I hate you, GoDucks.com
I put in a lot of time last night writing the Inside The Numbers post for Oregon. The stats from GoDucks.com kind of were screwy, but I figured it'd be OK. Then, I accidentally hit publish and the site was screwed up. The html tables from GoDucks.com were killing our website!?! So, I had to delete it. All that work lost. Quintuple Le Sigh.
Nonetheless, I learned a lot in doing the research, so after the fold, I'll recap my thoughts and tell you guys about some Oregon players to keep an eye on. Because I don't feel like making a big thing out of this, it wont be shmancy. Ragnarok has helped put some of the information back in in a safer format. I'm sorry that this will be more cursory than originally perceived, but I just don't feel like doing it all over again.
Overall Team Statistics |
Oregon Football
Oregon Overall Team Statistics
(as of Oct 25, 2008) All games
| TEAM STATISTICS | ORE | OPP |
| SCORING | 332 | 199 |
| Points Per Game | 41.5 | 24.9 |
| FIRST DOWNS | 199 | 159 |
| Rushing | 106 | 42 |
| Passing | 71 | 99 |
| Penalty | 22 | 18 |
| RUSHING YARDAGE | 2230 | 826 |
| Yards gained rushing | 2441 | 1083 |
| Yards lost rushing | 211 | 257 |
| Rushing Attempts | 373 | 294 |
| Average Per Rush | 6.0 | 2.8 |
| Average Per Game | 278.8 | 103.2 |
| TDs Rushing | 30 | 8 |
| PASSING YARDAGE | 1569 | 2107 |
| Att-Comp-Int | 243-131-9 | 322-188-9 |
| Average Per Pass | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Average Per Catch | 12.0 | 11.2 |
| Average Per Game | 196.1 | 263.4 |
| TDs Passing | 13 | 14 |
| TOTAL OFFENSE | 3799 | 2933 |
| Total Plays | 616 | 616 |
| Average Per Play | 6.2 | 4.8 |
| Average Per Game | 474.9 | 366.6 |
| KICK RETURNS: #-Yards | 26-625 | 30-593 |
| PUNT RETURNS: #-Yards | 20-327 | 12-65 |
| INT RETURNS: #-Yards | 9-56 | 9-113 |
| KICK RETURN AVERAGE | 24.0 | 19.8 |
| PUNT RETURN AVERAGE | 16.4 | 5.4 |
| INT RETURN AVERAGE | 6.2 | 12.6 |
| FUMBLES-LOST | 14-7 | 12-7 |
| PENALTIES-Yards | 53-469 | 62-551 |
| Average Per Game | 58.6 | 68.9 |
| PUNTS-Yards | 36-1495 | 55-2084 |
| Average Per Punt | 41.5 | 37.9 |
| Net punt average | 36.4 | 30.9 |
| TIME OF POSSESSION/Game | 26:15 | 33:45 |
| 3RD-DOWN Conversions | 44/114 | 54/143 |
| 3rd-Down Pct | 39% | 38% |
| 4TH-DOWN Conversions | 5/10 | 4/9 |
| 4th-Down Pct | 50% | 44% |
| SACKS BY-Yards | 28-161 | 12-70 |
| MISC YARDS | 0 | 0 |
| TOUCHDOWNS SCORED | 44 | 23 |
| FIELD GOALS-ATTEMPTS | 10-16 | 13-18 |
| ON-SIDE KICKS | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| RED-ZONE SCORES | 38-44 86% | 27-29 93% |
| RED-ZONE TOUCHDOWNS | 30-44 68% | 16-29 55% |
| PAT-ATTEMPTS | 38-40 95% | 22-23 96% |
| ATTENDANCE | 234279 | 237764 |
| Games/Avg Per Game | 4/58570 | 4/59441 |
| Neutral Site Games | 0/0 |
| Score by quarters | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | OT | Total |
| Oregon | 85 | 61 | 98 | 79 | 9 | 332 |
| Opponents | 16 | 92 | 44 | 44 | 3 | 199 |
First, if you look at the overall numbers, their run game and run D is MUCH MUCH MUCH better than pass game and pass D. They actually give up more pass yards than they have thrown for. But they have over double the rush yards than given up. Clearly, the strength of their team is in their running game.
This is especially true when you compare the running stats with the passing stats. They essentially have 3 RBs out there. LaGarrette Blount, Jeremiah Johnson, and Jeremiah Masoli (the ostensible QB). Masoli and Johnson are averaging 5.8 each a carry. Blount is even higher.
Compare that to the passing stats. Masoli has like a 118 rating, which is not great. 55% completion percentage and I think less than 6.5 per attempt. Arizona's 3rd wide out has over 30 receptions. No Oregon wide outs have over 30 receptions. Interestingly enough, Blount and Johnson have combined for about 5 receptions. Thought they would throw to their RBs more.
So, while Oregon does run the spread, it is wildly different than Tuitama and Co. out in Arizona. Tuitama and Co. are slinging the ball everywhere. Oregon is run, run, run, run, run. We have the LBs to stop them, I think. We shal see shall we not. The rain plays into their strength, but ours, too. We were able to shut down Javon Ringer, so we'll see if we can shut down their rushing attack, it will be a large challenge. If we can and we force them to throw, it takes them out of their game and puts Cal in a great position to win. Easier said than done. <Note from Ragnarok: So, I don't know what is wrong with GoDucks.com, but apparently it was the defensive table of statistics that nearly killed our blog. I don't know what's wrong, and I don't particularly care. Just go here if you want to see the actual defensive statistics that Twist is talking about. It won't kill your browser, I swear. Besides, it's Friday afternoon, so if it does kill your browser, well...tech support's probably already gone for the weekend, and with your computer dead, you've got a good excuse to head out early too. Just tell your boss it was the IRS website (or something else worky-related -- definitely *not* college football statistics) that did it.> As for defense, it is sort of the opposite of ours. Their true strength is up front with Nick Reed and Will Tukuafu. They are killer DEs and have combined for 24 tackles for loss and 14 sacks. Sick! 3 out of their top 4 tackles guys are DBs, not LBs. Never the most prudent set up. Cal fans might remember Patrick Chung as the guy who got Patrick Chunged 2 years ago by Marshawn. That was 2 years ago, he is a LOT better now and has about 50 tackles. Jarius Byrd has been abused (ABUSED) by Tha1 the past few years. Im sure hes happy to see Tha1 in Eagle green. Byrd also has about 50 tackles. Their DBs are really strong. But if their DBs are making the tackles tomorrow, it bodes well for Cal.
Overall, this team seems pretty similar to ours. Concerns with the passing game, but strong, strong running game. Pretty solid defense that has had some unfortunate break downs. The rain appears to favor both teams, insomuch as we both have running games as our strength.
Final Thought: So, how do I think this game will go? Tough to tell. It is not going to be a blowout, especially with the rain. That is for sure. It might be lower scoring than most expect. Last year with a much better Oregon O and a much worse Cal D, Oregon put up 24 in Oregon. If we can hold them to that amount, I feel like we have a good chance here. Lord knows we are going to have guys just sitting there spying on Masoli the entire time. If we can just execute tackling, I think we have a decent chance of being able to stymie their run game. It won't be easy, but if we can do that, I think we can force Masoli to throw throw throw. He certainly will not be as bad as Craft last week, but if we can get a few turn overs, we could make some hay. Certainly, what helped last year was that we got 4 TOs and gave up none. Now, I doubt that two of their return guys are going to run into each other again, giving Jahvid Best an easy fumble recovery. However, with the conditions as they are, ball security will be key. Wet Ball Mechanics. I repeat. Wet Ball Mechanics. That will be key. On offense, I have major concerns about our O-Line. They are beaten up bad now. So, that's why the D is going to be key. Their DBs were hyped coming into the season, but have been blow up some. Can Riley blow them up again? I don't know, but the conditons might make that a moot point. Plus, our WRs are going to have to improve on their catching skills here. So, I don't see us putting up 40+ like we did to years ago. This is going to be a tight game. I predict whomever wins the turn over battle will get this one. May it be us. Again, sorry for the stream of consciousness post her, I am just frustrated with all that lost work. Anyway, what do you think? |
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The things you do for this site, Twist, just amazing.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
Question from a Duck
Can I bring a backpack into Memorial? Need it to carry my rain gear.
Nice analysis. I think this is going to be a low scoring game as Oregon’s D takes advantage of Cal’s banged up O-line, and Cal’s LBs slow down the Oregon running game.
Yes, but it will be thoroughly somewhat searched.
by CalBandGreat on Oct 31, 2008 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks!
Sadly, I think the TSA might confiscate my flask on the flight down, so there won’t be much for them to find.
Seriously, no umbrellas. As crazy as it sounds, they don’t allow umbrellas into the stadium.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Umbreallas? Please...
Oregonians view an umbrella as a sign of weakness. Anyone spotted with one around Portland is obviously a newcomer (probably Californian *spit*), and treated with disdain. The only exception being on the golf course.
You can bring your own bottled drinks into the stadium as long as they are unopened.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Sorry jfwells,
PROHIBITED ITEMS
• Alcohol of any kind
• Glass Bottles
• Umbrellas
• Animals
• Cans • Hand Cuffs
• Banners
• Sticks/Poles
• Spiked Attire/Chains
• Beach Balls
• Fireworks
• Horns
• Weapons
• Coolers of any kind
• Personal Video Cameras
• Hard Fruit or Vegetables unless cut into small pieces
• Bags larger than 14" × 14" × 6"
• Frisbees
I swear, they change the fruit requirements for every game: sometimes it’s no fruit, sometimes it’s no large fruit, sometimes it’s no soft fruit, and now it’s no hard fruit or uncut fruit. It’s as bad and inconsistent as how they won’t even let me in with water bottles sometimes.
ಠ_à²
I went to that Dubs-Jazz game in the playoffs a few years ago (The Baron Dunk one). They tried to take my water bottle away. I said I had a medical condition that required water. It worked then.
Maybe itll work for you.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
What a racist policy!
‘PROHIBITED ITEMS’
-Animals
So stegosaurus can play for Cal but he can’t bring his family in to watch? Blatent, ugly, racism!
by SonofCalifornia on Oct 31, 2008 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions

Twist, you lost your data too?… now you know how I feel. Actually, I feel your pain man.
Step 1: Shock
“No f****n way… No f****n way… NO F****N WAY…. NO… NO…NOOOOO!!!”
Step 2: Denial
“I can get it back… there must be an autosave feature… where is it!!? No way I lost it.. it must be in my cache… where is it”
Step 3: Misplaced anger
“Goddamn terrorists… goddamn nazis… f*** you George Bush… goddammit… God? if you’re for real you’ll bring my data back right f***n now!”
Step 4: Hopelessness
“I’m so f-ed in the A… I’m sooooo f-ed… screw this I didn’t want to write this post anyway… what value did it add… I’m almost glad it gone… yeah, I’m glad.”
Step 5: This isn’t fun anymore – you’re forced to redo it but now it’s less fun than a root canal
“What excuse can I give to get out of doing this… F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*k…F*********k!!!”
… sound familiar?

by 



















































