 2nd TE across the offense.  Cal responds by having their SS notify the rest of the defense of the change of formation and appears to be passing off the man-coverage to another player.  I've shown the passed off man coverage with the yellow line broken by two smaller lines.

Arizona3_medium

But then the 2nd TE moves into the backfield back in the direction he originated from (shown by the red arrow).  Cal's SS regains the responsibility of coverage on that player in man coverage.  Thus, Tuitama knows the coverage of 3 of his 5 eligible receivers.  Tuitama knows Cal's corners are in man coverage covering the two Arizona WRs, and knows that Cal's SS is covering the 2nd TE in man coverage.  The question, is who is covering the Arizona RB and the other TE who is on the LOS? 

Arizona4_medium

I've circled the Arizona TE so you don't forget about him.  He's key to this play's success.  Tuitama has yet to really know who is going to cover the TE or the RB.  Yet Tuitama can assume that one of Cal's LBs will cover the RB.  That leaves the TE - who is going to cover the TE?  Is it going to be a Cal LB or the FS?  Note that in the picture above, there are 10 Cal defenders in the frame.  The 11th Cal defender, the FS, is showing single deep coverage.  Of course, he may not be in deep coverage.  He might instead be in man coverage. 

If Cal covers the TE with a LB, then the FS will most likely be in single deep cover-1 or man free defense.  On the other hand, if Cal covers the TE with the FS, then Cal is playing a Cover-0 with no deep safety help.

Arizona5_medium

Here's the post-snap picture.  The movement of the 2nd TE into the backfield as an H-back helps set up playaction.  Ultimately, Cal's coverage is revealed post-snap.  Cal's WLB and SS cover the 2nd TE in man coverage.  Cal's corners are playing man coverage on the WRs, and Cal's FS is playing man coverage on the 1st TE (the one that was on the LOS).  This leaves Cal with no deep safety help.  All of Cal's defenders in the secondary are on islands - on their own.  Cal has no deep safety.

Arizona6_medium

Tuitama knows exactly where he wants to go with the ball, and makes the pass.  Tuitama wants to attack the defense where it is vulnerable - where there is no safety help - and that's the deep middle.

Arizona7_medium

Tuitama goes to his go-to guy (the ball is the small yellow dot), Mike Thomas who is being covered by Syd'Quan Thompson.  Thomas runs a skinny post to the centerfield void and manages to get past Thompson.  Note in the picture above, I've shown Cal's FS covering Gronkowski with a big yellow circle (he was the TE that was on the LOS).  The fact that Cal was playing a Cover-0 drew the FS out deep center leaving Thompson 1 on 1 against Thomas with no help.

Arizona8_medium

Mike Thomas makes the catch, Thompson fails to make the tackle, and Arizona scores a touchdown.

Arizona9_medium

In my Pursuit Angles post, I mentioned how WRs sometimes are told by coaches to imagine stepping on the toes of the DB.  Thomas does exactly this.  Thomas is running a skinny post.

Arizona10_medium

Thomas makes his break when he's right on top of Syd.  Syd actually does a pretty good job anticipating the direction of the cut and staying with Thomas.

Arizona11_medium

The problem occurs in this play in the way Syd defended the pass.  Syd attempts to play the ball (the yellow dot) from underneath the receiver - most likely expecting more of a lower bullet pass that he could bat away.  Instead, the pass was a nice deep ball with plenty of air under it that went over the top of the WR, and thus by attempting to defend the ball from underneath the WR, Syd is not in position to bat the ball away and diminishes his chances of making a tackle.  The green area in the picture above represents all the unimpeded area for Thomas to make the catch.

Final Thoughts:

(1) QB guessing game.  Prior to the snap, the QBs are always trying to figure out which defenders are going to be covering which receivers.  On this play, Tuitama really only had to read Cal's FS.  If Cal's FS played deep coverage, Tuitama probably wouldn't have thrown to Mike Thomas (perhaps he still would have but it would have been a riskier pass).  If Cal's FS played man coverage on Gronkowski (the TE on the LOS), then Tuitama knew he could attack deep. 

(2) Syd gets beat two weeks in a row on similar routes.  The routes were posts - once against Arizona State and against this game.  Is this one of Thompson's weaknesses?  Against Arizona State, Thompson allows the ASU WR to get very good separation which ultimately led to the catch.  This play, Thompson maintains good coverage on the WR cut, but mis-anticipates the type of throw that will be thrown.  Namely, Syd attempts to defend the ball from underneath the WR in anticipation of a lower bullet pass.  Just looking at these two plays makes for fairly inconclusive judgments as to whether Thompson has problems with post routes, but it's definitely something that opposing offenses are probably looking at.

(3) You (generally) want to aggressively defend the middle of the field.  Being on the team with one of Cal's greatest CBs in the past few years, Daymeion Hughes, you sort of pick up a few pointers.  Hughes was always very willing to help out his understudies and gave them pointers all the time.  One of his oft repeated mantras was to protect the inside of the field.  That's where the big plays usually happen.  When in man coverage all alone, you want to do your best to cover the receiver as tightly as possible and break on routes towards the sidelines fairly aggressively (one not need to as aggressively defend the sideline routes because the sidelines themselves help you defend the receiver), but you always want to be aware and not get baited by double moves or routes which take the receiver to the middle of the field.  When receivers get in open space, they'll make catches and rack up YAC.

(4) Put air under the ball.  Too often I hear Cal fans say "X QB doesn't throw enough bullets" or "X QB needs to throw bullets like Y QB."  It seems like Cal fans always want bullets.  Cal fans don't want to see touch passes or passes that "float."  But the fact of the matter is that some passes require touch on the ball, aka "air under the ball."   Not every route calls for a bullet pass.  Some passes require touch passes so the balls go over LBs in zone, or go over safeties.  So don't always think that every pass has to be a bullet - that's not true. 

4 recs | Comment 36 comments | Add comment | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

nice post...thank you!

The Maharg makes me look like an idiot.

by carp on Nov 19, 2008 7:52 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

I love these posts. They really help me understand more about football and bring mroe perspective to what happens on the field.

by Rishi on Nov 19, 2008 7:57 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

Stop being so negative!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 8:01 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Let me try again

Stop wasting my time with these posts, cable car rallies suck, Twist has sex with sheep, etc

by Rishi on Nov 19, 2008 8:22 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

That’s the Rishi we know and tolerate!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 8:33 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Do you think that the cover zero was called as a run defense? Or did it organically occur due to the number of receivers going out?

And OSU passed with ease against zone coverage — is that good QB timing and awareness, or as the zone too soft?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Great post, too.

by sec119 on Nov 19, 2008 7:59 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

I disagree...that was Moevao's worst statistical showing of the year.

The zone was tight against the Beavers.

Where OSU had some success was that Moevao had all day to throw, but he was mostly able to find receivers when they were going across the field and running through multiple zone responsibilities. Plus, OSU just has 3 really good receivers who go up and get the ball—it’s tough to hold down the #1 passing offense in the conference.

Roses are Orange.

by CV3000 on Nov 19, 2008 10:35 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I think Cover Zero was called from the sidelines and probably did not occur organically. Was this a good defense to call? Hindsight is 20/20 and thus, no. But it was 1st and 10. The offense can run or pass. Of course, this is Arizona who passes a lot so I suppose it was a riskier call.

As for OSU passing on our defense… first off, there is no such thing as a “soft zone.” That term was made up by people who know nothing about football and think that because and offense completes passes against a zone defense that the zone defense isn’t non-soft (whatever “soft” truly means).

But to answer your question, what is the offense doing correctly when they are continuously completing passes against a defense? The WRs are finding the seams – the holes between zones. The QB is probably getting enough protection to allow the WRs to find the seams. The defenders either aren’t adjusting to the receivers and/or are being manipulated by the QB’s eyes. Or the zones are “prevent” zones, meaning they are playing deep and giving up easy underneath completions in order to prevent deep passes.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 19, 2008 4:13 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Execution

Nice play design by Arizona, fully exploiting the threat that Gronkowski brings to help free up Thomas. At the same time, you can’t say Cal was “fooled” on the play, and I don’t think Gregory and Co. deserve any criticism—not to suggest, Hyrdo, that you suggested that.

Rather than coaching, this play came down to execution and whether or not players won their individual battles. Not only did Thomas beat Syd, but Tuitama delivered a perfect ball. And he was able to do that because his O-line gave him perfect protection. Indeed, perhaps the most telling frame of all is the one that shows Follett sitting on his ass, with the left tackle proudly towering above him. Zach responded by playing much better at home the next two weeks, especially in the second half versus Oregon. In retrospect, maybe it would have made sense to blitz one of the inside backers. But on 1st and 10, that could just as easily have come up craps as well.

Tip of the hat to the Wildcats on this one. And a tip of the hat to you, Hydro, too.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Nov 19, 2008 9:27 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

That’s a whole lot of tipped hats. How many hats are you wearing right now? And can I get in on some of this tipped hat action?

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 9:29 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yes, I agree. This came down to execution and we had two failures on the field. Syd failed, and Follett got pancaked.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 19, 2008 4:14 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

double team

Seems like the key factor on this play was double-coverage (both the SS and Felder) on the motion TE. If Felder would have covered that TE on his own, the SS could have run with Gronkowski, and the FS would have been able to stay in the deep zone to break up the pass.

Does that make sense, or am I missing something?

by JoshinPortland on Nov 19, 2008 10:18 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

Yes, that makes sense. What you’re describing is the man free defense.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 19, 2008 4:17 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Why would a defense do that?

is the theory that there is some advantage in double -covering one receiver and giving up your deep safety?

by JoshinPortland on Nov 19, 2008 9:47 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Giving up your deep safety is always risky, but if you feel like the benefit of double-teaming a threatening offensive player outweighs the risk then the decision seems fine. Cal would have liked to see the DL and Follett get better pressure on Tuitama. If a defense can get a good quick pass rush then giving up your deep safeties isn’t as risky. Unfortunately, on this play Cal didn’t get a good pass rush on a play where they did give up deep safeties and the result was a touchdown.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 19, 2008 10:32 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I saw the same thing at first, but if you look at the later images, you’ll see one of the two Bears (I can’t tell if it was Felder or the safety) leave the second tight end and step in to cover the running back.

To be successful, Cal needed Follett on his feet and Tuitama on his ass, not the other way around.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Nov 19, 2008 11:08 AM PST reply reply   0 recs

I don't think so

I’d have to see the video to be sure, but It looks like one of the inside linebackers is covering the RB.

by JoshinPortland on Nov 19, 2008 2:47 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yes, it’s one of the ILBs that is covering the hook zones and the RB.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 19, 2008 4:16 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

my mistake

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Nov 19, 2008 6:21 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

It’s my fault. These screen grabs make it hard to keep track of people. This gives me an idea though. In the future I think I’ll put actual letter or number labels on the players. I could either label players by position such as “WLB” or use their numbers such as “#7” or use their name such as “Felder.” That would probably make it easier to figure things out.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Nov 20, 2008 2:39 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yes, you fucked up bvig time on this one, didnt you!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 20, 2008 7:45 AM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

NVTS. Nuts. NVTS!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 20, 2008 4:20 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

So my question is...

Why can’t we do this?

Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
But Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.

by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 19, 2008 1:01 PM PST reply reply   0 recs

Perhaps that photo will be sufficiently illustrative.

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 1:07 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

How’d he get like that?

...Scuzzlin fo some Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 19, 2008 1:15 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

The left tackle decided to stop playing pattycake and exploit his 100 pound advantage. You can sort of see that he’s got his “taunty” posture going full blast.

Roses are Orange.

by CV3000 on Nov 19, 2008 1:19 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Tripped over a pebble.

Look, it’s not even about Follett sitting on his tucus there. It’s more about the fact that Tuitama isn’t even close to be hurried, let alone touched. I know that Kevin Riley is a really talented QB. And I know that given time he can make the tough throws.

However, unlike Tuitama up there, he’s not getting the time that he needs. He didn’t get it against UCLA, often, let alone teams like USC and OSU.

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 1:20 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Why must you blame Justin Cheadle for all your problems.

by BearsNecessity on Nov 19, 2008 4:49 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Justin Cheadle defeated me in court the other day!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Nov 19, 2008 4:51 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

You must blame a lot of people if that’s your reason.

(I nailed it.)

...Scuzzlin fo a Jack in Da Box

by Thoroughbred on Nov 19, 2008 5:01 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Really. Killed by?

All of my paradigms are askew. Also, askance. Can someone stop the room from spinning?

Roses are Orange.

by CV3000 on Nov 19, 2008 9:39 PM PST to parent up reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to the 3rd Best Sports-Oriented Cal Blog on the net, where WE HAVE THE AXE and we're taking it on the Brock Mansion Party Yacht!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bendermonocledon_small
thenick's Emerald Bowl pics
Bear__small
Emerald Bowl / End of Season Review: A microcosm of everything that is good and bad about college football fandom (with pictures!)
Jackblack_small
More Emerald Bowl Photos
Small
Recruiting Update
Follett_small
Emerald Bowl Photos!

Recent FanPosts

Small
New Cal Recruit, Mark Brazinski, C
Script_cal_small
DBD 01.04.09 & 01.05.09 Aloha Fiesta Bowl
More_cascades_small
More (mediocre) Emerald Bowl Photos
Bnavatar_small
BCS vs. Playoffs Debate
Small
Pac-10 Bowl Idea
Bnavatar_small
DBD 1.02.08 Cotton Bowl Open Thread
Follett_small
DBD 1.01.2009: Tedford signs contract extension!
Rated-r_small
Cal to Land Five-Star Wide Receiver Recruit?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

The FanPost Hall of Fame

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Emerald Bowl Highlights

Recent FanShots

Womens BB vs St. Mary's Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Torrent
Cal vs Portland Basketball Live Stream
Emerald Bowl Pep Rally Pictures and Videos and more
Thanks to Okaydo from BI with the tip.
Isi Sofele HS Highlights
Marshawn Lynch vs Jets
Huskies poached our Offensive Line Coach

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

P4572527reg_small yellow fever

ad

Site Meter