Q+A with Addicted To Quark
Which Quacker is that? JShufelt? JTLight? JTakimoto? Why are they always with the J? Who knows?
I shouldn't be mean. Like nation-states, each blog has a "interests, not friends" sort of relationship with the other blogs. With some blogs (who will go unnamed), we have a sort of Cold War Detente. With other blogs, we tolerate their presence. Some blogs, we look forward to their Center about Cougars.
And some we just plain hate. For example, Driveline Mechanics. You call that an unconventional look at baseball? Here's an unconventional look at baseball, the Phillies are good. They might win it all. You can thank me later.
And Third Quarter Collapse? THAT WAS OUR IDEA FIRST! Nobody collapsed better in the 3rd quarter than Cal. Nobody!
So, when you get a blog that you have strong same interests with, you don't want to enrage them. And we seem to have a good relationship with the two Oregon blogs. Addicted To Quack is a particularly fun one. I don't know why we get along so well. Probably because we are all a bunch of hippies. California hippies. Oregon hippies. We're all the same. Long haired, 140 lbs, stunningly gorgeous Jews. All of us. Except for that JShufelt guy. I think hes only moderately gorgeous.
So, with the upcoming game against Oregon, we decided to contact our Quark-loving friends and see what their thoughts were on the upcoming game.
Also: The CGB has been posting a lot lately. To not be forgotten are other excellent posts: See Maharg shotgunning a beer; some more photos from the Cal game, and videos of the awesome marching band performance, see my post-game thoughts and overly generous grade to Riley; our discussion of the Top25, and see our once-per-month post by CBKWit. Also, Hydro's amazing analysis and a discussion regarding running up the score. Plus, YouTube Thursday, and the Roundtable.

Honestly, do you like your jerseys?
Seattle Quacker: It's likely that 396 Duck fans would give you 396 different answers. I got chills when Oregon took the field in all white versus the Huskies last season. I think the yellow helmets are abysmal. Some of the combos look nice. Then there's Oregon's game last week at Arizona State. If you look like that, you'd better score 54 on the home team. As for the jerseys specifically - The "Bellotti Bold" font is cartoonish and makes some of the numbers hard to distinguish. That, and reflective silver names on the backs of white jerseys might as well be invisible. But...if young players like LaGarrette Blount say "those unis are cool so I think I'll go play at Oregon...", then I'm cool with it. Give Blount the ball. I'll go get new glasses.
If you could pick one Cal player to not play in this week's game, who would it be and why?
Seattle Quacker: Alex Mack, Cal's all-everything senior at center. He's good. He's smart. He's a great leader. Offensive success begins and ends with cohesion up front. Take Mack out of the lineup and everyone else will suffer.
Miss Tedford much?
Seattle Quacker: Nah. Maybe a couple years ago. Chip Kelly seems to be working out.
Did you want Karl Dorrell to be fired?
Seattle Quacker: No. Nor did we want Bill Doba fired. For obvious reasons.
jtlight: We didn't want Tom Holmoe fired ever. Ah 2001.
Where would you prefer to live? In hell or Corvallis?
Seattle Quacker: Trick question. We see right through you.
What will Donald Duck dress up as for Halloween this year?
Seattle Quacker: Shasta - the University of Houston mascot that The Donald pummeled at Autzen last year.
Who is your second favorite team (excluding Cal since they are your favorite team)?
Seattle Quacker: Whoever is playing the Huskies.
Which would you prefer? To get shutout by Cal and lose by 70 points? Or to lose to Oregon State by 1 point?
Seattle Quacker: I asked the audience and they said "D" - a hot branding iron in the eyeball.
Who is the #1 O player Cal fans should focus on?
Seattle Quacker: Chris Harper. In two games he's gone from true freshman QB with an iffy arm to an interesting prospect at WR. He had a huge TD grab with seconds remaining in the first half against UCLA. He busted a 62-yarder late against ASU. It's not often a true freshman leads the Ducks in receiving two straight games. It's even more impressive that he did it while sharing the field with Jaison Williams, Jeff Maehl and Terence Scott.
Who is the #1 D player Cal fans should focus on?
jtlight: Nick Reed. Hands down, this guy is one of the most fun players to watch. He's undersized and doesn't look like much, but he is one of the best defensive ends in the country. He never gives up, and is leading the league in sacks and 2nd in tackles for loss (behind his counterpart Will Tukuafu). Though there are other players more talented than Reed, he makes plays because he plays every play like it's his last.
Why the hatred for Allioti (thats the D Coordinator)?
Seattle Quacker: Hate is a tough word. Most of us simply agree that Allioti has given it his best shot and hasn't come through. When Oregon's D is expected to be great, they're just okay. When the D's supposed to be just okay, they're worse. Oregon has to develop a group of linebackers capable of dominating a game more than once every 10 years. Detailed breakdowns often reveal guys out of position or over pursuing, leading to missed tackles and big plays. So the fans see fundamentals as an issue and that reflects on the coaching. The anti-Allioti bandwagon got pretty full after the play-action fiasco against Boise State. Some of us have been on that bandwagon for many years.
Read Related
Comments
Jewish Hippies?
Yeah yeah yeah, I know. Three thousand years of tradition from Moses to Sandy Koufax. But come off it, Twist, you aren’t really even Jewish. You’re Polish Catholic. It’s all a part of your sick Mrs. Twist thing.
And what about those of us not even pretending to be “of the tribe?” Where does that leave us Catholics who remain so (sort of)? Can’t we play the hippy too? Are we not hippish enough? If you bathe us, do we not scream?
And that thing about all these Ducks starting their name with J — I think they’re actually Borg.
Go Bears!
by SoCal Oski on Oct 31, 2008 8:26 AM PDT 0 recs
Borg or Quark? Get it straight, SoCal Oski. There are many holes in your story!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Oct 31, 2008 8:43 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Our answers to their questions.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Oct 31, 2008 8:49 AM PDT 0 recs
Why are you posting pictures of Jordan Farmar on this blog?
"You can have the alimony. But I want some pussy payments!" - Chris Rock
by oaktownmario on Oct 31, 2008 8:51 AM PDT 1 recs
NAILED IT!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Oct 31, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I’ll take moderately gorgeous.
It's spelled "S-h-u-M-i-l-d-l-y-A-t-t-r-a-c-t-i-v-e"
by JShufelt on Oct 31, 2008 9:14 AM PDT 0 recs
So they're big fans of Nuclear Physics?
I thought that was our thing at Cal. Ehh, screw it, I’m more of a string theory guy anyway.
by DougOLis on Oct 31, 2008 9:43 AM PDT 0 recs
I can’t stand Ferengi’s! We better destroy these Ferengi Ducks!
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on Oct 31, 2008 10:05 AM PDT 0 recs
Me too brother. If I am not mistaken that is Quark in the picture. Couldn’t stand that guy!
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
up
0 recs
LOL. The title has Quarks name in it! I looked at that and my dyslexia made me think it said Quack! Smooth, Twist, smooth…
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Im so witty!
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Oct 31, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You just ninja’d Seth’s mind!
It's spelled "S-h-u-M-i-l-d-l-y-A-t-t-r-a-c-t-i-v-e"
by JShufelt on
Oct 31, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No Seth, you are mistaken
that is not Quark. It is Jordan Farmar. His haircut and wardrobe change did not make a difference. Look:

Here’s his look without the ’fro and fucla jersey:

"You can have the alimony. But I want some pussy payments!" - Chris Rock
by oaktownmario on
Oct 31, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Seth, what’s up with no-luv for Quark? Dude was one of the funniest characters in DS9 (that’s Deep Space 9 for all you non-Trekkies out there).
by SonofCalifornia on Oct 31, 2008 10:47 AM PDT 0 recs
OK, you’re right. Quark was a good guy. I just still have bad blood with the Ferengi’s going back to my TNG days. I shouldn’t hold Quark accountable for some of the unscrupulous activities of his brethren. Plus, didn’t Quarks nephew join Starfleet? So I guess his family was OK. Sorry for my Quark bashing.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 11:00 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I’VE HAD IT UP TO HERE WITH YOUR QUARK BASHING!
Also, your Vasser bashing.
Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Oct 31, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Shouldn’t we get back to bashing those that deserve it: Longshore? The Ducks?
No, but I kiiiiid, I kiiiid!
by SonofCalifornia on Oct 31, 2008 11:15 AM PDT 0 recs
Oh Damn
Hour by hour weather for game time isn’t looking good:

by SonofCalifornia on Oct 31, 2008 11:20 AM PDT 0 recs
I think this will be an advantage to us. If we have to use all three backs (Best, Vereen, Slocum) a bunch it should work. The occasional perfectly thrown pass by Riley will also help. Remember the torrential rain during the USC game last year? We damn near could have won that game. So, I’m not too worried about the rain. Plus, with the drought it will be really good for water reserves. Oddly enough I am concerned about the QB on the Quack squad. Seems wrong considering he is their 25th string QB. Someone will need to run the pain train on him early in the game to rattle him.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I don’t necessarily agree that the advantage is given to us. I’m not sure if either team has an advantage. Clearly, both of these teams’ offenses are most successful when they run the ball. Our O-line issues may become painfully apparent if we can’t run tomorrow. I do believe, however, our defense will make things tough for Oregon’s running game. I think we’re evenly matched and the winner will simply be the team that takes better care of the ball. With the rain and the youth of both teams’ RBs, ball security could be a notable issue. I am pleased, however, with how well our RBs have taken care of the ball so far. Neither Shane nor Jahvid has had a single fumble all year.
ಠ_ಠ
by Berkelium97 on
Oct 31, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
up
0 recs
not quite.
they have each fumbled at least once. Though in general we have been very good with ball security. (hence the overall +15 TOM or whatever)
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on
Oct 31, 2008 11:39 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Oregon has had some fumbling issues.
Esp. on snaps and handoffs. This could really bite us in the ass.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Oct 31, 2008 11:42 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I wouldn’t mind seeing that big back we have get some playing time. I can’t remember his name, but he is big and tough. I think he is a redshirt freshmen. He may be just what we need for a game like this where running will be so important.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
0 recs
slocum?
yeah, but I don’t think he’s up on the full offense yet, so they’ve limited his playing time, and how to you not play vereen, when he averages something like 6.5 – 7 yrd per carry….
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on
Oct 31, 2008 11:59 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Geurts?
He’s our backup fullback. I wouldn’t mind seeing him. He had some good runs against WSU.
Our team has three fumbles this year, but I cannot figure out who has fumbled. According to ESPN, none of our RBs have fumbled and none of our QBs have fumbled. Now that Rocksanddirt mentioned it, I remember one specific game during which both Shane and Jahvid had a fumble (I think it was a home game), but I can’t find any reliable stats regarding our fumbles.
ಠ_ಠ
by Berkelium97 on
Oct 31, 2008 12:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah Geurts. You have a good point though, Rockanddirt. Vereen has been too productive to take out. I was just thinking if our offense starts to bog down in the rain, we should see about getting the big guy and Slocum some carries. Sometimes the up the middle plays just don’t work well with the little guys.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think one of them was Sundberg’s 100mph rifle longsnap to Anger, and it went through Anger’s hands.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
Now Go Away.
And Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Oct 31, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Do you remember if we lost that fumble or if we recovered it? Either way, we had that same problem in a punt in the rain against U-dub last year. Let’s hope that doesn’t happen again in tomorrow’s rain.
ಠ_ಠ
by Berkelium97 on
Oct 31, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think we recovered it…but still turned over on downs, with a big loss.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
Now Go Away.
And Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Oct 31, 2008 1:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Officially, that play resulted in a blocked punt. Remember that Anger actually picked it up and tried to kick it.
Go Bears!
by Ohio Bear on
Oct 31, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You are correct…my bad.
Sheriff of the Welcome Team.
Welcome.
Now Go Away.
And Stop Arguing Nate vs. Kevin.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Oct 31, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
They both fumbled vs. Colo St
...nuh nuh nuh gone
by Thoroughbred on
Oct 31, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
stalling our first quarter drives
...nuh nuh nuh gone
by Thoroughbred on
Oct 31, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
things never look good for whoever has a saturday commute.
by sec119 on
Oct 31, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
up
1 recs
Iowa vs Illinois gets HD but not us?
That’s quite disappointing.
ಠ_ಠ
by Berkelium97 on
Oct 31, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
up
0 recs
What it is is ridiculous. Oh well, better than the radio, though I do like Starkey. Anyone remember that Washington St. game last season (I think) where we all pretty much had to listen to it on the radio or go to Memorial? I think that might have been the famous slingbox game. That was a unique experience.
President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!
by CaliSeth on
Oct 31, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
up
0 recs
That slingbox game was a good time. I was hoping they’d do that again, but they have not said anything about it since. I wouldn’t have minded going up to Memorial to watch one of the games that was on one of those bizarre comcast jewelry channels.
ಠ_ಠ
by Berkelium97 on
Oct 31, 2008 12:36 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The ABC games always seem to have some sort of HD when I watch them… Maybe just extremely high-quality cameras or only certain angles have HD. It’s just weird.
...nuh nuh nuh gone
by Thoroughbred on
Oct 31, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think they have mostly HD cameras
but not a full 4 sets of HD trucks and support equipment yet. so, some of it is HD, but since it can’t be the full broadcast they don’t say it, and may not pump it out over the air as HD. But since some of the camera stuff is the quality is still pretty good.
The only drawback I’ve noticed is that on espn360 if I go to look at some of it, the non-hd games quality is quite a bit lower than the hd games quality. Otherwise, for my cheap tv…it’s fine.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on
Oct 31, 2008 1:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs


















