California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



Saturday Bye Week TV Watching (Open Thread)

The Bears get the weekend off right now, so you may be taking the weekend off from watching college football too.  That's OK, I guess.  I mean, it IS Fleet Week and all, and the Blue Angels are performing this afternoon.  Might be nice to have a relaxing, stress-free weekend, what with the Bears guaranteed not to lose and all.  Y'know, recharge for the Pac-10 stretch run and all.  You wouldn't want to get all burnt out early, would you?

Still, if you're a college football addict like me, there's plenty of reasons to plant yourself on the couch for almost 14 straight hours today, and they get started early.  Immediately following College Gameday is the Red River Rivalry (née Shootout) in Dallas at 9am West Coast time, following all the way through UCLA @ Oregon, which should end close to 11pm tonight.  Here's a full schedule of games on TV, and others of interest:

Broadcast TV:
#5 Texas @ #1 Oklahoma - 9:00AM, ABC
Arizona St @ #8 USC - 12:30PM, ABC
Tennessee @ #10 Georgia, 12:30PM, CBS
#4 LSU @ #11 Florida, 5:00PM, CBS

Some juicy matchups here, although I'd be somewhat surprised if either 12:30 game was within 2 touchdowns at halftime.

Basic Cable:
Minnesota @ Illinois - 9:00AM, ESPN
Colorado @ #16 Kansas - 9:30AM, ESPN2
Nebraska @ #7 Texas Tech - 12:00PM, Comcast Sports Net Bay Area
Purdue @ #12 Ohio St OR Notre Dame @ #22 North Carolina, 12:30PM, ESPN
#23 Michigan St @ Northwestern, 12:30PM, ESPN2
#6 Penn St @ Wisconsin, 5:00PM, ESPN
#17 Oklahoma St @ #3 Missouri, 5:00PM, ESPN2

Once USC has finished putting away the Sun Devils, I'll probably spend the afternoon seeing if Javon Ringer and the Spartans can keep making Cal look good, or if they'll let 5-0-but-untested Northwestern ruin their first national ranking in quite some time.  Penn State at Wisconsin also intrigues me, if for some reason LSU @ Florida isn't entertaining enough (i.e., the score is 7-3 in the 3rd quarter).

Premium Cable:
#14 Utah @ Wyoming - 11:00AM, The Mtn.
TCU @ Colorado St - 12:30PM, CSTV
New Mexico @ #9 BYU, 3:00PM, The Mtn.
Washington St @ Oregon St, 3:30PM, Fox College Sports Pacific (Comcast 415)
UCLA @ Oregon, 7:15PM, Fox College Sports Pacific (Comcast 116, 169, 410)

Checking my cable package, it appears as though I could get just about any game I wanted if I was willing to pay for its, I've only listed games of some interest.  A couple Pac-10 games are on, although it appears that the only one I can watch is UCLA @ Oregon, which will be shown on 3 channels, all of them currently airing Jewelry TV.  TCU should handle Colorado State without too many problems, but if they can't, Cal looks good yet again.  Finally, although my cable package won't get me this week's BYU game, I can watch a rerun of last week's game vs. Utah State on BYUTV @ 5am this morning.  I get BYUTV??  Weird.

Not on TV:
Arizona @ Stanford, 2:00PM

I'm actually really disappointed that this won't be on TV; not that I expect great football or anything, but I really wanted to take a look at Arizona, next week's opponent.  See, while doing some research for an unrelated post, I uncovered some interesting stuff:

Star-divide

When I was coming up with my Top 25 for this week, I decided to start with a little unbiased reference, so I compiled the top 40 teams ranked by Jeff Sagarin's 'Predictor' rating, which he considers to be the single best number to predict the future winners.  It mostly contained the usual suspects, and the top of the list looked a lot like the top of the AP poll, but one team in particular stuck out at me:  Arizona at #13.  Really?  13??  The Arizona Wildcats as the 13th best football team?

Granted, Arizona hasn't played a tough schedule, but other than the debacle at New Mexico, they've been running up the score on everybody:  70-0 over Idaho, 41-16 over Toledo, 31-10 over UCLA, and 48-14 over Washington.  That's some serious offense, despite the mediocre competition.

However, it's pretty striking just how mediocre the competition has been.  Sagarin ranks their schedule just 133rd in the country (includes I-AA teams; there are only 119 Division I-A teams), and the individual ranks of their opponents are not inspiring:  UCLA (86), New Mexico (90), Washington (103), Toledo (121), and Idaho (192, the worst in Division I-A by a fair margin).

Yes, the Wildcats rank 2nd in the country in total defense, but look at the NCAA ranks of the offenses they've faced:  84 (Toledo), 93 (Idaho), 96 (New Mexico), 105 (Washington), and 111 (UCLA).  And sure, ranking 8th in the country in scoring offense is also impressive, but they've faced equally flaccid defenses:  63 (New Mexico), 70 (UCLA), 76 (Toledo), 118 (Washington) and 119 (Idaho), with the last two teams being the absolute worst in the country.

Basically, I can't tell if Arizona is actually good, or their schedule is simply that bad.  The fact that they lost at New Mexico certainly isn't a good sign, as the Lobos are hardly world-beaters.  Sagarin's rating is impressed by the scoring margin, but I am not.  Honestly, in what I saw of the UCLA and UW games, they looked pretty good, but more telling, the Bruins and the Huskies looked awful.  I just can't tell.

Really, this is why I'm disappointed the 'Zona-'Furd game isn't on TV.  I need another chance to look at them.  Stanford, a bellwhether opponent?  Sure, why not.  These are not Walt Harris' bumblestums, or even Buddy Tevens' mediocrity.  The Cardinal are a decent team, and if their stats don't quite show it (76th in scoring offense, 81st in scoring defense), it should be noted that Sagarin considers their schedule the 7th-toughest in the nation, and also considers them, by far, the best team Arizona will have faced all year.  If Arizona blows out Stanford on the Farm, then I'll be a believer, and I'll head down to Tucson very, very wary.  However, I have a feeling that the Cardinal will give Arizona all it can handle, and might come away with the win.  In any case, this game *should* tell us a lot more about what Cal can expect in the desert next Saturday.

And Stanford?  Currently, they sit at 3-3, with an outside shot at a bowl.  However, to get there, I think they need to sweep their next 3 games, vs. Arizona, @ UCLA, and vs. Washington State.  All of those are winnable games.  However, if they come out of that stretch with any fewer than 6 wins, it's going to take a big upset to get that final win for bowl eligibility; they finish the season @ Oregon, vs. USC, and @ Cal.  You hate to say a game on October 11th is a must-win for Stanford, but I think that's the case.

0 recs | Comment 741 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

What the hell is a bumblestum?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 7:14 AM PDT   0 recs

A deliberate misspelling of ‘stumblebum’?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 8:55 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

What’s a stumble bum?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:28 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

you?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

NAILED………….it?

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is a great week for football

Battle of top 10 teams at 11am? Score!

--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Oct 11, 2008 9:06 AM PDT   0 recs

from Ted Miller's notebook

found here:

California has intercepted 10 passes in five games — tops in the conference —matching the Bears total from all of 2007.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:13 AM PDT   0 recs

well, my dog peed and pooped all over my house...what'd I miss?

7-3 Oklahoma, huh?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:38 AM PDT   0 recs

oh yeah

nothin’ like finding poop in various locations around your house…especially on a saturday morning. i can’t wait to have kids.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:49 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

oh, did my sarcasm not come through?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:51 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh it did...

but you have to experience it yourself…so much more experience

by Paragon SC on Oct 11, 2008 9:53 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Awesome

I’m excited!

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:57 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is why I have a cat.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is why I have neither

by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 11, 2008 10:42 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

You should get a cat!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:50 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Texas’s O-line isn’t holding up too well against Oklahoma’s D-line.

ಠ_ಠ

by Berkelium97 on Oct 11, 2008 9:48 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I’m not sure many O-lines would.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:51 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

and Minnesota leading Illinois???

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 9:50 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Unbelievable...

dumb F—-ing luck

Nice catch

by Paragon SC on Oct 11, 2008 9:56 AM PDT   0 recs

Carpenter threw a TD pass against USC already???

Not a Longshorite. Not a Rilerian. I'm a Mansionite.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Oct 11, 2008 10:15 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

is Carpenter even going to play?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I thought it was for sure that he wasn’t going to play. Or was it just “doubtful”?

Not a Longshorite. Not a Rilerian. I'm a Mansionite.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Oct 11, 2008 10:22 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

"Very Questionable"

Is what I have read…don’t trust Erickson, he likes to play mind games

by Paragon SC on Oct 11, 2008 10:23 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

If he does play, he’s going to be terrible. He might hold up for a quarter or two, but then he’s going to play like a one-legged Nate Longshore from last year, except without a reliable O-line. If they want any chance of making a bowl game, they should just let Carpenter heal and try to take respectable losses against USC and Oregon.

ಠ_ಠ

by Berkelium97 on Oct 11, 2008 10:28 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah, i think ASU is starting a 5-game losing streak in the face, meaning they pretty much have to run the table after that to make a bowl game. frankly, i think both Arizona and Oregon State could beat them too, but they have to get one of those games.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:31 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Which is why Carpenter will play, since they’re approaching must win territory.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:32 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I really feel sorry for their situation. We know how it feels to have a lot of pre-season hype and then have a crushing season. It is not fun.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:33 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Nope. It’s going to get ugly, real fast. I think USC rolls by 35+

Not a Longshorite. Not a Rilerian. I'm a Mansionite.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Oct 11, 2008 10:21 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

1st quarter
USC greater than 0, ASU 0

That’s about as far as I’ll go with that one.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:24 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

NERD!

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

“Hello, hands. Why did I wait in line for 1 hour to get your autograph and then I couldnt even get a photo with you? Why? WHY”

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:32 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Actually you should think the opposite

If Arizona blows them out they’ll be overconfident heading into their matchup with California. If they play worse you can expect a rebound effort.

Root for Arizona 120 Stanford 0.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:29 AM PDT   0 recs

But if they lose, they might start to feel insecurities about their play and not play to their level.

Root for Stanford 120, Arizona 0.

I'm no The Maharg! But I try. Oh, how I try!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i dunno

Lute Olson’s a good coach, but asking for a shutout is asking a lot…

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:32 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i thought i'd point out

that since the Pac-10 has 7 (seven!) bowl tie-ins this year, any Pac-10 team that gets to 6 wins is pretty much guaranteed to make a bowl game.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:37 AM PDT   0 recs

So there is still hope for Wazzu!

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

no.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:10 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I thought there was a rule that any 7-5 team from any conference gets in ahead of a 6-6 team with a conference tie in?

by norcalnick on Oct 11, 2008 11:25 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i could be mistaken...i don't have time to look things up

i thought the rule was any 7-5 conference team gets in before any 6-6 conference team, and any 7-5 team without a conference tie-in gets in before any 6-6 free agent, but a 6-6 with a conference tie-in will get in before any 7-5 team without a conference tie-in.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:39 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

21-20 Red River Shootout halftime

As Keith Jackson would say, “What we’ve got ourselves here is a barrrrnburrrner. WHOA NELLIE!”

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:37 AM PDT   0 recs

Wonder how Mack Brown will find a way to lose this one. He’s like 1-7 in this thing right?

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:58 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

4-7, actually

but there was a 5-game losing streak in there

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:04 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

sorry, 4-6

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:06 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It’s about to be 4-7.

Muschamp’s defense apparently believes the field is five yards long.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Stoops owns him

and Muschamp now apparently, BLITZING ON THIRD AND LONG?

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:06 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah, a couple of those wins were in the late 90’s. texas had ricky williams, and oklahoma was so bad they lost to Cal.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

and minnesota recovers a fumble deep in Illinois territory

what’s going on? are the golden gophers actually good?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 10:42 AM PDT   0 recs

Shit re:next year.

by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 11, 2008 10:43 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

WOOHOO ANOTHER BIG ROAD GAME!

Does it get humid in the Twin Cities?

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:48 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think they play indoors…

by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 11, 2008 10:50 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

At least it’ll be fun to play Dunbar again.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 10:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

What are they thinking? Do they know what Minnesota is like in November???

by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 11, 2008 11:23 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Isn’t their last week of play the week before thanksgiving? So they’d only play one two games tops.

Plus the cold is a HUUUGE homefield advantage.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:24 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i'm excited

it’ll be my first visit to Minnesota

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:00 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

They have a big mall. And lots of fishing.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:07 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

And fun accents too.

ಠ_ಠ

by Berkelium97 on Oct 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

good thing I didn’t start Juice against minnesota, Illinois is getting shut down

Not a Longshorite. Not a Rilerian. I'm a Mansionite.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Oct 11, 2008 11:10 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Juice might have just barely scored, depends on the review.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:14 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

nope.

4th down and inches. i say go for it.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:15 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

the Juice is in!

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:16 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

well, i’m hoping Robert Griffin does that like 5 times today

Not a Longshorite. Not a Rilerian. I'm a Mansionite.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Oct 11, 2008 11:16 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No he’s not. For god’s sake JUMP dude.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:16 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

...or not?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Oct 11, 2008 11:17 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Why even run the option at the 2? Just dive it in.

by BearsNecessity on Oct 11, 2008 11:18 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs